Is there a rational or a practical argument for opposing abortion?

So killing human life is ok as long as they weren't aware that you killed them?

Then why not make it legal to kill newborn babies who have, as you put it, "no life experiences, or self awareness"?

Is it ok to kill people who are in a coma because they have no "self awareness, or desire to live"? What if it was 99% guaranteed that person would wake up from that coma in 9 months and live a full life? Is it ok to kill them?

>hurting nobody
That child would have lived a potentially full life full of happiness and sorrow. But it's "not hurting anybody" because you took it away before they started?

the child is inside of the woman.
ergo the woman has the right to take out the unborn child.
its not about murder its about having control over your own anatomy, the potential person does not trump the conscious living person

>"it's the woman's body and choice"
No, it's the child's body. The woman can do whatever she wants with her lungs or her gall bladder or her intestines. The babies body is inside hers.

By that logic, if I put my friend's pet hamster in my mouth, I have the right to kill it just because it's inside my body, and therefore my choice?

It is murder. And it is wrong to the majority of the world now and forever