The vast majority of his critics are just too stupid to understand his arguments

Just fuck off, you are a prime example of the exact type of idiot, who doest listen to his full arguments

Stop using this hypothetical as a crutch and address his actual arguments you lazy cuck

I don't care what you think. It was asked what our problem with him is. He believes in a specific god as if it were real. That's my problem with him.

What's his position on Israel, again?

He believes that without religion society will become full of nihilistic suicidal babies. This is mainly because he contributes western civilizations success to Christian values. Even if I don't agree with this small subset of his opinions, I really enjoy listening to his debates and he is a very articulate and clear speaker and there need to be more of him in the world.

Cheerleading NPCs happy about the pointless non-argument.
Rekt indeed. Guess we're done talking.

If he believes something so utterly ridiculous, insane and misguided I can't take his opinion seriously on anything else, he has a huge gap in his logic there so why wouldn't he in other places

He is still a libcuck his ONLY saving grace are free speech and anti "hurrr womunnzzz is opressed". I am smart enough to agree with him on those.

he’s never read anything remotely related to “postmodernism” and gets his info on it from a conspiracy theorist no philosopher takes seriously. I personally think it would make the world better if Peterson and all his followers were raped and murdered on live tv so we have examples of how not to be.

Everything is pretend on a long enough time scale. He knows what he's talking about. I've watched every recorded clip of Hitch and Dawkins and Peterson is not another confused evangelist. His argument is that the "truth" of the Bible predates the scientific method by a few thousand years and the truth it is conveys cannot be understood in the same way a scientific truth is.

The universe is analog, not digital, and cannot be reduced to an IF...THEN statement. Shit is complicated, and his argument runs perpendicular to both evangelism and atheism.

Thank you for providing an actual answer. I accept your position and appreciate you not acting like a child like other morons who have replied

if you take peterson seriously you’re the child retard. kill yourself leech faggot

Sort yourself out.

Simpe

He sounds like kermit the frog and it annoys me

I have an MA in philosophy and know more than you and I can say verifiably peterson followers deserve the death penalty.

Why isn't he able to accept someone's pronouns because gender is binary but when asked on whether or not he believes in God he won't answer because he feels boxed in to giving a binary answer?

Hasn't the constant downfall of religion proven him right. Considering the degeneracy and disgustingness of western society over the las 70 years? And, no, I'm not religious.

I'm a NAVY SEAL with 47 confirmed KIAs etc. etc.

Okay well then your opinion is effectively worthless for this discussion.
Do is all a favor and don't reply anymore.

Wrong.

Which is exactly my view of Petersons opinions

Gender is not complicated.

God is, and he gives a very eloquent answer. Your inability to comprehend the nuance of what he's saying doesn't mean he isn't saying it, it means a freshman has wandered into the wrong classroom.

Anyone who joins the navy or military also deserves the death penalty.

Keyboard warrior.

Attached: 7a9.jpg (600x480, 57K)

Hey faggot. Look up stephen hicks book explaining postmodernism. Peterson lifts his whole shtick from hicks who’s a fucking follower of Ayn Rand and is a laughing stock in academic philosophy. He knows nothing about postmodernism or marxism and I reiterate, should be raped and murdered on live tv.

>without religion
Well this isn't exactly what he's said though. His arguments on religion revolve arround meaning and how religion can provide it. But he does put forward more ways to find meaning outside of religion. E.G. adopting responsability.

He makes this argument, then draws a parallel to jesus carrying the cross.
This isn't an argument from religion, but one for meaning and then a statement validating certain religious ideas from the first argument, by showing how religion has served to help people find meaning.

The important part for him isn't that you are religious, but that you understand the meaning behind religions in general.

He doesn't just speak about christianity, he also references taoism and buddhism a lot.

There's meaning behind stories we've told each other for thousands of years, otherwise we wouldn't have bothered.

>Gender is not complicated.
Neither is giving an answer on whether of not you believe in God. Try again.

He's never even claimed to be a Christian nor has he in any way promoted Jesus as the messiah. He refuses to answer questions regarding god and religion - that's not what his message is about. It's about assuming responsibility for yourself as an individual and eschewing identitarianism.

