What happened to Democratic party of JFK?

What happened to Democratic party of JFK?

Attached: we will replace you.jpg (480x478, 42K)

Other urls found in this thread:

theguardian.com/inequality/2017/nov/20/if-you-tax-the-rich-they-wont-leave-us-data-contradicts-millionaires-threats
lohud.com/story/news/politics/2018/07/02/ocasio-cortez-westchester/751333002/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5824932/
nationalgeographic.com/magazine/2017/01/how-science-helps-us-understand-gender-identity/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

It's unrecognizable, and all but dead. It's all about everything free for everyone now, including illegals.

After Obama became president, the democratic party reached a wall. They had won the culture war and there was nothing left to do. The issue is that once a party reaches said point, they tend to lose voters rather quickly. This needed to be avoided. And once chaos and confusion happens within a political party, the rational people will lose their control. Populists pop up and offer easy solutions. If you let them control and decide the course, then your party will remain relevant. And out of desperation and to buy more time, they agree. But the issue is that once you go down that path, it's very hard to get go back. Once the extremists have gained more control than the rational people, said party evolves. And the traits that defined them become more extreme. It is a phenomenon which is not exclusive to one side, all political parties are susceptible to this.

It has become a party of moocher, freeloader and bloodsucker

Attached: democr1961-2019.jpg (692x436, 40K)

Attached: DNCnowhite.jpg (600x666, 51K)

That's some cool shit you just made up off the top of your head utterly skewed by right leaning ideologies.

Jews

have sex

LULZ, useless nigger arms...

>skewed by right leaning ideologies
>a phenomenon which is not exclusive to one side, all political parties are susceptible to this
Try again faggot

Let's hear your right wing version then. Go ahead; I'll wait.

Personally, I like it, and AOC is an angel.
I feel like I have more in common with her, a woman born to a working class family than the current Republican leadership, who was born rich and never had to work.

Taken over by Sand niggers, Spics and more niggers. The end is nigh.

The same stuff I wrote can be applied to the republican party, except the part about Obama. The Democratic party was for the longest time, the party of reason and logic. It was the republicans who got affected by it first. Otherwise they would have never decided to let Trump represent them. This also why the republicans lost the culture war. Prior to Obama, they enforced "christianity" and they were the party that argued with morals and feelings. You could argue that both sides are on the same level today.

It's like you possess no reading comprehension, this is the absolute state of "education" today, pumping out mindless drones from the robot factory outlet.

>a woman born to a working class family
That's a qualifier for you?

>Both sides are the same.
Personally, I'm against the side of rich tax cuts, concentration camps on the border, anti choice, just to name a few.

Plus, anyone who can't see that Trump may be literally retarded might also be retarded.

>Plus, anyone who can't see that Trump may be literally retarded might also be retarded.
Nice argument

As to her being a woman, no. Her being working class, yes.

Despite being a white male, I feel I have more in common with her, than I do with a lot of other politicians. Plus, she's super cute, right?

>rich tax cuts
>concentration camps on the border
>anti choice
>literally
Nice B8 m8, I r8 8/8.

Not an argument. Just an insult, but I didn't think you would comprehend it in the first place.

>Look, having nuclear—my uncle was a great professor and scientist and engineer, Dr. John Trump at MIT; good genes, very good genes, OK, very smart, the Wharton School of Finance, very good, very smart—you know, if you’re a conservative Republican, if I were a liberal, if, like, OK, if I ran as a liberal Democrat, they would say I'm one of the smartest people anywhere in the world—it’s true!—but when you're a conservative Republican they try—oh, do they do a number—that’s why I always start off: Went to Wharton, was a good student, went there, went there, did this, built a fortune—you know I have to give my like credentials all the time, because we’re a little disadvantaged—but you look at the nuclear deal, the thing that really bothers me—it would have been so easy, and it’s not as important as these lives are (nuclear is powerful; my uncle explained that to me many, many years ago, the power and that was 35 years ago; he would explain the power of what's going to happen and he was right—who would have thought?), but when you look at what's going on with the four prisoners—now it used to be three, now it’s four—but when it was three and even now, I would have said it's all in the messenger; fellas, and it is fellas because, you know, they don't, they haven’t figured that the women are smarter right now than the men, so, you know, it’s gonna take them about another 150 years—but the Persians are great negotiators, the Iranians are great negotiators, so, and they, they just killed, they just killed us.

