Prove to me that anything exists outside of your mind

Again, it's not all in your head because there is more outside your mind than you can ever hope to experience or learn before it goes kaput, and it's kind of important to your mental development that you understand that.

Attached: ignorance pov.jpg (315x336, 28K)

That's a more accurate statement. Everything we know about this world has been filtered through our senses.

But that contradicts the notion of not being able to perceive if anything is outside of our own perception. Everything we know about this world has been filtered through our senses- it is assumed, if it is not fact. Filtered. So, there is a world out there that becomes filtered- there is something, an "out there", to distinguish being outside the intimate, intrinsic experience that seats you firmly in the place where you perceive yourself as a "mind".

You can't see what you can't see, sure. But you're definitely performing the act of seeing, not merely imagining. Concluding, not conjuring.

>Where does information come from?
Things that can express or deliver information, or the notion of information itself?
>Where would these other things learn from?
I'm not sure it's so mysterious. I've learned things on my own through trial and error, only to discover that someone had perfected the process long before I did.
>Surely the idea had to have originated somewhere?
It's necessary. But that doesn't mean the idea had to be the very first thing to have ever existed. Ideas can fail to exist now, and only come into existence far, far later.
>And if it originated in a mind, who’s to say it ever originated in one that wasn’t yours?
Well, I am. I did not know something I did not know yet. I cannot. I can try, and I cannot. In fact, I have never done so.

>then I’d ask you whether or not you believed objective reality exists at all
I find that there's no conceivable way for me to prove this, infallibly, to someone who cannot entertain it without fault. I cannot share my mind with them. However, I also find that I have no reason to doubt such a thing. I have nothing to lose either way, but the world is much more consistent under an objective reality.

I perceive self. I perceive that i had thought. There is boundry between first and second perception. Things occur sequentially. I cannot return to the same point as first perception. Sequence occurs in one direction. Direction towards what? Towards "then"

Time exists as physical truth outside of perception. I have proven there is more than perception to universe Time cannot be the only thing thing in universe other than perception.

Your knowledge of your own existence demonstrates that something exists outside my mind--namely, you. I imagine you meant to ask, prove to me that something exists outside my mind, in which case I'd point out that asking the question assumes that there's someone to answer it.

https:\\discordapp.com\invite\8qeq9Xn

-pc9

Attached: file 10.jpg (800x600, 56K)

Based and Idealistic

what's the point in asking? all these answers were concieved by you. the spoon does not exist.

Fuck solipsism.