If you support circumcision, you're a literal NPC

female circumcision is for the sole purpose of trying to remove their ability to feel pleasure in hopes it will stop them for slutting abound.

Males is to just make it easier to stay clean

Female circumcision is for cleanliness too.
But the real main purpose of male circumcision is to discourage masturbation.

>one unnecessary bad thing is okay because there's another unnecessary bad thing
wtf did you even come up with that

Male genital mutilation also started as a result of trying to prevent boys from having "impure thoughts". Intent doesn't matter, what actually happened matters.

More to the point, you are literally arguing in favor of mutilating the genitals of children

Attached: 1507210107994.jpg (400x505, 51K)

wrong on both

Why don't you cut off your fucking arms so your armpits stay cleaner

I didn't, he did. "This one thing with only downsides is bad so that makes this other thing, also only with downsides, okay" was his logic

Males is also to remove pleasure

>actually defending mutilation of children
And the trolls that do it aren't even funny. Oof.

What happened to the creativity on Yea Forums?

Attached: 1521873670465.jpg (355x440, 130K)

the fact you equate foreskin with arms is hilarious

>actually defending mutilation of children's genitals

Attached: 1526873858911.jpg (788x524, 133K)

>Oof
>talking about creativity

Attached: 1539959550562.gif (652x562, 626K)

Should we dock tails and ears on dogs because they could get caught on things?

never seen cropped tails?

Yeah, and it's banned in most first world countries because it's something that should obviously be banned.

Sounds like any sort of mutilation should be banned, right?

Aren't you that one fucking dude from the Resident Evil forum? The one obsessed with circumcision?

I for one am glad I wasn't mutilated for the sake of a religion I don't even believe in

>Males is also to remove pleasure
except it doesnt

Except it does

Attached: 1507567561149.jpg (680x444, 38K)

>actually defending mutilation of children's genitals

Attached: 1551545160854.png (280x278, 103K)

you wouldn't know

Yeah. I'm going to let your comment just sit there.

The overwhelming majority of the public is highly against it. It's why owners have to do it themselves and it ends up being done poorly and sometimes ends up with dogs dying.

Attached: Animation1.gif (630x630, 28K)

why wouldn't I?

You are a stupid fuck.
Female circumcision is like cutting off then end of your dick the whole fucking head.

Ignorant fucks.

>actually defending mutilation of children's genitals

Attached: 1537927010726.gif (320x240, 704K)

if you lost your foreskin as a baby you can't know how good it feels to have it
you may not have completely lost the ability to feel pleasure but some of it is gone with your foreskin

yo can i get that first pic uncensored?
for uhh... medicinal... research... purposes...

The best part is that most mutilated fagets posting here probably hate "da joos and da mudslimes'" but can't wait to copy their brand of paedo-cock-torture...

You have running water at your house? Cool, no need to cut your babies cocks, you fucking animals.

I say do whatever the fuck you want. Who cares?

Attached: 1556987589709.jpg (1280x1280, 435K)

And that includes hurting other people?

Yes it is. The only difference is the gender.

Are you really that retarded? Can you really not understand his analogy or are you just pretending to?

You are factually incorrect.
The only thing they share is the word circumcision.

For the love of god educate yourself.

>you

Attached: uncut.webm (720x480, 1.98M)

How do you make it to that conclusion?

You dry cocked faggots really need to stop pushing this meme. Enjoy your chafed, dead cockhead.

you get mutilated as a baby before you have any say in the matter. You spend your whole life having to deal with it, and telling yourself is alright and probably for the better. By the time you have kids, of course you're going to do it to them too.
That's how this unnecessary dick snipping gets perpetuated.

I get it how it got started fuckton of time ago when they bathed once a year and thought sex was evil, but there's no need to keep going with this

>female: to remove pleasure and for cleanliness
>male: to remove pleasure and for cleanliness

Cope

Attached: 5795467388.jpg (1866x1620, 192K)

cutting off your arms to make it easier to clean armpits would equate to cutting off your dick to make it easier to clean your balls.

Equating foreskin that you wont even miss to arms is fucking retarded. The fact that 3 of you can't comprehend that is even more hilarious

>actually defending mutilation of children's genitals

Attached: 1546134833752.png (588x409, 13K)

Hell yeah dude.