>and there need to be more of him in the world
does it really? I, for one, would appreciate if he stopped jumping out of my fridge (that doesn't even have wifi)

literally my every other suggested video on youtube is him
like, fuck off, dude, it's been over a year now since I last watched any of your crap

> He believes that without religion society will become full of nihilistic suicidal babies.

Friedrich Nietzsche thought the exact same thing, yet:
1. We're all still here.
2. All of the nasty shit that goes on in the world.. the kind of shit that just makes rational people want to quit life.. is STILL mostly caused by all of the irrational religious nutters.

Without religion, and the irrational notions of the existance of deities, Human existance would be close to Utopia. Jordan Peterson, et. al., are all fallowing a philosophy of self-perpetuating doom, and because the core of their beliefs is irrational, they will only ever see the opposite.

Clearly wrong. You need to watch more of his lectures.

he never makes his position clear and just dances around questions

Sure, just keep ignoring my question, that'll make my problems with him vanish

I feel like your anger is the result of exposure to the judgment of the chaotic feminine and long-term abstinence.

He's stated he would call someone by their prefered pronouns if he knew them personally, and he often refers to people as he/she based on how they are presenting.

The only thing he's said about pronouns is that using them should not be compulsory by law, which it is now in Canada. It is very dangerous for a government to compel individuals to use certain language. That was his main argument. He has never said anything disparaging about trans people or being trans in general.

jp btfo

kek

That means youtube thinks you're interested in his videos. Meaning your viewing habits are very similar to people who do want to watch him.

Meaning if you hadn't some specific reason to not wanting to watch them, you would and a lot.

What is that reason, user?

That's not my question.

Learn to think for yourself instead of repeating your retarded little manlet creed. Just admit you wanna lick his asshole and go to bed kid.

Your question was answered. He accepts people's pronouns. Do you need help with reading comprehension?

You know why he needs

to type like this? With the

spaces in between? It's

room for his own farts he's

huffing. Sniff Sniff Sniff aaah

Perfect fucking short and sweet troll post.

If anyone doesn't get the problems; it's both an appeal to the audience and ad-hominem. None of his actual arguments were refuted. Just an attack on his character

Clearly you do if you think your logical fallacy is an answer to my question. You answered something I didn't ask.

Honestly, I didn't pay any attention to the guy until about a month and a half ago. I'm really critical of the far left, but I still maintain a center left-right stance on things.

I finally sat down and listened to the things he said on Joe Rogan and a couple of the more attack-based interviews and most of his lecture series he did on the pinnochio film. I honestly couldn't see what everyone was getting pissed about. There wasn't anything unreasonable being said. It actually took me a while to realize he was religious, and even when I did it was more from a stance of individual morality than anything else.

But because I watched all of that I started getting a bunch of right wing nutter videos and people freaking out about ghostbusters and captain marvel, which i couldn't really give a shit about. And they are getting as worked up about stupid shit as much as the identity politics leftists are. I'd prefer it if both sides would just shut the fuck up.

But as far as what he's saying, it all seems fairly measured and reasonable. I don't get what they're having a hard time with.

Peterson has never had an original, interesting or useful thought in his life and if you like him you should be castrated.

>Yea Forums is one person
LOL rekt

No it's not. You don't believe in things that there's no evidence for. Believing in god is as credible as reliving in Zeus, or unicorns, or zombies. It's all retarded make believe shit that only autists take seriously.

>the people in this thread
youtube.com/watch?v=4iFi4p4QC44

Go clean your rooms.

Not gonna listen to someone who only eats meat. Nutrient imbalance can seriously fuck up your thinking

theatlantic.com/health/archive/2018/08/the-peterson-family-meat-cleanse/567613/

Your question entirely misrepresents his argument in teh first place. Clearly he doesn't accept the hypothetical model of "non-binary" gender, as basically all scientists aside from misinformed post-modernist psychologists believe.

