Did we actually go to the moon?
I'm not a conspiracy theorist, really, because I haven't read up on it a whole lot, but it does seem rather curious that after NASA destroyed the equipment that took us to the moon in the 60's we haven't been able to rebuild it. I mean, the computers back then were equivalent to calculators, yet, supposedly we don't have the technology to go back? Wtf
Did we actually go to the moon?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtu.be
youtu.be
nbcnews.com
telegraph.co.uk
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
discord.
cia.gov
en.wikipedia.org
youtu.be
en.wikipedia.org
discord.plus
youtube.com
youtube.com
badastronomy.com
blogs.discovermagazine.com
apod.nasa.gov
apollo.sese.asu.edu
gbtimes.com
lpi.usra.edu
nasa.gov
spacenews.com
anyforums.com
twitter.com
We have the tech to go back. We had the tech to go there back then as well. It was a lot more dangerous back then because the computers were so limited that if they went out of range, the astronauts had to figure out how to get back on course by themselves. What is stopping us right now is reasons for going vs the cost of going.
Yes, we went to the Moon. We didn't go after Apollo 17 because that shit was EXPENSIVE. Instead, we went with Shuttle because it was supposed to be cheaper (protip: it wasn't). But by then, too much tribal knowledge was lost in how to manufacture the stuff.
It's literally impossible that NASA faked going to the Moon; they literally didn't have the technology to fake it.
youtu.be
Why is this guy lying, then?
It's funny, but true. Also, many pieces of "evidence" that the moon landings were faked are either made up, or taken out of context, like the van allen belt argument.
$57 million a day to NASA isn't enough?
so full of shit
No, employing that many qualified people costs a lot of money
To get views. We can land a rover on Mars. It's not much of a stretch to land a man on the moon with that same technology.
IIRC watch Saturn V launch cost about $1b in 1969 dollars.