Attached: 1552054934473.jpg (500x576, 32K)

You know how sexist it is to consider the well-being of boys, OP

my dad cut my dick

my son is 1 month old and I didn't cut his because I don't believe in genital mutilation

A more accurate analogy would be foreskin = underarm hair.

Congrats. I bet you dont believe in immunization either do you faggot

If you don't wash every day, maybe. Are you a fucking goatherd with no access to water? Cool, mutilate your cock then.

Oh, you're not a goat fucker from the 7th century?! Just have a wash you stupid cunt.

Who the fuck wants to see an uncircumcised dick?

not really as hair always grows back
maybe like ripping off your nails so you don't have to keep taking care of them

That's an assumption with no evidence. Stop trying to stir up shit fuckhead.

>is fine, hab gib da doc shekels already, don eben miss the end of my actual penis

laughable

>they cut off less human flesh than the others
>they must be the good guys
NPC

You? Ya know cos you're a fucking homo

he gets his first shots in 2 weeks, I just don't believe in making the decision to cut my sons dick without asking him. do you support children transitioning faggot? I bet you like the idea of cutting little kid dicks don't you

>miss the end of my actual penis
you actually believe that? You get that from Robin Hood Men in Tights?

It was literally done for the same reason you dumbfuck. Quit spouting off 90's NPC bullshit and look of the inventor of Kellogg's cereal

Who the fuck wants to see a dry, crusty, scarred dick?

Oh so you are retarded. The comparison is supposed to be how you wouldnt remove a part of your body for cleanliness. Yes foreskin and armpits dont hold the same importance on the body, but that just shows you completely missed the point pointing that out

Oh boy. Is this why burgers fuck less and eat more?

NPC...wow...how retro. havent heard that in a while

Attached: 1525451287986.png (381x353, 38K)

there is no point when you try to compare something so far apart you fucking retard

>posts a static gif
That's somehow dumber than your previous post

it has a transparent background you fucking moron

>mad that his dad cut his dick

Its ok user I am pissed at my family too. just don't justify it, let your son if you ever manage to breed make the choice for himself. We were robbed of that choice

Your brain doesn't work so good, does it?

>I get it how it got started fuckton of time ago when they bathed once a year and thought sex was evil,
In North America it was actually started by the Kellogg cereal guy. No lie.

i heard you guys need lube to jack off

You're right, those girls have it easy.

Good on you. Ignore the weakass troll

I heard you were retarded.

>but you can wash inside the hood so you don't get smegma

If you don't have a hood, you can't get smegma in the first place

Only cut guys care about cut dicks. Literally no one else cares

Im the secondfag here. I totally agree. I spent years saying it was normal and it isn't a big deal, (which to be fair almost everyone of my friends is cut) but it always bothered me that I had no say.

I cant say if which is better... Sleepy Seal VS Arrowhead, but I want my son to pick for himself

I bet your dick is as dry as your sense of humor

I bet you think women don't care about size either

I'm cut and have to use lube, just as (((planned))). You don't? How does your dick not chafe?

by getting her wet first

>bitches about current meme slang
>posts current meme
How retarded of you

The post was literally about jacking off. How are you making your hand wet user?

Attached: 1494701565743.png (515x800, 100K)

really? is it possible that cut guys don't care and don't want to think about being uncut since there's no way to go back and there's no manly reason to give a fuck while the uncut guys could always get it done and then experience both worlds? cut guys aren't jealous, of course, because uncut is rare in american porn. uncut though want to justify being a freak that was either 1. neglected 2. left uncut because their parents didn't want them to irresponsibly breed (it's harder to ejaculate successfully to actually impregnate, so much so that tribal customs are to dry out the vagina with bark so it's rough and pulls the foreskin back) 3. wanted them to be anything but "jews" when in reality, it's an ancient egyptian royal custom (that "dick washers" image) and jews worshiping those that enslaved and persecuted them makes no sense to give THEM credit for the practice and western whitey is just that dumb, considering it a "jewish custom".