>nyone who can't see that Trump may be literally retarded might also be retarded.
we know he's retarded. and we know the fact that an obvious retard being in the oval office pisses off the libs so damn much. so we put up with it.

With the increase in diversity in the Democratic party, which lead to more infighting between the different diverse groups of the party.

Attached: democratsjewmuslim.jpg (664x652, 397K)

What the fuck does being of the same class have to do with her abilities?
So you vote for people based on how much you have in common with them instead of their policies?
This is gunna be your first election, isnt it?

No shit it wasnt an argument. You went straight for ad hominem attacks.
>typical

If you could be honest though, and all jokes aside, do you really mean that?
Asking honestly.

Attached: 1559785213587.gif (280x210, 1.41M)

I knew that I would be arguing with an ideologue, but someone so far that they spout what their side feeds them without questioning anything? I am amazed and you accuse me of being skewed by ideologies. I am impressed by the amount of projection.

The Southern Strategy and the 1980 election.
The GOP recoiled in horror to the peace & love movement of the 60s & 70s, and got the hateful southern white utopian fuckheads on board. It’s been a god damn race to the extremes ever since, with Dems trailing behind as usual. Good job idiots, you’ve made everything worse.

Nah mate, everything you said was specific to the Democratic party. There's no sense in trying to pretend you see both sides, because you clearly have a right wing bias that you're rhetorically dancing around.
>they won the culture war
>populists
Worse than that you're just saying a bunch of words without actually saying anything at all. Also protip: the Republican party is still pushing Christian morals, and was never the party of "feelings" while the Dems the party of "logic."

I also agree with her stances, and I trust her education! The things she makes statements on make sense, and she seems sincere in her statements.

Attached: 1559356615868.jpg (640x335, 24K)

...

Yeah, that’s what it is, if you’re fucking braindead.

Right.

Attached: 201906270841-9JznpZc.jpg (2000x2000, 220K)

Huh... I used the obvious arguments. Republicans are anti choice, pro tax cuts for the rich, and there are concentration camps on the border... None of that was even being questioned by either side. Which part is not true?

Attached: Ds4hKL5_d.jpg (640x654, 42K)

ITT: aspies talk politics.
The party died cuz women care more about helping those in need then themselves or their own people. They lack the ability for rational thought over acting on emotions.

Tl;dr women ruined politics cuz estrogen

Pathetic.

The only thing you post is a fake quote to rebut me. Hitler didn't say that.

Why are Republicans so against colleges? They might learn something.

Attached: duckytankman.jpg (620x403, 61K)

Only my first two sentences are about the democratic party, afterwards I desribe a process from a neutral point of view. Heck, I even mention that all parties can fall victims to populism. But to an ideologue such as you, trying to make sense of something and arguing far away from your view may seems like right wing. You deluded yourself into believing and perceiving things in a certain way. I am saying words like "culture war" and "populists" in said context, because they are important factors to this phenomenon. Even your own side uses these terms. So that must mean that your own side actually says nothing either. I am also aware that they are still pushing christian morals as much as your side pushes values, doesn*t matter if islamic, feminist or other values. I remeber the time where atheists (I am one of them), used to make fun of arguing with values and morals. The republican party was the party of feelings. I remember when they tried to ban video games, because of "won't someone think of the children" or when they wanted to get a radio host fired for a "sexist" joke. The Democrats were the party of reason and logic, but nowadays both sides tend to argue with science and logic on certain topics while using morals and values on other topics.

Once again, if I could change your mind with facts, I would. Republicans are the feelings over facts party, unfortunately.

Its not an ad hominem though brotato. It would be ad hominem if it was part of an argument, but it was not, it was just an insult.

You shouldnt use words you don't understand .

Attached: 1559584645684.jpg (214x282, 11K)

>ideologue
stopped reading there faggot

I don't have a side. You clearly do though.

You should challenge yourself more user, when you don't understand a word, look it up!

I believe in you!

