Was he better than Paul?

can i share this to my facebook
xoxo s

Well his solo albums are far better than Paul's.

Absolute retards, Paul was the superior songwriter. He is a literal pop melody genius. Look at Johns solo stuff and you’ll see it’s just boring boomer chuck berry rock n roll stuff. Not very memorable besides lyrics and themes.

yeah i think he could probably take paul in a fight he's had more training

he was a cum eating shit infested soul morbid ugly pagan communist foul ridiculously bad terrible woman beater monster pussy window licking mongrel .. hate the guy

Songwriting during the Beatles: John>Paul>George>Ringo

After the Beatles: Paul>George>shit>John and his Asiatic mutant concubine>Ringo

>Lennon's Facebook page sent out a Happy Father's Day message along with a picture of him looking phlegmatic and joyless with Julian and Sean

Irony is apparently not a strong point for Johnfags

controversial opinion: i like the beatles and their music sounds good, but i think they're very overrated. the problem is that most of their music has very little substance to it.

no

What made the Beatles great wasn't the fact that they had three brilliant individual songwriters. It was that PLUS the fact that they worked so well together as a unit. The reason John was considered one of the greatest pop songwriters of all time during his time with the Beatles was because of his synergy with the other members of the group, including Martin. His music would have much less impact without contribution from the other Beatles, and vice versa. See their respective solo careers for evidence of this.