being rich is being able to store things for so long that it costs a lot to store it, the cost of doing so (and preserving the things) lowering the profits of the things you store to $0 but it not mattering at all. and all of this not being so much money to you, so you can keep spending it on the things that add to that pile
or being so wealthy you can pay off any fines for fucking up, and to not care for, any laws you break with the most fun things being locked behind these costs of doing the things. all of this and everything else, where its all learning (which costs money), the things that dont end up needing you to cover the costs and being a failure (learning) being you covering what it is before hitting the "break-even point" and having that source of profits
Hi Yea Forums
Sorry, no.
>muh sealions
I'd say minimum is probably about 10 million
Money is an abstraction OP. There is no amount where you are considered rich. It is completely relative and subjective value. A man who makes a million or more per year takes on a life style befitting of that. The "pay off" is that you are looked at as a success or that you might feel successful because that was what you were taught. But it's an endless pit, a pyramid with no end.
Money was created as a means of control by people who know what real wealth is, and that is power. Lords used to fight over land and resources, not money. No one with a brain gives a care about money. So the truly wealthy are the old families who still own land and resources, the ones who control the game and hand out the piece of paper with numbers on it that you are dumb enough to spend your life going after.
>A man who makes a million or more per year takes on a life style befitting of that.
Except for people who don't succumb to lifestyle inflation.
shut up communist
I think the magic number is 3 million. Any more and you're just being greedy