Attached: 1559080906207.jpg (250x250, 9K)

What is it with these hojakaboob things on these women's heads? Do they not know this is a sign of repression a symbol of their inferior place in the eyes of their god?

Aww that's cute it's using condescension in lieu of an actual argument

Attached: original.jpg (305x334, 17K)

you know her family had a maid right?

doesnt sound so working class to me.

The fact that you used "concentrations camps on the border" proofs that you are an ideologue. While I personally do not support abortions, I am still highly critical of Alabama's anti-abortion law. For me it is just as flawed and horrible as New York's Pro-Abortion law that would allow abortions until the 9th month. Another factor is the tax cuts for the rich. I know you don't want to accept it, but most people (except for Trump and a few others) worked hard to earn that amount of money. While I do agree that they should be taxed appropriately, we shouldn't tax them too high either. Most of these people (except for stars) keep our economic system going. The moment we tax them too much, they will move which in return will affect us.

Not everything is an argument. I was just hoping you would get smarter!

It's still doing it!

Attached: superthumb.jpg (300x250, 24K)

>legit criticisms of the American political system
>durr not true because orange man bad
I honestly don't know what I was expecting

Except he only ever criticized Dems. He (not very) cleverly masked it by saying "THIS COULD APPLY TO BOTH" but he never actually leveled any criticisms of Repubs.

>no u
Your entire argument can be boiled down to just this. You are not even worth debating. You keep projecting your own problems on to others
The fact that I am actually wasting time reading your non-sensical "arguments" and trying to have a conversation while you ignore everything shows that you are most likely just baiting for the sake of it.

The Republican party of today would be left of the Democrat party of the 60's.
The Majority of Democrats were the ones for segregation and against civil rights. If not for the Republicans civil rights legislation would not have passed.
Inconvenient history truth that they try to rewrite.

liberals need safespaces to et away from words and arguments that might HURT THEIR FEELINGS.

and you say its repubs who live through emotions and not logic

They fit the definition of concentration camps, so that's why I call them that.

As for abortion, I would like to see no abortions, whatsoever, and the best way to do that is through family planning and sex education, which the current leadership does not support.

As for the arguments that you can't tax the rich too high or they'll leave, don't trust Ayn Rand. theguardian.com/inequality/2017/nov/20/if-you-tax-the-rich-they-wont-leave-us-data-contradicts-millionaires-threats

Attached: PFk5b8x_d.jpg (640x714, 40K)

I would pay ever dollar I have to see these 2 sissor. IDK about their views, I vote for hot women.

>Another factor is the tax cuts for the rich
Not the cum gargling giga faggot that you're replying to, but I'll disagree here. The rich by no means are taxed appropriately in the US. Through the abuse of multiple loopholes in the system, they pay disproportionately less than the working class.
That said, there's not much we can do. They can purchase politicians. We can't.
They can pack up their toys and go to another country that will pay them to move their business. We can't.
I don't have a magic bullet for the problem, but I do recognize that it exists

I can't find anywhere thar she had a maid, but I may be retarded.

This article did make me like her more though.

lohud.com/story/news/politics/2018/07/02/ocasio-cortez-westchester/751333002/

Attached: 1559941399794.jpg (441x449, 46K)

>Except he only ever criticized Dems
I did not only criticised the dems. Once again my crticism was cleary towards all sides of the political spectrum. Only my first two sentences talked about the democratic party and merely served as an introduction for a larger problem within the political system of countries with multiple parties. You crticism boils down to ad hominem attacks against individuals you don't like, ideological view points and few somewhat legitimate points were a compromise would be better than a one-sided solution.

I literally linked the post where he criticised the reps. If you didn't take everything that everybody said and treat it as a personal attack, maybe you could get a girlfriend

Fake news broseph. You gotta get out of your bubble. Its conservatives that are all aboit safe spaces now.

Attached: phfk6hmtwv631.png (480x480, 417K)

I'm there is a magic bullet.... Elect people who don't take corporate PAC money or money from megadonors. It's that simple. AOC is a shining example here. She is a Justice Democrat who won her district and did it with only small dollar donations. She is the future and will be president one day. President AOC has a nice ring to it.

user, I'm falling in love with you.