Because he doesn't accept this theory for reasons he's already explained, your question wouldn't apply to him. Prove your theory of gender being "non-binary" to be true and ask your question again. Or go away.

He dons't understand science, but thinks that he does.

>stupid shit
This is how you keep pushing insane liberal shit. By pretending replacing white with spics and blacks and pretending women are stronger than men. By not caring about the little cuts, you eventually bleed out. Be more weak. What you agree with about peterson is exactly why you disagree with "the right". And that's the slow creep of degeneracy and bullshit.

his daughter is extremely rapeable. that’s the only good thing jordan peterson has ever brought into the world is this pair of tits.

Attached: D381D7B5-7D19-442C-83A8-5490C1AF19AD.jpg (1125x1335, 445K)

Owes me money, lol.

Example? Where has he misrepresented science?

Dr. Jordan Peterson, the expert of Disney movies.

Nice post, dude. Almost as good as mine right here.

Because it's a bunch of new bullshit that came out of humanities courses by far left intersectional feminists who want us to think there's no genders or multiple genders or that gender isn't the same as sex etc etc basically ignoring what we've known for thousands of years because they want us to play pretend with them.

They can call themselves whatever they want. But the rest of the world is under zero obligation to do the same. However when you begin to do things like pass laws that get people fired or have people get arrested because they won't play along with your delusions (how many genders are there? if you ask most intersectionalists/trannies, you'll get as many answers as there are supposed genders - because it's all made up bullshit) - then it's time to reign in their bullshit.

Despite peoples beliefs to the contrary, your rights end don't end where their feelings begin.

Attached: tranny-arrest.jpg (1125x1529, 252K)

You're still arguing something that isn't my question. I don't know why you keep deflecting instead of just answering the question.

the humanities isn't a real degree.

mine was way better, especially the part about cutting of the balls of people who think peterson is smart

Calm down princess.
I don't actually know his position. I've listened to many lectures and interviews and have never come across this information. If you explain or link a video of him explaining in detail that position I'll gladly reply in an informed manner

LOL imagine being as retarded as you. There is over 100 years if modern science proving what they are doing is fine. And not to mention thousands of years of evolution.
Holy shit look at this:
foodstruct.com/compare/vegetable-vs-meat

I teach community college. What the fuck are you doing retard, besides jacking off and working at wendy’s?

pretty much this, person that believes in magic is not someone worth listening to

Again, not my question.

define try

and define again

Literally to fix this problem just call someone she if she wants she or he if he wants he and you won't get fired. I don't see how difficult this is.

If you see this video and still disagree with him, you need to commit suicide.
youtube.com/watch?v=qQdpoIfc6bg

There shouldn't be a market for his shit but autists don't know how to act so there's his market. hes a twitch thot

Racial Identity is the lowest form of collectivism. Fuck off back to your trailer, Jasper.

I want fuck her and make Jordan tickle my balls while I'm doing it.

Attached: 1ebf8f7dd449bf130bbf17c066efe35fb3133ee77f0d9b5cbe6e374ac210f24f.jpg (625x417, 82K)

And now you're just trolling because you have nothing. Forget it - take care.

Why does there need to be some particular reason? He's just boring. He already made his position on some key points very clear, and is now perpetuating the same crap over and over. Why would I wanna waste my time listening to that? May he keep D E S T R O Y I N G the shitty liberals in peace, and I'll humbly go my own way. They're two peas in a pod anyway.

Make an attempt at answering my question once more.

Oshit.

You're good then, bro.

That's what most people are doing and the majority of people have no problem with it. Jordan Peterson didn't have anything to say about this until Canada past laws compelling speech in the mater. That's the issue.

you learn more about philosophy reading by yourself and actually thinking about it than you do from some jacked up college pseudo-intellectual whose jaw needs checking. Do a real degree or shut up you neet

>if we are different in a positive way it's cool
>if we are different where you are worse it's bad
That is your brain.
>asians ALL OVER THE WORLD are smarter
HORRAYY ASIANS! They are so smart!
>blacks are less intelligent ALL OVER THE WORLD
HURRRR BIGGOTRY BLACKS ARE THE SAME AS EVERYONE ELSE!!!!!
>blacks are better athletes
YEAH, take that white boi, blacks have superior athletics!!!!
>whites work harder
HUURRRR NOOO!!! BLACKS AND WHITES ARE THE SAME!!!!!!
>BLACKS HAVE HUUUGGEEE COCKSS!!!!!
LOL YOU MAD WITE BOI!!!!????
This is your brain.

