what if your female character is getting raped by orcs, get's pregnant and is saved two months into pregnancy?
What would the act of getting an abortion be on the D&D alignment system?
Aaron Ortiz
Cooper Cruz
>You're just a single bag of flesh matter, so it's fine to get rid of you since we're disconnecting from humanity for things we don't care about
Imagine if any living human could be discarded by the arbitrary semantics of some Yea Forums poster
Henry Ross
>>unironically whining about an on topic post that offended your delicate sensibilities, rather than just moving on to a topic of your liking. AND people like you demanding the person who made said topic be banned because you don't like what they say.
This is what real "intolerance" looks like.
Camden Garcia
>Imagine if any living human could be discarded by the arbitrary semantics of some Yea Forums poster
I hope people realize that the current legal cases that allow abortion are just that: the arbitrary semantics of semi random people in semi random places that decide who lives and dies based on if someone decided whether or not to use one of the many easily used and readily available forms of contraception out there.
Angel Hill
Are you an alt rightie? Because this level of disengenous arguing is quite endemic to them
Daniel Morales
Or if it failed
Or if they got trapped
Or if they're going to die if they give birth
Or if they don't want to
Or if they're living in poverty
Or they got raped
John Morales
>Or if it failed
Two forms of contraception and all that. The real issue is, people aren't using them. You don't get such a high percentage of abortions from a something that has a 99% effectiveness rate.
>Or if they got trapped
Are we talking 128 hours?
because they most likely have bigger issues at this point.
>Or if they're going to die if they give birth
And if this were the 1920s, a non 1st world county, or a really unusual situation...you might have a point.
>Or if they don't want to
The old "convenience" argument. I don't like waiting in line sometimes, the person blaring obnoxious music next to me, or a whole host of other issues that are inconvenient. I'm we all find many people "inconvenient" but that isn't a reason, it's an excuse.
>Or if they're living in poverty
Poverty isn't a reason, it's an excuse. There are plenty of options, and it's troubling that this is used and pushed to disproportionately "thin out" minority and poor populations.
...all according to margaret sanger's plan. Anyone who really wants an insightful read into the inner workings of how these people operate really should read her works some time. All this from someone who thought the eugenics programs over in pre WWII Germany were great and should be implemented here, forced sterilization for the undersirables (including the poor, disabled, minorities, etc)
>Or they got raped
Not even a majority of cases.
Even if you allowed for the big three (which statistically aren't): rape, incest, medical people wouldn't be satisfied.
Dylan Young
>The real issue is, people aren't using them. You don't get such a high percentage of abortions from a something that has a 99% effectiveness rate
Because we keep neutering our sex education because reasons. Sex ed unironically did more for preventing abortions then gay ass religious abstinence and shaming
>Are we talking 128 hours? because they most likely have bigger issues at this point.
What? I'm talking about people lying about condoms, their use, or putting a hole in them
>And if this were the 1920s, a non 1st world county, or a really unusual situation...you might have a point.
Oh no
You're retarded
>The old convenience argument
I do agree that its pretty convenient to bot get fired or lose your job because you got pregnant and can't work. Or literally dying. Then again child birth is a very easy and not involved process that completely alters your biology and psychology with a potential for life altering risks all the way to death.
Childbearing is very easy. It's also a great idea to force people to become parents. Who wouldn't learn valuable lessons from forcibly birthing and raising a 1-10 pound shit factory for 30 years.
Assuming you don't die that is.
>The rest of that post
>"Poverty isn't a reason to get an abortioj or use birth control. What do you mean people who live check to check or barely scrapping by don't want to have kids? The housing market is fucking fantastic, student debt is at an all time low, and poverty is as simple as waking up and saying I don't want to be impoverished anymore. You know what would inspire these people? Forcing them to birth and raise a shit factory.
>inb4 don't want to have a kid just practice celibacy and abstinence. You don't want to follow this religious tenet? Well guess you're gonna go to jail bro.
>inv4 pull yourself up by your bootstraps
>inb4 just give the kid up for adoption in our criminally underfunded and lethal foster and childcare services
The absolute fucking state of moral fags.
Levi Myers
>religious abstinence
Interesting how a lot of those programs had zero religious elements to them.
Funny how we tell people "don't drink and drive" because it's 100% effective in avoiding an alcohol related driving incident, but telling people abstinence is the only 100% effective birth control method when it's the truth?
"OMG, you cruel monster! Don't tell people to have sex!"
Sure, tell people about safe sex, but really putting out a fish bowl of condoms and saying "have fun kids" isn't smart wither.
>What? I'm talking about people lying about condoms, their use, or putting a hole in them
In that situation, the woman isn't likely to want an abortion because she's probably trying to get herself pregnant for a host of reasons that will put us into a different discussion.
>I do agree that its pretty convenient to bot get fired or lose your job because you got pregnant and can't work.
That's a basic fact of biology. I don't want to show up for work with a hangover, I don't drink the night before. Same for showing up stoned and drugs, etc.
You don't want to potentially get pregnant, or get someone pregnant, don't have intercourse. It's that simple.
>Assuming you don't die that is.
Because those stats are astronomical.
Again, not the 1920s. Oh, great response to that point, by the way. Interesting how the "pro choice" crowd is all ad hominem because they can't argue facts.
>What do you mean people who live check to check or barely scrapping by don't want to have kids?
Hey everybody, let's keep using the poor as an excuse for everything...yet make sure we never actually do anything substantive to help them.
Plenty of "poor people" actually use contraception effectively and don't have to rely on abortion because they couldn't be bothered to use it.
Interesting how you keep bringing up religion, and the only time I've mentioned it is in response to your posts.
Also, your homophobia is showing. That's pretty intolerant of you.
Brandon Wilson
Because Abstinence is a religious social concept? Are you going to compare the religious belief that you should only have sex when you're married to the social and scientific conclusion that drinking and driving is fatal? I mean the bible does tell us how the world was created so you got me there. You're reductionist analogy was too good
>The rest of your post
Oh you're an incel.
Got it.
Have a good day.