Attached: 1558429616594.jpg (750x751, 96K)

You do realize that it clearly said "all political parties are susceptible". How is that right leaning? Try harder.

Dont feed him user

Attached: 1561867286312.jpg (720x960, 133K)

I'll take "Southern Strategy" for 4 hundo Alex.

Republicans getting the segregationists sorta proves that null, right?

Attached: 0_il_570xN1456053095_3qdu.jpg (615x820, 42K)

>fit the definition of concentration camps
You are mocking and making light of the concentration camps and the suffering of the jewish people. As a german, I feel disgusted.
>I would like to see no abortions
Then why did you bring up "anti-choice" as an issue you had with the republican party. You make no sense.
>don't trust Ayn Rand
I never heard of this person to begin with. I am only stating what is true. Do you think big cooperations and rich people give a flying fuck about any of the import taxes Trump does? The answer is a resounding "no". They just move productions somewhere else or move to other parts where they aren't affected by it. See what multiple countries have been doing, because of brexit and its own financial uncertainties. They moved somewhere else.

>I do agree that they should be taxed appropriately

Stop feeding the troll. You will waste your time trying to make logical statements. All they want is to keep pushing the "conservative bad" narrative. There are no winners in this fight.

by your own words you admitted that liberals need safe spaces.

>biologically there are two genders
liberals: i feel like a girl today and toad yesterday

>concentration camps on the southern border
obama is the one who started that shit
>no he didnt!

>everyone should be respected
except white people, theyre EVIL!

stay classy there man

>pic is of the average mentality of a liberal

Attached: 1535350931309.jpg (564x564, 63K)

No man. Not even close. We Dem socialists argue policy above all else. We don't care how it hurts your little right wingers feelings. We are going to rise up and take over then you will know horror. Protecting protected classes even more. Making it a felony to even post racial or sexual slurs and epitaphs. Making it a requirement women earn more money than men for a change. Free college and higher minimum wage for all. Medicare for all. Free and open borders to allow in as many refugees and immigrants as possible with NO WALLS. We will bam all guns and take them from your homes under military force. We will stop school shootings easily. We will make access to abortion and birth control a constitutional right that can never be taken away again and forcible occupy any stated who try to pass abortion bans. We will make sure white men are correctly discriminated against as they need to be beaten down into submission.

Attached: 1476793436067.png (400x400, 23K)

You gotta calm down Broseidon. You're not making any sense. You're just using internet strawmen, that never came up.

Go outside, meet a liberal, talk to them, we're normal boys and girls and ladyboys and the other bajillion genders there are.

The gender thing, I don't know about. I've only ever been one gender, but science says there are more than two, so I believe it.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5824932/

>Ayn Rand
>I never heard of this person
Rand was a sci-fi author with a hell of a libertarian bent. She also developed the concept of Objectivism. Hey stuff is worth a read. Even if you don't agree, it's good literature.
Bonus: The original Bioshock was a criticism of her philosophies

>there should be no need for two terms
It's like the author never set foot outside of his own country or heard of synonyms.

>we're normal boys and girls
>mfw he means that each one is a normal girl and boy simultaneously

Attached: jc_face.jpg (245x280, 10K)

>guise my pea sized brain cant comprehend the difference between gender and sex

Facts don't care about your feelings user. They are, by definition, concentration camps.

No one wants abortions user, but do you want there to be freedom to decide? Personally, I feel like prevention is easier and cheaper than cure, and science agrees with me.

Whether or not you know Ayn Rand, the rich don't move like you said. I posted an article with citations to prove it. As an example, why have so many rich people not left California (High tax), and moved to Kansas(Low Tax).

Attached: AdWs0Hr_d.jpg (640x783, 74K)

>science says there are more than two, so I believe it.
>that link
Did you think that people would see ncbi and think 'osnap science says there's more than two genders!'
It's just pseudo-scientific postulation, there's not a single hypothesis in that entire link of shit.
The research that 'proved' that fat people live longer than healthy people had more fact in it than that

Everyone is dumber for having read your post. I award you zero points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

It was the American people that recoiled in horror at the 68 democrat convention riots which showed the true direction of the party. History is repeating itself and once again the American people will recoil in horror at what it is becoming now.
The closest thing to the party of JFK right now is the GOP, and even then the GOP is to the left of that

Christ, I am killing these arguments today. Somebody needs to stop me before I start masturbating to my own superiority.