Why do you fucking mongoloids think this is such a big deal? It takes half a second to pull your foreskin back and wash your head, and you have to be a real fucking dirty cunt to even get smegma in the first place. You're really just making it sound like you don't ever wash your cock

ah. i missed that part. I'll let you faggots go back to talking about jacking off

If they're skinned tight enough

>my mouth is full of bacteria might as well cut my lips off so its cleaner
Cut fags actually believe this

there's no way they would now how simple it is since they never get to experience it.
It's the one excuse they have to cling to though. It's that or hating their parents for mutilating them

Exactly. I suppose these fucktards need their buttocks removed to wash their asshole.

im honestly jealous. I had a few uncut friends who went cut for girls and said it ruined masturbating.. plus I have a buddy who claims he can make an incredible turkey GOBBBBLE sound with his foreskin. it was one of the biggest fights I had with my parents about how they just decided to cut my dick despite being non-religious and they just did it because.

Well, males pleasure is less, though.

I refer you to my previous post and considering uncut people are already dirty cunts, it makes no difference

exactly this. They feel like they are perfectly fine and pretend it has health benefits, although especially the latter is only true if you do not have access to running water.

They cut away the most sensible part of the penis skin and they cut away a VAST amount of it, also damaging the nerves and forever crippling a mans sexual satisfaction.

A truely horrible practice.

My parents did it because (wait for it) every single doctor in the ward said that it was the healthy thing to do. WOW BIG SHOCKER THE DOCTORS ARE RIGHT FOR ONCE!

no you're literally a retard because you can't understand hypothetical questions as non-literal

Or they get paid more to do it, you simple cunt

and you're dirty for having all those hair follicles on your head, better scalp yourself bald to be clean amiright

there is no culture in the world that practies female circumcision exclusivly

some going as far as to cut parts of the penis off
one tribe cuts off the whole head with a axe like tool

Interesting piece of history:

Female circumcision in africa began as a way to protect females from rape-gangs of roaming arabs, which was a huge problem at the time. They mutilated their genitalia because arabs found it disgusting and so they were less likely to be repeatedly gangraped and/or enslaved.

This means that circumcised girls were more likely to be "pure" and so were more desireable to africans. This became a mark of status.

my son was just born and everyone told me it was a choice. only the arab nurses tried to push it, and said since I was cut I should match the baby. we had many nurses and our primary OBGYN say that she thought it was better to leave the choice to him and she was relieved that we didn't make the decision for him.

If you have any actual sources for why its healthy id love to see it but I think your parents just blew smoke up your ass because youre a cutfag like me and you cant go back to your natural body

dickmutilated doctors trying to cope. Vast majority of mankind doesn't do it and it's fine. Doctors disagree about many things

Except it does.

ho-ly-shit you have no idea how much destruction is actually done to a penis by circumcising it.

On the other hand - how could you, you porbably never experienced how nature intended sex to feel like.

Pro-Tip: Cutting a childs dick has a way more serious effect then cutting an adults dick. The skin that is removed from a small childs dick would have developed almost HALF of the skin of the fully grown dick. The damage to sexual potential is HUGE. Seriously, do some reading.

ask your mom how much pleasure i still had

0/10 bait

I don't care how you cope with your mutilated dick, at least don't impose this fate on your innocent offspring.
Sure it doesn't ruin your life, but it has no benefit other than the absurd mental gymnastics only cutfags make to console themselves.

worked well enough 5/10 at least

True, it's a choice, but if they do it later then it'll actually hurt as opposed to getting it cut as a baby.
Considering most of them were muzzies and street-shitters, I doubt that they were cut.

Male circumcision is a procedure done in the hope that it will have as little physical impact as possible. Its not intended to affect functionality or sexual enjoyment.

In the civilized world we do male circumcision because otherwise the goddamn religious people go to the witchdoctor (or rabbi, imam, asshat or whatever you want to call him). Those butchers have huge failure rates and often damage the kids. So we do the procedure. Safer that way.

We dont do female circumcision because thats a procedure intended to cause damage, thats the entire point of it. At best, it cuts off the clitoris. At worst, it mutilates the entire area and then sews it together to ensure the first time is more painful and dangerous.

So far loving this. I'm cut and I encourage every cutfag having a son to atleast allow them to decide for themselves.

Ask yourself, wouldn't you have rather experienced sex/masturbation/etc with your natural dick then if you really wanted to made the choice for yourself? It drives me fucking crazy knowing I never had the choice and can NEVER go and know what its like, I can never know what im missing, and I cant make a choice about my own biology for myself because my dad said "fuck it he'll look like me"

I think you're putting the cart before the horse by assuming he knows what sex feels like at all.

