>reverse search
>stephan molyneux, /pol/ archive and some random mongol (finnish) thread
hmmmmmmm
Is this a good book or just racist garbage?
Jonathan Peterson
Caleb Hill
It's from this infograph dum dum
Gabriel Bailey
It’s a pretty decent sample size as you can see from the regularity of the graph
Nathan Turner
fug
Andrew Myers
no sorry your viewpoint was debunked
Jason Collins
I made these yellow markings in university six years ago and uploaded this picture of them to my now long since zucced far right Tumblr blog, and seeing the picture reposted here blows my mind. I'm practically famous now.
Easton Allen
It better be your own book, nigger.
People who annotate library books get the rope.
Kevin Flores
Think it was some sort of paper handout for a class, or something similar. Wasn't a book if I remember correctly.
Jaxon Gray
PC1 is the very first principle component. It's African's vs Everyone Else. There isn't another way to filter this, it's just how it is, humanity left Africa, went through a bottle neck and became Asians, Europeans, Native Americans etc., whilst Africans stayed. New evidence is that besides the 70,000 years that passed since this happened, there was also introgression from archaic hominid species, Neanderthals into Europeans, Neanderthals and Denisovans into Asians and Pacific islanders, and unknown, very archaic hominids into Africans.
I don't think the time spent apart and the introgression is that significant though in terms of ability, rather I think recent evolution is more important, especially the time since agriculture was developed. Doesn't matter where you go, indigenous groups that haven't experienced substantial agriculture (and the diets that go along with it) do very badly in civilisation.
Logan Lewis
Depends on whether you agree with it or not.