Gun, just ban them. It's that simple.
Gun, just ban them. It's that simple
Drugs ... just ban them. Simple.
How did that work out for stopping drug use?
finally someone with common sense
Murder, ban it ... simple.
Yeah, that helped a lot.
Criminal do not abide by laws and bans. and since police can't get to my house faster than a burglars bullet will hit my wife ... I'll keep my guns thank you.
Imagine all the mass shootings if the gunman would have been met by somebody with a gun. different story altogether, perhaps better ending even.
Shooting the people that want to ban them, is also common sense. We keep our guns and you're dead so you don't have to concern yourselves with our rights and property anymore. Everybody's happy.
But if we ban them then they can't get them which means they can't shoot anyone.
Just ban bad guys. Problem solved libtards.
There are many countries that put heavy restrictions and pretty much banned guns, like Japan and Norway for example.
Americans just need to lose their hard on for guns. I know its cool to play make believe as spy kids or whatever, but you really dont need assault rifles in your homes
Totally worked for drugs, I agree.
haven't had enough attention for one day? Give it a rest, cuck.
Not exactly true. They are heavily restricted, but even before that, murders via firearms or other methods just wasn’t that common in either nation, because both nations are primarily inhabited by their indigenous people’s rather than mixed ethnicities, as well as having vastly different societal cultures than say Mexico - which firearms are also heavily restricted yet the firearm homicide rate dwarfs the US’s rate.
It’s a matter of culture - in the US, overwhelmingly blacks commit more murders per capita towards other blacks than any other ethnicity.
They are the ones who bring our firearm homicides per 1000 up.
Banning guns is the easy part.
The hard part is stopping the gangs, government protected officials, murderers, lunatics, rapists and school shooters from taking over. Without legal gun owners America would be FUCKED in less than 25 years.
Good lucking finding and confiscating all 300 million firearms in private hands in America.
any pro gun civilian arguing online lacks basic understanding of society and the roles of individuals. You are not a hero in disguise, you are a potential danger to everyone around you.
Japan and Norway also don't have black on black crime.
The right to own guns is that. A RIGHT.
Its the second amendment, only slightly less important than free speech. But more important than the 5th which helps legally protect people who are wrongly accused.
When you take away one right how easy is it to take away another?
Look at the UK. It has similar demographics to the US population wise.
They banned guns but now knife and acid attack crime is insane.
Then they started arresting people for saying things. Even stupid memes or not liking or agreeing with something is means for being arrested.
You never want to get rid of a right. Other ones will follow.
Bringing up Mexico, even if the US passed really strict gun control, what would stop the cartels from bringing in the finest weapons to fall off the back of a Mexican army truck? Or setting up small machine shops to churn out Lutys? They currently have no issue producing and smuggling all sorts of drugs, and traffic people. Any gun control types have an answer for that?
By that rationale, if you own a car you’re a danger for drunk or distracted driving, if you own a knife you’re a danger for knife attacks, if you own a baseball bat you’re a danger for assault with a deadly weapon, etc.
Don’t pretend all of these things don’t take lives yearly when used illegally.
just because something is defined as a right, doesn't mean society can't change their opinions on it. These rights are defined by some people centuries ago.
if these 'rights' became potential harm to a stable society, then it shouldn't exist.
Just like how the Nazi Germany also defined birthing rights, where only the whites are allowed to exist with full citizenship. It was harmful. So it is no longer a right. The same should apply to guns.
Well I know that the guns that Obama and Holder allowed to be smuggled into Mexico was used to kill not only US citizens but hundreds if not thousands of Mexicans by now.
I agree. Except I believe the capability of destruction and the frequency of guns related violence outweighs all of the tools that currently exist.
I also believe that if a tool has no social use outside of killing should be seriously restricted.
wrong. Go be a communist someplace else.
You’re right.
Stop using the internet right now with your freedom of speech because your right to speak your mind can cause distress and potential suicide in people who are in poor mental health.
By your two examples you're either a moron or a delightfully fun troll.
