If you support circumcision, you're a literal NPC

just stop snipping dicks your cultist freaks
learn to use metric units while you're at it

Benefits of routine circumcision of infants outweigh the risks when it’s done by a medical professional. That’s the consensus us of the medical community. But since a lot of doctors are Jewish it doesn’t mean anything, right?

better not cut your hair, nature made it grow that long for a reason, you hippie.

That is not a consensus and you are picking and choosing facts to support the circumcision business.

better pull out your nails so it doesn't get dirty under them

Do you often fuck things with your hair? The penis is also an organ and not superfluous body hair.

american doctors recommend it to religious people because otherwise they would take kids to be snipped at their priest or whatever other sort of weirdo. Better make it a clean medical procedure than leave it to any nutjob with scissors

There are doctors all over the world though, and most of the world doesn't do it. Sure that's not what you'd call a consensus right

Doctors also recommend vaccinations and religious nut jobs refuse to get them. Why would religious people give a shit what a medical professional thinks?

Uncut to cutfag here:
After feeling both sides of the argument I would have to say that uncut was far superior in the sense of pleasure and relaxation.

Being cut only allows me to have a shower w/o having to pay attention to washing said areas.

If I had the choice I would 1000% go back to being uncut but “religious” gf at the time wanted me cut.

In conclusion: girls touched my dick wether it was cut or not

P.s: all you cut fags on here are on another level of bullshitery

>objective facts
Objective fact: phimosis is a rare condition, and phimosis that is so severe as to require circumcision is even rarer.

Objective fact: if you practice basic personal hygiene you won't have a problem with smegma or urinary infections.

Objective fact: wearing a condom will better protect you from STDs than removing your foreskin, and circumcision doesn't remove the need to wear a condom.

Objective fact: circumcision is genital mutilation by the medical definition: Disfigurement or injury by removal or destruction of any conspicuous or essential part of the body. The removal of the foreskin is objectively conspicuous.

Objective fact: circumcision can result in permanent damage to the penis and even death.

Objective fact: the foreskin contains a massive amount of nerve endings, which are stimulated through the motions of sex. It also allows the penis to smoothly glide into and out of the vagina, avoiding irritating friction that diminishes pleasure for both.

Objective fact: the foreskin protects the mucous membrane of the glans, keeping it soft and supple. The glans of a circumcised penis becomes keratinized over time causing it to irritate the vaginal mucosa during sex, which is one reason why people use artificial lube.

Objective fact: In the US circumcision was introduced explicitly as a way of preventing masturbation in boys and diminishing sexual pleasure. It was also advocated to perform the circumcision on boys without anesthetic so that they would associate the trauma with sex.

Objective fact: in all but the rarest of cases - e.g. extreme phimosis - there is no benefit to circumcision that cannot be obtained through taking a shower and wearing a condom.

Objective fact: circumcision irreversibly alters a boy's body without his consent or ability to comprehend the repercussions and without a medical need.