APOLOGISE

APOLOGISE

Attached: 1567461740619.jpg (2048x1523, 324K)

>expected anything

>arsenal

>xPTS
>xG
>xA

Attached: 1565942678442.png (697x634, 782K)

>xD

how is performance measured

>UtdArena

Definitely unbiased and neutral source

Itd be sad to see what united have become if it wasnt so funny

>look guys! we are second in the Should Be table! W-we are not that b-bad!
pathetic

I might be old fashioned, but I've recently been looking at which team scored more goals, and using that to determine team ranking using a points system.
I've been giving a team which scores more goals 3 points, teams that score the same number of goals a single point (1) and teams who fail to score as many goals as their opponent 0 (zero) points.

After all the games have been played we can then see who has performed better.

fucking boomers. stop ruining sports

>the city of arsenal

It's based on the fact Utd have been getting a penalty a game but missing them

this, penalties have xG of 0.76

just the xG difference in a game betwwen two teams, the bigger the difference is the more likely a team was earning expected points

This chart is fucking retarded. Analytics babies just dont get football.

>stat geeks really think Dabbing Ngubus United actually have a 76% chance of successfully scoring a penalty
This is why I have a hard time fully trusting stats desu

>Sheffield

Wednesday BTFO

>expected

Attached: 92912421-C313-433F-B75A-B8E0D8487B41.jpg (1983x1111, 346K)

was it retarded too when they told us that Man Utd is heavily overperforming last year?

>xG
>xPTS

Attached: onions.jpg (1024x1024, 126K)

Yes.

This thread sucks as does MUnited.

xFaggot

Legit question, if a measure like xG or xPTS doesn't really approach actual goals or points, wouldn't it render its calculation formula wrong?