>Because Abstinence is a religious social concept?
Clearly you have issues with religion that should be addressed in a thread that addresses that topic. The topic is abortion.
You want to link abstinence and religion, and while some programs might have that element...you cannot argue from a scientific standpoint that short of artificial insemination, someone who does not have sex cannot impregnate someone or get pregnant.
>Oh you're an incel.
More ad hominem. You didn't even really last one full post.
Grayson Williams
Or understand that having sex means the possibility of having a child, and act accordingly. If you're absolutely not ready or willing to have a child, don't have sex.
Grayson Watson
I don't know why I'd have to explain to you why laws based on religion or laws influenced by religion is a dumb idea. Seeing as how you already don't get it while also thinking Child birth is easy, death in child birth doesn't exist and poverty is a myth I had two choices call you an incel or retarded which you demonstrate both quite excellent. Incel seemed like a surefire way of mining gold, which its proving to be. I would never call you a MGTOW. That's just a closet incel you've seem to have embraced the ideology and kool-aid quite well
Bentley Brooks
>I don't know why I'd have to explain to you why laws based on religion or laws influenced by religion is a dumb idea
Moving the goal posts. Again, your religious hate mongering would be better served in a discussion where that was actually the topic. Care to actually address the point you were responding to, or you just going to keep "rawr, religion" even though I have made zero points about it in relation to my argument.
>while also thinking Child birth is easy
I said the numbers didn't support your claims. Not the same thing.
>death in child birth doesn't exist
Never said that either. See previous comment.
>poverty is a myth
See previous comment.
>I had two choices
Debate the merits of your position and present facts, or argue petulantly and hurl insults like someone who has no real case to make.
You clearly chose the latter, because ad hominem and a lot of off topic stuff about religion (which is really just angry ranting) is all you've brought so far.