You mean Norway with the Breivik 2011 Workers' Youth League summer camp attack after increased restictions in 2009 or Japan with the 1995 Tokyo subway Sarin attack that killed over a dozen.
Heavy restrictions on guns don't stop people who are motivated to kill.
No it isn't retard
wrong. Communists get helicopter rides.
Let me ask you this - how many people have ever been killed with a firearm during the shooting sports competitions during the Olympics?
I’ll wait for you to conveniently move your goal posts now...
hey man im here to talk.
Tell me how you see this issue and lets discuss.
Apparently one of those "fast & furious" guns even made it over to France and was used in those big Paris nightclub shootings a few years back.
I would say I’m surprised, but I’m not.
Cases of terrorism and mass-murder in those two countries are very rare. In fact, arent those the only cases in the last couple decades?
Compare that with the amount of mass shootings and murders that happen. Yes people will still kill without guns, why would you want to make it so much easier for them?
Over your dead body, commie.
amount of mass shootings and murders that happen in the *US
If you don't like guns, then move somewhere that doesn't have them. Otherwise shut your mouth. The burgers and the swiss are not going to give our guns up no matter how many whiny threads you make.
Guns don’t make it easier just noisier. You still have to have proficiency with them - this isn’t the movies where someone can just pick up a gun and get headshots all day long while jumping, sliding and diving around.
That shit doesn’t work that way in real life, ever.
You don't need any self defense goy, it's not like a person can just walk down a public street carrying a sign that says "WHITE GENOCIDE NOW!"
while it is true these are both considered rights in US, their importance shouldnt be weighed equally. Free press in needed for the overall progression of humanity and should remain as the foundation of the western world. However, the rights of gun ownership are in comparison, is backwards thinking and lacks sufficient beneficial effects in modern world.
The Swiss may not have a choice. Correct me if I'm wrong but I don't think they have a costitutional right to guns so they could easily be taken any time.
criminals dont go to the gunstore.. they can get them.
>That shit doesn't work that way in real life
Get good.
its interesting why ppl are so hateful to whites. it is almost as if they hog all social resources and maintain their power through class division and racial tension.
Will we still be allowed to own guns when our masters in Israel require us to go there and kill their enemies?
helicopters are cool.
removing the tools people use to uphold the NAP only gives power to those who wish to break it.
Nigger.
Tell me more about these (((white))) people and the terrible things they do?
Stop moving goalposts - a right is a right. It exists by the act of our birth here in the country - it’s not granted by the government - anything giving is a privilege and not a right.
The Constitution does not grant these rights to us, it limits the power of the federal government to take these rights we were born with away.
If you cannot understand that, we’re done “discussing” your proposal because you’re a dangerous authoritarian fascist, and I really don’t have anything to do with them.
360 no scope newb!
I'm not familiar with white atrocities, could you post some images showing what they've done?
Oooh give me back my rifle
Oh give me back my gun
Give me back my home in Texas
And my rambling days are done
lol, at least you are worth a laugh
honestly i dont understand these antisemitic ideologies. If you are going to outsource the instability and anger of a nation somehwere, at least do it to a worthy nation, like Soviet, or China. At least it looks logical. Aiming the power at Israel seems pointless and lacks enough attraction for fear-mongering tactics
impractical for a number of reasons
I also can't imagine why anyone would have any sort of animosity towards Israel.
Based
Mystery to me.
stick to ruining your own country mohummad. bongs banned guns and now they cant even look at porn fuck you niggers
The day that Jewish tricks will be revealed is coming
or the millions of shooting ranges. Then their are the millions of hunters. There are accidents, but less fatalities then fishing even. I actually have never heard of someone who grew up shooting guns and respecting them shooting up a school. It is always some pussy city kid.
soft up the name calling. I hate fascists with a passion, but it just seems unreasonable to link a tool designed to kill to freedom of speech, and treat them as equal. I understand your fear of authoritarian government. But look at the democratic countries that banned guns. They seem to function fine without it. Frankly I support the banning of guns because im sick and tired of these massacres happening in our country, and banning it appears to be the fastest and most efficient solution.
I have heard of one murder at a gun range (mother shot her son on purpose) and some suicides - that’s it.