>I'm trolling because you can't answer a simple question
Just tell me why he can't answer a simple yes or no question when asked if he believes in God.
Actual JP quote: "It's an attempt to box me in a binary answer"

What the fuck do you think I do but make people read philosophy themselves. Are you retarded or severely confused about how schools work? I wouldn’t be surprised if your inbred parents never took you there.

Because it's the denial of reality. It's playing along with someone like a child. It's playing along with a delusion, the same as saying to a schizophrenic "the voices in your head are real. what's more, they should have voting rights because they have their own opinions".

Why should society at large be legally required to play along with a formerly small minority so they can play their game of Lets Pretend because they're unwilling to seek mental health treatment or want to exert passive aggressive control over others?

You don't see anything wrong with government mandated speech?

You know nothing about philosophy if you take Jordan Peterson seriously. He’s self help for sad scared little boys.

>youtube.com/watch?v=o9BbQyg7zwQ

>youtube.com/watch?v=fYUs0Y77yEs

>youtube.com/watch?v=K9ECd51btUw

took about 5 seconds to google

Watched and kek'd

can you strawman some more, did you seriously fall for bbc meme, christ

define Make
define an
define attempt
define at
define answering
define my
define question
define once
define more

we can't have an intelligent conversation if we're working with different definitions of the words that we're using, friend :^)

guy phrases nicely common sense and sells it to people, he has some good life advice but he doesn't preach anything groundbreaking.. sure he i opposing the fucked up cultural trends but he i working on his own agenda.... fightclub style... this is his recruiting phase, and he eventually wants to do something but fuck knows what exactly

Imagine contracting scurvy to rek the dems lmao

You are way too worked up about this.

Take a breather, Cletus.

Not really, no? I don't go out of my way to purposely fuck with people who just want to be called what makes them comfortable and happy.

so... you read sophie's world and paulo coelho, ok. that's not philosophy, user. sleep tight bucko.

Attached: 1300044776986.jpg (600x600, 35K)

LOL you don't know what straw man means. Racial identity is the end all be all of humans. That's how you live or die. The racial pie is infinitely sliced, you moron.

I mean, he's trying more than anyone on the board to get people to critically think about issues. Not sure why anyone would ask for real talk on a image board where the biggest alpha is the one that can ironic shit-post the hardest...

I don't think I ever heard him say that...

I wrote my thesis on Habermas, Spivak, and Gadamer. Please tell me one thing about any of them.

youtube.com/watch?v=qQeRu7BUEr8

lol

It's not that he can't - he won't. He doesn't want specific religious or theological beliefs to muddy his message. He does not believe his personal belief in god has anything to do with his message, and people knowing his personal beliefs will only use that information to confirm or deny what they already think about him.

Pretty smart, when you actually think about it. You should try it sometime.

You don't know if the universe is analog or digital faggot

I study machine learning post-grad, you know, an actually difficult academic field. I guarantee you less than 3 students a year in your class get through the Iliad alone, let alone sink their teeth into Kant or Goethe in any meaningful way.

Must feel good spewing low tier academia onto people who don't give a shit about learning

>an intentionally misrepresented proposition that is set up because it is easier to defeat than an opponent's real argument.

>if we are different in a positive way it's cool
>if we are different where you are worse it's bad
where did he claim that princess?

MRA dipshit

Said nothing about Peterson, try again

Anyway, I’m bored with this thread. Just wanna say again, if you take Jordan Peterson seriously, please kill yourselves. I would say don’t reproduce but I assume that won’t be an issue for y’all incels.

LOL STEM MAJOR FAG

What's your problem with him, again?