Wait what? Please elaborate

see If you really want your dick cut at 20 you can deal with 1 day of pain. that's so much less than 25 years of wondering what it would have been like if you hadn't been mutilated since birth. its the only actual argument ive had with my dad because I feel like he was completely irresponsible and just didn't care to look into it.

Also it definitely still hurts babies (they just don't remember it)

Better to traumatize a child by slicing their dick before they can rationalize pain than have a consenting adult do it.. actual fucking retard.

top fucking kek. The doctors are cutfags and are trying to cope AND they make more money mutilating your child. In reality, there is no medical reason to mutilate a healthy dick. America is the only first world country that still does that and you're on the same page with the jews and arabs. Why don't you go have a nice 7th century party somewhere?

Sure there is. If you live in the desert and never wash yourself its easier to keep a cut dick clean.

Thats a reason.

See the thing is that I don't wonder : )
In fact, I rest easy knowing that there are Grown Ass Men out there who care SO MUCH about Other Men's cocks. Kinda gay tbh

Acutally, male mutilation is done to diminish sexual experience so the kid does not fuck around. Too bad it also ruins sex forever

Mutilate:(verb) to inflict a violent and disfiguring injury upon

Sounds like you didn't know what that word means so here you go

Attached: 1537503959014.jpg (1408x1269, 214K)

To be fair, that is what circumcision is. Both male and female is about inflicting injury on the genitalia.

I mean it isn't though, and besides, how would an Uncut dude know how a Cut dude feels in their dick?

im so glad i dont have a desensitized mutilated jew dick.
anyone that is pro male circumcision is probs circumcised himself and biased so he denies any wrongdoing because he thinks we all have smega around our dicks.

had to turn it gay, didn't you? I just wonder what my natural body would be like, and don't like the fact that someone took it upon themselves to decide to slice my dick for my within hours of birth.

Keep justifying your parents shitty parenting though, im sure (((they))) are very pleased

>Who the fuck wants to see the natural human body?

I don't know maybe most people

I'll let his mom decide. she's the one who has to suck the thing

actually, that is pretty much exactly what I would subsume "cutting off a huge piece of a helpless childs dick for no reason" under.

Hey, if you wanna be Uncut then good on you, there's treatment out there, but the fact that you have the AUDACITY to call my proud Italian family a bunch of Jews really makes my blood boil

Sadly I have to inform you that you are retarded.

We do not care about other mens dicks but about crippling children you fuckwit.

i seriously didn't even know what smeg was before the internet, and I would go like 3 days without a shower sometimes.
Unless you're intentionally trying to let it build to record a weird fetish porno it's not a big deal.

I understand it as a hygiene thing for mesopotamian dudes in their dusty tents, 5 hour camel ride away from the nearest pond, but for anyone in recent history it's just unnecessary

There is significantly less erogenous tissue, destroyed nerve endings and a significantly less sensitive glans. Enlighten me on how that could improve things.

Your trips hold no power here, you're talking about a COCK and what happens to said cock. Like it or not, you're a Gay...

While we're at it, we should start pulling out all fingernails and toenails because it removes the risk of a hangnail or fungal infection and the need to trim your nails as they grow.

By tugging, not rubbing.

Most sandniggers and Christfags are too

theyre doing what (((They))) want because the majority of Italians are shit for brains and just do what anyone tells them to. Almost as bad as niggers

albiet less prone to criminal activity and have a better sense of family

we get it, you love dick cheese.

>literal
you keep using that word. I don't think it means what you think it means

I vaguely remember a time when there were no 12 year olds on /b.

So ur gay aswell ? good for u user

Gender is a social construct right? Or is that only your belief when it benifits?

i wonder how many guys become gay or just sexually confused for having dicks incapable of fully experiencing pleasure as intended

>itt: american cutbois and their jewed gf's damage controlling

>female circumcision

Attached: pepe-214.jpg (125x122, 3K)

Wrong.