Once again - how many people have ever been killed during the shooting sports portion of the Olympics?
>look at the democratic countries that banned guns
Enjoy getting imprisoned for Facebook posts, retard.
thats terrible news. I hope they got what they deserved. But if you say this is a 'jew' problem, there will be crazies out there arguing the shooting in NZ is a 'white' problem. Race should be the very last thing to conclude when facing a controversial issue.
Never thought I would see a liberal post on this shit. Nice
If you don't like to live in a country that has guns, leave.
The Founders of our country explicitly disallowed the government not to infringe on the right to bear arms the 2nd fundamental right only underneath freedom of speech.
It's your Natural Right to have a gun.
no
.
.
.
Not that many. But not everyone is as sane and professional as olympiad athletes. As long as this tool is easily obtained and made readily available to the public, you are planting unneeded danger into society.
if you are going to shit on my opinions, at least give me some contexts. I can't change my mind until you give me something better to believe in.
I think that one is fake
I don't want people to dismiss people who criticize Jews simply because of 1 mistake
Retards don't usually change their minds.
Ha
>pic related
Good point. So much info against these creatures, it's unnecessary to make anything up.
wow you got a lot here. I don't have this many supportive details to my claim, and to be fair the things said in these posts are truly horrifying and inhuman. But until I can somehow verify these are truth, imma have to stay neutral.
Why not go find out for yourself?
ok. Retards don't know how to respond normally to something outside of their brain capacity. Just hit me with your thoughts on it. Generally interested in conversation, otherwise i wouldnt waste my time replying.
What evidence are you looking for?
Ok I'm glad you are open minded.
Is the only reason you want to ban guns because of all the supposed mass shootings?
My thoughts: try to take my rights and I'll take your life.
I still don't believe a race has a specific agenda to conquer the world. It sounds too much like a crazy conspiracy than actual fact.
but ill take a look.
0
The number of Olympians and spectators ever killed during the shooting sports portion of the Olympics whether its Biathlon, skeet or clays, or target shooting is 0.
Your position was using absolutes - guns exist only to kill.
I have pointed out just one instance that no deaths have ever occurred when using a firearm, and that is over 120 years of games.
If you want to take into account how many people attend gun ranges daily, with no murders, you’re looking into the millions yearly across world in just law enforcement and military alone using ranges.
99.95% of gun owners never use their firearms in an illegal manner - we have decades of data supporting it through CDC reports, FBI reports, and shooting sports figures for hunting and competition shooting figures.
Stop being an asshole and blaming everyone else for the acts of a very, very small portion (less than .001%) of citizenry misusing shit.
If we were to go that route, you’d not own anything because computers, cars, clothing, ropes, knives, bats, telephones, etc. have all been used in murders and other crimes before.
Gun control fag
Why does it have to be conquering the world that crosses your line, how well does murdering live babies to harvest their parts sit with you?
Maybe find this man and ask him why?
Prohibition sure worked out great for us Americans
>being this much of a brainlet to think the other people are the brainlets
What could go wrong by removing a citizen's right to protect themselves and the ones they love?
alright now we talking. I agree some of the bases of our nation is built upon shouldnt messed with. But the 2nd amendment we have currently lacks regulations to some of the modern problems. If we could add or rework these rights so they cover the new problems. it could benefit both sides of the politic game.
This but unironically. No one would pull the trigger if everyone could pull the trigger back. Give every man, woman and child a fucking gun. Fine them for not carrying.
What problems? If we removed niggers, mudslimes, spic's and Jews (majority of school shooters) from gun statistics, we would find more people die from choking on hot dogs than guns.
>let you call others brain let's to hide
>But the 2nd amendment we have currently lacks regulations to some of the modern problems. If we could add or rework these rights so they cover the new problems. it could benefit both sides of the politic game.
Name 1 regulation that we already don't have that would fix your perceived problems.
Just 1.
We already have background checks.
We already have limited round capacity.
We already banned full auto weapons.
You have to have a permit for many guns.
You don't know what you are talking about.