>he never makes his position clear and just dances around questions

If you know the problem, why even ask?

I work for a multibillion dollar corporation doing information security research that produces real, tangible results. You teach a bunch of kids and adults who just learned to read who didn't have the smarts to make it into a real university a bunch of nonsense that will never amount to anything in their life except to spew to co-eds at a party to sound smart in the vain hope that they're gullible enough to sleep with them.

Philosophy. The humanities D Student.

Imagine being literally as dumb as you
>30-180 mg of vitamin C recommended
>foods-high-in.net/foods-high-in-vitamin-c/beef-pork-lamb-and-meat,6.html
Whats it like getting rekt over and over again?

get a job lose weight date women

found the dude insecure about not contributing anything meaningful to the world

And you don't think that this power will expand and be abused? The same way Trump's trying to abuse his power by declaring a nation emergency at the border to get his wall built? You don't think the government will ever compel you to speak in ways you think are wrong?

Well played.

I know more about deconstruction, phenomenology and hermeneutics than you ever will bud. Now please do everyone a favor and just slit your throat

Nothing. Just an MRA retard.

I love how Jordan Peterson cries so often because he thinks he's soooo special for helping autistic MAGAts who will throw tons of money at anyone who says anything conservative.

Jordanetics: A Journey Into the Mind of Humanity's Greatest Thinker

Jordan Peterson also happens to be a narcissist, a charlatan, and an intellectual con man who doesn’t even bother to learn the subjects upon which he lectures. He is a defender of free speech who silences other speakers, a fearless free-thinker who never hesitates to run away from debates, difficult questions, and controversial issues, a philosopher who rejects the conventional definition of truth, and a learned professor who has failed to read most of the great classics of the Western canon. He is, in short, a shameless and unrepentant fraud who lacks even a modicum of intellectual integrity.

Attached: poster-492545.jpg (313x500, 30K)

found the dude with a mentally retarded idea of what it means to contribute.

found an American, where meaningful education is an insult...

You got anything of substance to say or are you just throwing your maggot around?

By claiming racial identity is the lowest form of collectivism. You fucking mong. Racism is the real truth. Because it matters. It's literally why homogeneous cultures are the safest.

STEM majors also deserve the death penalty. They’re useless.

Meant to say, unless you're a low IQ nigger with a DNA is closer to animals than any other human.

I accept the default movement towards gender equality, not this dipshit's crap.

He's not, thought. He regularly espouses having strong relationships. He has never advocated anything that harms women and elevates men above them.

you're bullied, aren't you.

jordan peterson after seeing a lobster: this is natural and how all humans should act forever. we are not smarter or more morally capable than a lobster

>Literally to fix this problem is to do as you are told, and not question our ludicrous beliefs that we are quite literally forcing on society.

Nothing to say, huh? Unsurprising.

Then why isn't he liberal?

now that depends what you mean by equality doesn't it

>this is natural and how all humans should act forever
Strawman, and a pathetic one at that. Peterson regularly points out naturalistic fallacies such as the one you're misrepresenting him of having. Sad.

Construct a venture expressing response belonging to one further.
That doesn't explain why he feels "boxed in" giving an answer.
You seem pretty impatient with someone who admitted defeat once already.

technically anyone who supports capitalism is a liberal in the scheme of national politics

Yeah, what did they ever do for anyone says the guy using a terminal connected to the largest store of human knowledge that ever existed

Those guys are fuckin' nerds.

hahaha
No, no it's not, take your pseudoscience and shove it up your ass. I have no intention in arguing with psudoscience spewing mongrel like yourself. Your ways are numbered globalism is here to stay and humans will mix ad infinitum. Then we'll find other reasons to slaughter our brothers and sisters. More meaningful reasons.
Eat shit, I'm going to sleep

Not really. Google "Equal Rights Amendment." I represent basically what you rage against impotently, but there's no fucking way you're going to stop us. :^)

First two - nobody cares, it's not the 80's.
>Gadamer
Regarding how unrelated he is to the others I guess there was a chapter on Eddie Murphy and Bolognese sauce as well. A true Hegelian absolute system.