Might be a social experience also

this. And it is tiring.

what does that have to do with one having foreskin removed vs the other getting their clit and labia cut off and sewed shut

If I allow my son to be circumcised then wouldn't his dick get cold?

not cold, but dull

You uncutfags refuse to acknowledge objective facts and instead defend yourselves with only ethical and subjective conjecture (i.e. it feels better).

imagine being so much of a whipped beta cuck that you let your gf talk you into mutilating your dick
Imagine telling her you prefer to fuck a dry pussy

You came came out of the womb uncut you tardlet. Stop defending your parents shitty decisions.

actually, things are exactly opposite.

But enlighten me, what are the "objective facts" in favour of circumcision?

objective facts such as?

you have less sensitive skin with which to feel through. It also makes your dick drier which impacts pleasure as well, that's not subjective.

Uncomfortable facts: Every Jew ever born came out of their mum with an uncircumcised penis.

You cutfags refuse to acknowledge objective facts and instead defend yourselves with only ethical and subjective conjecture (i.e. its cleaner because i dont know how to wash ma dick ).

test

Plus nature doesn't just put things on your body for no reason (justifying said removal). If it needs a helmet, it gets a helmet. Nature doesn't care if you understand why.

Somewhere along the way, nature said "better put a helmet on all these dicks..." and some twat waffle at some point said "let's remove that"

just stop snipping dicks your cultist freaks
learn to use metric units while you're at it

Benefits of routine circumcision of infants outweigh the risks when it’s done by a medical professional. That’s the consensus us of the medical community. But since a lot of doctors are Jewish it doesn’t mean anything, right?

better not cut your hair, nature made it grow that long for a reason, you hippie.

That is not a consensus and you are picking and choosing facts to support the circumcision business.

better pull out your nails so it doesn't get dirty under them

Do you often fuck things with your hair? The penis is also an organ and not superfluous body hair.

american doctors recommend it to religious people because otherwise they would take kids to be snipped at their priest or whatever other sort of weirdo. Better make it a clean medical procedure than leave it to any nutjob with scissors

There are doctors all over the world though, and most of the world doesn't do it. Sure that's not what you'd call a consensus right

Doctors also recommend vaccinations and religious nut jobs refuse to get them. Why would religious people give a shit what a medical professional thinks?

Uncut to cutfag here:
After feeling both sides of the argument I would have to say that uncut was far superior in the sense of pleasure and relaxation.

Being cut only allows me to have a shower w/o having to pay attention to washing said areas.

If I had the choice I would 1000% go back to being uncut but “religious” gf at the time wanted me cut.

In conclusion: girls touched my dick wether it was cut or not

P.s: all you cut fags on here are on another level of bullshitery

>objective facts
Objective fact: phimosis is a rare condition, and phimosis that is so severe as to require circumcision is even rarer.

Objective fact: if you practice basic personal hygiene you won't have a problem with smegma or urinary infections.

Objective fact: wearing a condom will better protect you from STDs than removing your foreskin, and circumcision doesn't remove the need to wear a condom.

Objective fact: circumcision is genital mutilation by the medical definition: Disfigurement or injury by removal or destruction of any conspicuous or essential part of the body. The removal of the foreskin is objectively conspicuous.

Objective fact: circumcision can result in permanent damage to the penis and even death.

Objective fact: the foreskin contains a massive amount of nerve endings, which are stimulated through the motions of sex. It also allows the penis to smoothly glide into and out of the vagina, avoiding irritating friction that diminishes pleasure for both.

Objective fact: the foreskin protects the mucous membrane of the glans, keeping it soft and supple. The glans of a circumcised penis becomes keratinized over time causing it to irritate the vaginal mucosa during sex, which is one reason why people use artificial lube.

Objective fact: In the US circumcision was introduced explicitly as a way of preventing masturbation in boys and diminishing sexual pleasure. It was also advocated to perform the circumcision on boys without anesthetic so that they would associate the trauma with sex.

Objective fact: in all but the rarest of cases - e.g. extreme phimosis - there is no benefit to circumcision that cannot be obtained through taking a shower and wearing a condom.

Objective fact: circumcision irreversibly alters a boy's body without his consent or ability to comprehend the repercussions and without a medical need.

I thought you couldn't own niggas like that since 1865

I do not see any argument in favour of circumcision. You only said that it's better to have a doctor do it than a priest. But how is that better than simply NOT doing it?

/thread