Guns aren't going to be outlawed in any of our lifetimes, OP. SCOTUS has decided against restrictive firearm measures every time it's brought before them. The vast majority of military personnel & combat veterans, law enforcement members are ardently pro-2nd Amendment.
As far as using the military against U.S. civilians ,that is expressly forbidden under federal law :
Whoever, except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress, willfully uses any part of the Army or the Air Force as a posse comitatus or otherwise to execute the laws shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.
Knott Amendment
Additionally, the vast majority of Americans - qround 87% - oppose outlawing private ownership of firearms. As a matter of fact, gun ownership is at it's highest right now than at any time in U.S. history.
TL;DR - I know it's the authoritarian far left extremist's wet dream to repeal the 2nd Amendment since they realize it, along with the Posse Comitatus Act & the fact that the vast majority of military, law enforcement support the 2nd Amendment - stand in their way of absolute control of the U.S. But you'll grow old & die before it ever has a chance of occurring
How about we just add or rework the rest of our rights while we're at it. Hell, get rid of that outdated right to live. Problem solved. No one dies if no one's alive, right? That's what you're pushing towards, whether or not you realize it, by trying to take our right to bear arms. If we can fuck with one right, none of them are sacred.
>Just ban it
Its that easy
Daily Reminder most gun crime is caused by a few races
Thank you! This is great. I absolutely agree with you. I just wish some of the racists in this post can grasp even just a glimpse your thought process. I acknowledge that I was stating some absolutes during my statements, and to be honest that is what guns appeared to me before your reply. I now can somewhat understands the frustrations gun owners must be having with this issue.
however I still find that the small portion of retards who might go berzerk any seconds is frightening, more so when I know they might possess something that kills anyone in an instant.
Perhaps better mental health checkup?
That’s stupid you’re stupid
Without wall or something else to protect our massive borders, the only difference outlawing guns will make is that law abiding citizens will be the only ones who don't have them.
WE KNOW IT'S YOU JEWS, WE ARE AWARE
Day of the ____ is coming.
THIS IS WHO STARTED THIS THREAD. THIS IS WHO WANTS TO REMOVE YOUR GUNS. /THREAD
Tentacle?
Everyone forgets about the mass shootings and robberies stopped by armed civilians you know why?
It’s good news people remember 40 killed in New Zealand
Meanwhile for life
Local man stops terrorist plot gets praised for a week then we obsess about Kim K’s ass or something else Retarded
Yes it is.
"Apocalypse" means to reveal in Greek.
We remember a LOT of things...
Durrr me strong man me shoot bad guy back me not shit me pants and cry like a bitch in actual situation nope nu uh
interesting. Then what is the cause behind all of the mass shootings? Not enough reinforcement of the regulations?
Oh I absolutely agree on better mental health funding and law changes.
It shouldn’t take as long as it does to get someone who is a legitimate danger to themselves and others adjudicated in court and remanded into psychiatric care as it does. The minute you turn 18, its damn near impossible to force someone into psychiatric care if they don’t want it.
a LOT of things
Who the fuck cares what this nation was built upon you people are so retarded its like not getting rid of shit stained underwear because it has sentimental value fuck off
Not everyone's a baby like you, libtard.
>lol im on ur side man. I dont see the reasons behind keeping backwards regulations. I was stating that things like freedom of speech should be considered separately from gun control.
What is the cause? Criminals are scum and no amount of oppressing lawful citizens is going to change a criminal's ways.
Your argument is basically "bad things happen. ban the instrument used during the bad thing."
Way more deaths happen from car crashes than mass shootings.
Do we ban cars?
You could say cars are a utility that is too valuable to ban in a society.
But an armed population of citizens serves a utility as well. The whole point of the 2nd amendment is to prevent an oppressive government from happening.
You could say "that's retarded..."
But this has happened before in US history.
Cool. Give up your right to life, your life is shit anyway.
>letting people defend their lives
>backwards
No
that went depressing real fast. I respect your opinions, but I still see stricter gun control is an effective and rapid solution to a serious issue.