Not really. Liberals advocate living wages and strong social programs as damage control basically because the far right wants this system in place.

>Jordan Peterson also happens to be a narcissist, a charlatan, and an intellectual con man who doesn’t even bother to learn the subjects upon which he lectures. He is a defender of free speech who silences other speakers, a fearless free-thinker who never hesitates to run away from debates, difficult questions, and controversial issues, a philosopher who rejects the conventional definition of truth, and a learned professor who has failed to read most of the great classics of the Western canon. He is, in short, a shameless and unrepentant fraud who lacks even a modicum of intellectual integrity.

This sums him up pretty accurately.

Because there's problems with pure liberalism that make it untenable.
He's a centrist more than anything, although he doesn't claim a political stance - that's his entire point - to think for yourself and avoid identity politics.

>too stupid to understand his argument
Got it. His definition of belief in God is "to act as if he exists"

I didn't state any beliefs on that position of any kind, I've only commented on some dude having a fit about being a community college philosophy professor

ohhh u found a logikal kontradiction... good stem major. let me know when you evolve past the level of thinking an 8th grade reddit user is at.

Absolute faggot you are. It's not nutritionally viable to try and live on only meat and water. If he were on the paeleo diet then, albeit still not terrific, he'd be better off than he is now. JP has said before in an interview that he got sick once when he tried to eat fruit again. Not fuckin healthy.

compared to actual leftists peterson is a liberal

Obama believes in God.

throwing insults around isn't an argument, you're shitting on STEM despite the fact that a huge portion of the things you take for granted wouldn't be here without those people.

Make a legitimate argument against the field and I'll take you seriously

>That doesn't explain why he feels "boxed in" giving an answer.

Probably because reporters and interviewers are constantly trying to... I don't know... box him in to an answer?

You are patently retarded. All your questions have been answered. You know they have. You have nothing else in rebuttal. That's why you're just trolling. Sad.

>centrist
which really means right wing

I'd rather have a left leaning perspective on women and relationships, user. I don't want this stuffy fuck giving me advice. Maybe it works for you.

says the guy making an 8th graders argument. don't forget to fuck around on your phone for 8 hours and roll your eyes at everything, sighing wearily.

Which means he's really just a conservative.
I don't care for right wingers, user.
I like Bernie Sanders/Elizabeth Warren/AOC social values.

Why would I argue with a stem major. They never learned critical thought

read the book he fantasied about fucking his cousin wrote about it in his first book hes fucked in the head

amazon.com/Jordanetics-Journey-Humanitys-Greatest-Thinker-ebook/dp/B07JY9XV38

I just looked up the actual content of bill C-16, all it did was add "gender identity and expression" to the list of recognized groups with which advocating or promoting the genocide of is prohibited within the criminal code.

if you think you should be allowed to advocate and promote genocide then I think you might need some help.

itt a lot of people are salty that peterson points out things in themselves they can't admit. Learn to dismantle your ego Yea Forumsros

only the godhead is real

>left leaning perspective on women and relationships
starts with c rhymes with duck

nice work backing out of having to actually make a point. let's see what you do next, will it be an insult against me/stem, a petty excuse as to why you can't defend your position, or will you nut up and make a point instead of sitting there like an empty vessel

not who you're responding to, but thats absolute unmitigated horseshit.

just because people aren't falling all over themselves embracing the "woke" lunacy and announcing their pronouns and saying they're able to see both sides of some arguments doesn't mean they're right wing.

To the radical left, centrists are right wingers. To the neocon trumptards, centrists are a bunch of hippy dippy lefties.

ok frogposter

You don't even have a clue what his perspective is. You've heard a few of your friends bitch about what they misunderstand about him and you do no further research. And what is a "left leaning" perspective on women and relationships? You think Peterson is advocating for them to stay at home and cook and clean? Fuck off - you don't even know what you're complaining about. You're calling a centrist a "right winger," which shows that you see the world through the veil of identity politics - which is exactly what Peterson warns against.

And I'm as left as you can get without being a drooling fuckign idiot.

