Here's the "report" titled "REPLACEMENT MIGRATION" on the UN's OWN WEBSITE :

Here's the "report" titled "REPLACEMENT MIGRATION" on the UN's OWN WEBSITE :
un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/ageing/replacement-migration.asp

MSM sources who claim that this is a "conspiracy theory"
duckduckgo.com/?q=replacement migration conspiracy THEORY times&t=h_&iar=news&ia=news

This document is from 2001.
Draw your own conclusions.

Attached: replacement6.png (2276x2081, 1.75M)

Other urls found in this thread:

un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/ageing/replacement-migration.asp
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Attached: 1553177191397.png (1024x398, 532K)

Attached: 1553176997010.jpg (1242x1241, 217K)

Attached: stop breeding whitey.jpg (1013x537, 111K)

Attached: caravan.jpg (1196x800, 208K)

kill yourself stormnigger

Don't you like evidence? Why?

Attached: comic.png (2700x3213, 1.34M)

Don't care, i'm white anyways, not my problem if they're setting up the world to fail.

Because youre casting it as a racist plan to replace white people when, not only does it list some non white countries, even, as at risk for population decline, they're suggesting it as a solution and preventative measure t total economic collapse.

An aging generation and low birth rate is catastrophic to an economy user, it can destroy countries.

Replacement migration is a viable solution, one that's already happening. But that doesn't mean there's some crazy evil scheme to destroy the white man... First world countries experience greatly slowed birth rates, this is common.. migration is usually the best and only solution because you can't say to a population "eyo, fuck more!"

If they found a way to entice people to have more kids I'll bet you there's a UN report on that, too.

The UN may have free speech

But as they say, free speech doesn't mean freedom from the consequences

Attached: briefist.gif (320x192, 1.95M)

>Evidence
>No MS Paint tier arrows and circles on any of the pictures

Attached: 1416411012613.png (500x374, 250K)

>If they found a way to entice people to have more kids I'll bet you there's a UN report on that, too.
White people are being told to not have kids.

Attached: 1d840cb0292ab7f266da2cf63b57756fb98b92c9093d9a6f8892c68502ad3b78.png (500x404, 229K)

So you agree that "replacement migration" is not a "far right conspiracy theory"?
So why do the mainstream media claim that it is?
And you agree that "replacement migration" is actually happening?
So why do the mainstream media claim that it isn't?
Have you ever questioned why the economy needs perpetual growth?
You do realise that perpetual growth is physically impossible, right?
For the UN's own definition of genocide search UN resolution 96 article 2.
If you want to justify genocide for economic reasons, then that is your right, but at least be honest and upfront about it.

Attached: mail.png (1406x643, 571K)

un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/ageing/replacement-migration.asp

Are you too stupid to realize the difference between replacement as a means of upholding the economy and replacement as a conspiracy theory?

Milk makes your bones strong, vs. Jews are forcing you to drink milk for strong bones because they hate soda manufacturers.

Replacing a population that is naturally shrinking due to economic strangulation, in the name of propping up the economy, is pure kike subversion.

You're framing it wrong is the issue. You're making it out like it's a conspiracy to kill white people, when it's a solution to our economy about to implode because we won't have kids...

They're not reacting because you're wrong about replacement migration. They're reacting because you're acting like they're legit attempting to commit genocide. That is no ones intention. This is about us not having major humanitarian crisis.

Look at Japan, they have people literally just dropping dead from overwork. That's where we're heading. And you'll also notice, Japan, (a non white country), is on their list of countries targetted for replacement migration
Not because they want to annhilate the Japanese, but because they kind of want the Japanese to stop fucking literally dying from overwork. It's a very real humanitarian crisis.

You ignored all my questions and are now resorting to playground insults.
Nobody mentioned Jews except you.
I'll repeat them. Try again.
>So you agree that "replacement migration" is not a "far right conspiracy theory"?
>So why do the mainstream media claim that it is?
>And you agree that "replacement migration" is actually happening?
>So why do the mainstream media claim that it isn't?
>Have you ever questioned why the economy needs perpetual growth?
>You do realise that perpetual growth is physically impossible, right?
>For the UN's own definition of genocide search UN resolution 96 article 2.
If you want to justify genocide for economic reasons, then that is your right, but at least be honest and upfront about it.

Attached: post.png (1406x643, 601K)

Seniors cost a mother fuck tonne of money, user. Your next option is to start culling them. Which wouldn't quite fit the definition of genocide, but by targeting a single group based on one common factor and euthanizing them? Ya, basically the same thing.