In terms of stopping criminals from conducting harm, I feel like they wouldn't have caused a massive chaos if they had any other forms of weapons. Guns are way to deadly and dangerous to be possessed by these fuckers.
Until a more effective selection process can be implemented, stopping access to it seems to be the most effective one.
sub to pewdiepie
While in the REAL world, there are around 100,000 incidents of firearm owners using firearms to protect themselves against violent offenders in the U.S. annually. So while I understand that basement swelling obese incel leftists typically curl into the fetal balls shitting themselves in fear, not everyone's as weak as you.
npr.org
I dont get it
This would not stop suicidal mass shooters. Like at all.
Banning drugs has not stopped or even slowed down the black market for dealers and smugglers into the United States.
Unless you are absolutely straight laced, I can almost bet you money that either you have used a drug dealer before or known someone who has, and likely has at least experiemented with an illegal narcotic.
Now, apply that same logic to arms smuggling and you’ll find that it will be just as bad as it is now for firearms crimes as it is for drug crimes even if they’re banned.
no, it's not.
diy guns?
black market guns?
my guns?
We stop their access by doing thorough background checks (which we already are supposed to do) OR we catch them before they act or even remove their desire to murder their fellow men by increasing taxes to pay for a psychologist for everyone or some gay shit like that. Banning guns isn't going to work unless you have some magic gun erasing wand and I think you'd have waved it around already if you did. A ban on guns is just words on paper to anyone who really wants someone dead and it'll only hurt law-abiding citizens.
Sure but wouldn't it be more effective for them to just shoot themselves?
Statistics show that every country with strict gun laws has reduced weapons related crimes, murders and deaths. But you know, follow the same logic as the anti vax crowd and keep defending lax gun laws.
I don't think we have a real big problem with this. Go visit the lower class and middle class, they pop out babies left and right.
Sure kid.
drugs are not yet, kinda in a good place in life right now. But I can understand the deeper social impact illegal markets would bring.
But there must be a solution, If not banning guns. No gun-related massacre should ever happen again. The effectiveness of destructions these guns have is terrifying.
see
Take away Blacks from those statistics and they wouldnt.
What statistics? Site them Jew.
DON'T FORGET ABOUT CHRISTCHURCH GOYIM!!!
Oh, you mean like the UK - where knife related deaths have skyrocketed in recent years after virtually banning ownership of firearms - let alone using firearms for self defense? Nice try, junior. Any other lies to spew, lil fella?
bbc.com
he is fuking all the pussy he sees and u know they are all white
NEW ZEALAND GOYIM!!!
What's your point?
kek
US civil war when?
NOT UNTIL THEY TAKE OUR GUNS
the assaulthe assault weapons ban of 1995 worked well
Can not disagree with this hypocrite.
I can. Fuck him with an AK
I’m not Republican and I like guns.
Also ban murder
How, as a woman, do you stop a buck nigger without a gun?
It needs to happen sooner
Immigration will cause it
> Constitution
> Fundamental rights
> Japan is full of faggots
Texting and driving is literally the number one cause of teenage deaths.
>Potential harm?
Ban cellphones?
you must have a small penis
Japan is full of japnese with the quarantined Korean expats being kept far away from the actual civilizations
You also need to think of their respective cultures. They have different childhoods and structure from a young age unlike Tyrone that has no hope and no parents
Join the official /pol/ server
Join and have some fun with us user!
Luv u ~
discord .. gg /
U6GcUmU
Wrong. Every adult must maintain their weapon and weapon proficiency. They are required by law to have a military rifle. They go back to the true meaning of militia i.e. every adult can be called upon at anytime for defence.
Until the MS-13 plebe wants to make his mark and fucks and kills your mother and sister while you bleed out on the porch.
Anti-funs are some serious masochist huh
of course it is
Knives, just ban them. It's that simple
I trust rifles in the hands of the south and rural farmers
First thing they taught me in school was tyranny is bad mmmm'kay
The faster that OP's hope for his firearm free 'utopia' are crushed and he finally eventually an heros like the nigger he is the better
ban yourself from life and i'll melt down my AR
discord
[lb]-+-l6l-+-[dl]
.gg/vvftDyy
Yeah it that simple...
when some nigger gang comes into your house @ 0200 with a mission to fuck your wife and kill you both after they are done
If you are a cuck..you film it and make money posting that shit ojn porn sites.....