Attached: 1558547330534.jpg (564x564, 61K)

I wanted to take your arguments seriously, but espeially using the meme sentence "facts don't care about your feelings" , I now realize that my attempt for a debate was pointless to begin with. A troll keeps trolling no matter how much arguments you bring to the table.

>Time is up white bois.

Attached: 1561865261492.jpg (990x1400, 394K)

not my problem that you dont understand it. but ill break it down. lets begin.

you said that repubs are the party of feeling over logic.

liberals believe that if you FEEL like a girl, then you must be a girl, and everyone must treat you as such, because you feel as suck.

biology and nature says there are three, (3) genders occuring naturally. male, female, and hermapbrodite, (those showing characteristics of both genders)

liberals, for some reason believe there are what? 57 genders, none of which show biologically, which means theyre all in a persons mind, and they just feel that way. which is a brain disorder, not a body disorder. but they FEEL this.

just because a scientist says this or that, in todays "youll get a mob sicced on you for saying this" mentality, do you blame them for just going on and placating those who feel instead of think?

liberals feel its right to spit on you if you dont go along with their warped sense of reality. thats emotions controlling you, not logic

did that help? i hope so, because even a five year old can get most of that.

>I accomplished nothing in my life, but it's not my fault! I'm a demiromantic pansexual pandakin with self diagnosed bpd, ADHD, autism, and ptsd! I'm a worthy person just by virtue of my existence! And anybody who says different is just a dum-dum poop-face!

Attached: 11F1DCB83CFB46FAAE9479A183411E64.jpg (1242x1236, 999K)

>biology and nature says there are three, (3) genders occuring naturally. male, female, and hermapbrodite, (those showing characteristics of both genders

You are confusing sex and gender

>hermapbrodite
The issue is that intersexuality (hermaphroditism) is the mere result of a genetic disfunction.

You speaking about yourself?

>gender
>the cultural and societal roles determined by sex
I'm afraid it is you who has no clue what gender is

You conveniently forgot the rest of the def

to social and cultural differences rather than biological ones. The term is also used more broadly to denote a range of identities that do not correspond to established ideas of male and female

no u

Attached: 1f8.jpg (640x467, 37K)

And yet you conveniently left out
>determined by sex

Browned

Attached: democrats3.jpg (1000x650, 479K)

jews

Attached: Screenshot_20190630-083439_Chrome.jpg (1080x2220, 573K)

You? That's cool you finally admitted it

Attached: 1560701758900.jpg (804x1024, 171K)

>passing a pic that process me right
I want some of what you're smoking

God damned good question

hermaphroditic dimorphism is not a brain disorder, it is shown only in body development of a species.

if you get turned on by cock, and your physically a male, youre gay, even if its got tits, its still biologically a male of the species. even if it got its dick chopped off and turned around, its still a male of the species, despite the cosmetic alterations.

if youre a female of the species and you get turned on by munching beaver, youre gay, even if you have a fake penis put on and thi k youre a man, youre still a female of the species, despite the cosmetic changes youve had done.

if you have naturally, both tits and a dick, youre a hermaphrodite.

if youre a man and feel like a woman, you have a brain disorder and should seek mental help.

> def says gender isnt based on sex and used broadly for a range of identities
>user claims it proves gender and sex are the same and only 3 exist
Kek

I don't feel okay spitting on you user.

nationalgeographic.com/magazine/2017/01/how-science-helps-us-understand-gender-identity/

Just because a 5 year old can understand it, doesn't make it correct. The world is complicated, with complicated issues and people.

Attached: 1559991916913.jpg (500x375, 62K)

>if you have naturally, both tits and a dick, youre a hermaphrodite.
That's not a hermaphrodite. There are no true hermaphrodites within h.sapiens
The closest we get are individuals with genetic mutations that result in one functioning set of genitalia, and one vestigial set. Such mutations are comorbid with profound mental retardation and a predisposition to vote AOC

No trolling, honestly. You brought up you were offended by a fact. How am I supposed to treat that? You can't just give up when you're being proven wrong. You gotta change your opinions! If you don't feel like arguing, thats fine too. Its tiring. Just know I am being 100% sincere.

