Flawless, simple argument against the classical interpretation of god:
1.God created all of time at once, or he knew all possible future sequences of events
2.God cannot create something he does not want to create.
Therefore
3.God cannot create a universe that contains evil. (as he cannot dislike any element of that universe or any possible sequence of events)
Therefore
4. The classical conception of god is inconsistent
You're projecting the human understanding of good and evil. To God, there is simply balance.
No, I am simply assuming and arguing against the classical conception of God (Christianity, islam), where he desires certain things to be the case in the universe.
God's greatest trick is making people believe he exists.
>assuming you know what God wants and that desert nomads 2000 years ago got it right
2/10 for getting me to respond
Let's try this in a different way.
>God cannot create a universe that contains evil
How does God define evil then?
I am not saying what god does or does not want, I am arguing against how people typically see him and showing that it is inconsistent.
Anything he does not want to be the case.
Simple really.
God is an asshole an wants to create evil because genocide and sacrifices get his tiny cock hard
In the big picture, the statement of everyones life is one that respects god.
The evil person is evil for some time and then learns his lesson burning in hell, a magnificent fire honoring the lord, or the good who honor and love god before they die get to bask in his glory for the rest of time.