If you are THE ALPHA MALE...you get a bunch of dead niggers for the police to clean up
Me I prefer the cops cleaning up dead niggers
You fucks should thanks Thorazine I don't kill you all
Ah, the classic "you have a tiny dick" ad hominem
Trust the government and those in power, you don't need to protect yourself.
Men with guns are Citizens, men without guns are Subjects
sounds like the problem would be solved if we got rid of the niggers instead
>using Nazi germany as an example
>Germans disarmed jews and stripped their rights away.
You're forgetting that it can get much worse.
>"But that can't happen again. First world countries would never strip our rights away."
>what is the UK, Sweden, Canada, Australia, France, Modern Germany, Denmark
Things can and will get worse.
You seem to forget that when the common folk no longer have a legal means to defend themselves criminals will run rampant.
Its happening in the UK because police don't have the training and means to take them down and deal with the sheer number of things.
>stop using the UK as an example.
Chicago is another one. Guns are for the most part illegal there. The police haven't done shit about the crime there and the south side of Chicago is a near war zone.
You forget America is a large place with a lot of talented criminals. Making guns is in our history. Not to mention a few rogue men with a little know how and rogue CNC machines will continue to make bans ineffective.
Guns in the hands of good people wind up doing more good than harm. If the news published every self defense story you would see how often people defend themselves. But no the liberal news gets a great narrative from "more shootings guns bad"
Ye, fucking government used inner cities to fund their proxy wars by selling drugs. Still has a lasting effect to this day. Thanks uncle sam.
This is where ignorance becomes bliss. You cite Japan yet fail to acknowledge that crime rates with other weapons rose.
True, they have less gun crimes, but now thy just drive their van into a schoolyard full of kids, jump out and stab them all to death. Gun crime went down, but violence went up ... by the numbers alone.
You cannot legislate the evil out of the world, it has never worked that way, and never will. The best immediate goal would be to restore the balance of good and evil. You cannot accomplish this by handcuffing the good.
>People murder at greater rates when nobody punishes people for it
So it does work, reductively. Nothing is 100% effective. Nobody would suggest unbanning murder because 'it doesn't work'
>People did drugs at a greater rate when they were legal
You do know that the per-capita consumption of alcohol plummeted during the prohibition, right? Just because SOME of those who currently use a legal item legally would continue to seek out and use it when it's illegal to do so at all, does NOT mean everyone would. In particular, firearms are selected for suicide most often for reasons of ease of access compared to effectiveness.
>If you own a car you are considered a potential hazard to all those around you and, due to the number of deaths and injuries caused by vehicle owners, as well as the rate at which owners are accountable, use and ownership of such dangerous objects are heavily restricted, including licensing, and mandatory registration
Why not guns?
DID SOMEBODY SAY JAPAN??
Behold, the M134. Firing an average of 4,000 freedoms per minute!
Why not just go ahead and ban murder stupid
Social use...
Lets see...
I have tons of fun with my friends going shooting.
I hunt with my friends and family. Even if I don't kill its still a reason to go out and enjoy nature.
I talk gun stuff with friends and share my exploits and new acquisitions.
I attend gun shows to see new gun innovations and I always do so with friends.
I like how they work mechanically and how they influenced history and developed alongside society and for different needs.
Its hard to explain it to somebody who isn't part of it. But its GUN CULTURE. Its culture. Its why we want to retain it. Its as American as Apple Pie.
As for shootings and crime... Maybe of we cracked down a little harder on societal issues creating all these criminals from broken families and properly funding and managing asylums and putting people there who need to be there once again... Maybe... Just maybe we can fix things.
What can happen:
Ottoman Turkey (1915 - 1917) - 1-1.5 million Armenians murdered after gun surrender/confiscation. 4,000 Armenians who defied the confiscation order survived the genocide by repulsing Turkish attacks until British and French forces rescued them.