Attached: mDcmqfT_d.jpg (500x380, 23K)

Reread your pic, it literally says that gender is derived from sex. Does your wrangler know that you're on a 18+ website?

Then it goes on to say

to social and cultural differences rather than biological ones.
And even says
The term is also used more broadly to denote a range of identities that do not correspond to established ideas of male and female


Hmmm seems like you are wrong

I love how shills are trying desperately to derail this thread.

What happened to the Democratic party of JFK? I miss having 2 parties that didn't hate me for being White.

>not a brain disorder
>said that it was a genetic disfunciton
You need to start reading.

Please note, you do not have to be retarded to vote for AOC.

I bleed red, white, and blue, and I vote for AOC in hopes that I can get healthcare to find out why my blood is all these colors.

Attached: 1558419735478.jpg (720x720, 61K)

Attached: 1286776408442.jpg (822x640, 378K)

Not a shill, and conversations change user.

Attached: 4vxn78g4bx231.jpg (1055x537, 63K)

I am not biting that bait buddy.

>literally ignores the part of a dictionary definition that xhe doesn't like
You really do support AOC, don't you?

Attached: PrancingLala.png (722x525, 624K)

your white country is no more

Attached: omarnoplaceforwhite.png (1238x801, 750K)

never heard of the chemical coctail that is in your brain?

being gay is a brain disorder, chemical imbalance maybe, being a hermaphrodite is a genetic disorder

whats so hard to understand?

>I'm severely retarded and vote for AOC in hopes of getting free shit
That's what I was saying

fukken saved

>says I'm ignoring parts of the def as user ignores 2/3 of it kek
Just a reminder
"The term is also used more broadly to denote a range of identities that do not correspond to established ideas of male and female"

great way to start a war

charge everyone of being a certain color as a bad person who must be put down

>not realising it was whites who brought us all the luxuries we take for granted

In a thousand years nobody is going to be digging up our bodies for research like we dig up mummies and remark "it depends" when asked if it was a boy or a girl.

>state that it is a genetic disfunction
>you reply with "hurr durr not a brain disorder"
>I call out the fact that you can't read
>you repeat the same point I made originally

Attached: Nword.jpg (576x1024, 78K)

>ignoring intensifies
Just a reminder:
"Determined by sex"
This is really some a good example of how a SJW literally has to ignore reality for their group influenced schizophrenia to work

You are ignoring the small part "a condition that affects people of both genders" in your own screenshot.

they changed from being only for white people who hate brown people, to being only for brown people who hate white people, but like being led by white people

>this is what happens when you take the chains off

Looks like Ketchup.

You're making the argument that right leaning ideologies are correct.

go here

Counter question. What ever happened to the party of Lincoln and Eisenhower? Last actual Republican president was ford. Reagan is about as GOP as Sanders is Democrat or trump isn't an ape that uses doritos dust as fountain make up.

-an actual Republican

Your nation is so divided it will be easy to conquer. You fight about genders and political identifications like there is nothing else, this blinds you to the true enemy. Good bye america

apparently you need it on a second grade level here with so.e if this is that then its this thrown in.

genetics of body development, is not dependant on whats going on inside the brain. just like whats going on developmentally with the brain, is not dependent with whats going on in the bodies development. while you can argue rightfully that they are of the same person, they develop differently from one another.

if it was, then wed all be fucked in some way.

the bodies development isnt decided on outside influences as much as the brain is. too much of one chemical,ornot enough of one, can have a profound effect on the brains development, with negligible effecton the body.

understand now?

Where is "determined by sex" in that def?

Attached: 8511606.jpg (627x626, 28K)

it's not Ketchup

Attached: Nword2.jpg (684x791, 275K)

typical reaction from a liberal

>no argument, best try and put him down and say i win

>make the same point as him
>he can't read
>point it out
>still doesn't understand that I agree with him
>accuses me of being a liberal

Attached: 317.png (500x501, 80K)