Attached: 0291565362.jpg (1016x1476, 83K)

This

>>Have you ever questioned why the economy needs perpetual growth?
>>You do realise that perpetual growth is physically impossible, right?
>>For the UN's own definition of genocide search UN resolution 96 article 2.

Have you ever questioned why the economy needs perpetual growth?
You do realise that perpetual growth is physically impossible, right?
For the UN's own definition of genocide search UN resolution 96 article 2.

You have a pot of salt. Every time you use 1 gram of salt you REPLACE it with 1 gram of pepper. What is the end result?

Attached: times.png (1406x643, 906K)

It's not.. genocide...
They aren't trying to prevent white births. If 1st world birthrates increase to sustainable.levels they'd withdraw this.

You're making a huge fucking leap of logic here. You are allowed to have as many kids as you want. No one will stop you from having ten if you so choose.

They're addressing a phenomenon that is already occuring.

You are not being prevented from having children..
And you aren't salt you fool. Your world view dictates you're salt and immigrants are pepper. It's just more fucking people.
You're replacing table salt with himalayan salt. Its a different colour, but its still fucking salt. You're just kind of an idiot.

No, the correct option is to stop paying people chicken feed to do 5 people's jobs. The only 'crisis' looming for a shrinking population is to 1%er's bottom lines. They want cheap and debt free labor from third world countries, that are proven for generation to not rebel against their masters, be fucked everything else.

The stop is money. It comes down to after outsourcing every type of labor we also outsource making kids because locally most can't afford big families anymore.

There are swaths of studies across swaths of nations that'll show you... Poor people have more kids.
It's not a wealth thing.

A rich well off family is more likely to have an only child or none.. and a poor family is more likely to have 3+

First world country birth rates drop for precisely this reason.

For the UN's own definition of genocide search UN resolution 96 article 2.
>You are allowed to have as many kids as you want.
See pic at >You're replacing
So you agree that REPLACEMENT *is* taking place then?

Attached: 1541253416930.jpg (500x725, 156K)

The UN report called "REPLACEMENT MIGRATION" was issued in 2001. They've had 18 years+ to avert this. They chose REPLACEMENT.

Attached: replacement4.png (2000x1557, 1.05M)

That comparison is stupid as fuck. They compare different countries with different cultures.

Whatever people in africa do has fuck all to do with how people react in france or italy.
If you look actually at the people in those places then you find amost the top people have at least 2-3 kids while the native poor fucks have less.

No, they don't, they compare different wealth classes in the same countries as well... It's a very, very consistent phenomenon.

Yes. But it isn't genocide. Because it isn't to target and eliminate white people. Not a single law or action has occurred that prevents white people from having children. Our birth rate is low and that is that.

You are more than welcome to pump out a billion kids. No law will prevent you.

But you aren't. So to avoid total economic implosion, they're encouraging immigration, so that you and I do not, like the Japanese, work ourselves literally to death trying to keep up with a top heavy economy.

Feminists are so indocrinated by the lies they're fed every day that they won't believe evidence when its right in front of their face.

There's something about women and how they can't admit they're ever wrong.

Even when you tell them the truth they'll just cry and think they're the victim and the next day they'll just keep believe what they've always believed.

Attached: 1552714087288.jpg (300x420, 14K)

>Poor people have more kids. It's not a wealth thing.
The government pays for those kids. WE pay for those kids. WE are told to have a four year education, transportation, a steady job, the perfect mate and a large house in a safe neighborhood before we have kids.

>Feminists are so indocrinated by the lies they're fed every day that they won't believe evidence when its right in front of their face.
>There's something about women and how they can't admit they're ever wrong.
>Even when you tell them the truth they'll just cry and think they're the victim and the next day they'll just keep believe what they've always believed.
Isn't this why Hillary lost?
Hillaryland was just too tightly knit of a girls club to ever admit any wrong, and thus were never able to learn from mistakes.

Avg kids among the rich is higher than avg nation wide. Explain that in your model of poor =more kids.

It's simply factual that wages less than 1/3 compared to 50 years ago. Translated: you could earn more parttime at a gas station than you can earn with a masters degree today. It's factually way harder to finance the same live style and that's why people had to go down. Most are struggling to have a career today to get enough money while it was piss easy before.

Exactly what I'm saying.... They're expensive. I misspoke that one part of my whole post but the rest should have been very clear

We don't get to pick who become president