Soviet Union (1929 - 1953) - 20 million anti-Stalinists murdered after firearm registration (1918) was followed by a ban (1918). Communist Party members were exempt from the ban.
Nazi-Germany (1933 - 1945) - 13 million Jews, gypsies, and anti-Nazis murdered. A 1928 law required a permit to own or purchase firearms or ammunition, 1931 that law was made more strict, and in 1938 a complete ban on firearm ownership by Jews was enacted. The only Jews who stood a chance (though eventually being defeated), were the armed Jews in the Warsaw ghetto.
China (1966 - 1976) - 1 million (some estimates reach 30 million) anti-Communists were murdered (most through starvation). 1912 firearms laws required permits for firearm ownership. In 1957 a complete ban was issued leaving Chinese peasants completely vulnerable.
Guatemala (1960 - 1981) - 100,000 Mayans were slaughtered. Due in large part to the military's monopoly of force, and onerous gun permitting laws, the availability of firearms doomed insurgent Mayans trying to reclaim the democratic government which failed in 1954.
Uganda (1971 - 1979) - 300,000 (mostly-Christian) Ugandans were murdered by ~25,000 ill-trained and ill-disciplined soldiers. The genocide likely could have been averted if guns had not been banned in 1969.
Cambodia (1975) - Pol Pot murdered ~1 million educated persons. After inheriting French colonial gun control laws (which limited firearms to one per hunter) and taking power, the Khmer Rouge went door-to-door collecting all weapons. This led to the most efficient genocide of the modern era.
There are other examples. Too many to mention.
This is what happens when you give up your arms to defend yourself... tyrant gov't takes over..
>Free press is needed for global progression.
>Free press.
No, none of this corporations are people too bullshit.
Freedom of the press is not a right in and of itself. Where as an individuals right to freedom of expression is.
And in the modern world due to censorship and companies like Google, Facebook, and Twitter... Which control the media in which we communicate.
We have less freedom than ever before.
News sites and channels that go against the 'progressive' norm are silence by demonitization, algorithm shuffling, and forced removal (even by their service providers).
So how dare you spout nonsense of freedom of press. Press has no freedom.
Only what those in power wish to write or make popular.
Fuck the fuck off you lankity smokestack cocksplinter
This
Its not that hard
gtfo CIA ziojew zog motherfucker
You will only take guns from the good people because it will be easier to enslave them when the time comes.
FUCK YOU
Criminals buy guns on the black market anyway, you think a drug dealer has a license for his gun??
Go fucking shoot yourself in the head you fucking pussy and suck on your jewish overlords dick.
Just make everyone sign a contact to not murder.
There, problem solved
Come to my house and say that you little bitch.
Gun, just ban them. It's that simple.
discord
[lb]-I-l5l-I-[dl]
.gg/vvftDyy
Not an argument
Don’t need one, try to take them and we will kill you. Simple enough?
I think it's about high time to dedicate this thread to something more productive like firearms appreciation
Does nobody realize this is a troll who has posted this thread twice??
No
Trolls need to learn their place too.
You must suck a lot of penis.
Not anymore it ain't
>gun, just ban them. it's that simple.
Never ceases to amaze me how mentally undeveloped libtards are.
discord
[lb]-I-l5l-I-[dl]
.gg/vvftDyy
In Japan the main reason there's less violence is that people straight up aren't doing as much violence. It's not that they can't, they just don't.
Look at their bike security practices: bike theft isn't low because all the thieves get their hands chopped off or because they have robot dildo heated bike locks, they just leave their bikes out and nobody steals them because what kind of delinquent would steal a bike? That would be wrong.
The only argument pro gun douches can concoct is "but muh guns" or "but muh rights" and its just laughable
Well the US could do the same thing if it wasn’t for pansy ass liberals saying “prisoners have rights!” And spewing human rights violations bullshit! Hey at least we don’t have vending machines with dirty panties in them.
Somyou like the idea of getting ass raped by your government and not being able to do a damn thing about it. Huh, I knew libtards like to be fudge packers but I didn’t think they where so serious about it. Fuck off Shil.