Best argument I've ever heard. This thread was done before it began. Hard seal of approval for this post.

Attached: 20190226_140421.jpg (719x578, 142K)

I never posted a frog, lurk moar

you’re just proving my point because you’re so obsessed with “facts and logic” and the debate me bro mentality that you’re blinded by it. i feel bad for you really

He claims that anyone doing a good deed, theist or atheist, is doing the good deed because of religion and god's influence on society. He's saying there cannot be any good in society without a god or that god causes all good in society, even in those who don't believe in god. It's a pretty piss-poor argument and makes absolutely no sense.

>centrists are right wingers
They kind of are, though. They seem to "get" some things, while mostly they just defend the political right with their "both sides" crap. They should be punched like nazis, honestly.

/thread

Anyone who believes a fairy tale is just too stupid to be taken seriously.

It's not even true, he's a literal atheist. Watch Sam Harris screech like a baboon when he defines belief and truth

>two logical fallacies in one post
So he's boxed in because he's boxed in? And your response is ad hominem because I ask about it? You don't seem to be a very enlightened or rational human being.
If he already knows he can't dissuade someone's mind by giving an answer one way or another, why would he be hesitant to answer like it would make a difference?

Try actually answering instead of dancing around the question.

you're saying a lot of things about me without knowing any of them to be true, maybe it's you who is blinded by your own assumptions

user, he's an MRA dipshit
that's why you're posting him here
because Yea Forums is a haven for incels

Once a frogposter always a frogposter

Cite where he said this.

Attached: you have to go back.png (224x224, 11K)

nah, you know one stem major you know them all. they aren’t really people.

that's some cracking critical thinking there user, way to go

Hurr dee durr blah dee blah.
Hope you enjoyed your evening. Hope this continued trolling after being shut down after your first post assuages that sting in your ego.

Quote statements from him that make him a MRA.

Is that what MRA retards do?

not necessarily. I support gay rights/marriage, but i think identity politics, especially with genders has become more of a status symbol than an actual movement because victimhood is a way to get power quickly.

Alternatively I find trump and almost all of his supporters to be fucking lunatics, but I think we do need to be fiscally more firm with china. I just wish it was being done by someone smarter than him.

many of his positions are correct but his arguments for them are insufficient, generally because he bases his positions on particular things (e.g. pronouns) on very general arguments that he's made prior (the concept of freedom or responsibility). This is to say, his positions are fine, but they don't cohere. He's more right by coincidence than by method.

>he gives up for the third time
I like that projection about your ego, but you still haven't answered my question.

>If he already knows he can't dissuade someone's mind by giving an answer one way or another, why would he be hesitant to answer like it would make a difference?

Because the answer would would muddy his message, as it's not important. He doesn't want his beliefs turning anyone off from hearing his message. That's why he keeps it private. This was already answered.

I used to like him till he went full retard and started denying global warming. Now I can't trust a word he says.

>I can't refute the actual numbers
>so I'll just parrot dumb shit I am not an expert in

>identity politics
which is actually a term the far right uses to demonize human rights issues

i’m just trying to make my point in a way that even a retard like jordan peterson could understand.

Yes.

citation needed

>started denying global warming
what did he say exactly?

The problem is that he is terrified to throw out the dumb/bad parts of religion because he is afraid to "throw out the baby with the bath water." This bath water is thousands of years old and there are no babies left in it.

lmao implying people don't care about habermas.
I bet you'd suck off papi rawls

bro you asked a retarded question and it was answered, lol fuck off

no, you're avoiding everything pressed against you and throwing around insults instead of having any meaningful conversation. congrats on wasting my time i guess

Too dumb to understand his points I see

this is the only good comment in this thread

that was the goal. go back to making drones that kill people or whatever thing you’ve convinced yourself isn’t a meaningless way to live your life

Not the user, but I gotta let you know that you're the one that needs to see his lectures. He speaks about theology and the stories that are contained within many religious texts as a means to learn about the human condition. He's only ever said that he lives as though a god exists because the morality that is found within the Christian religion in its modern form rules that are generally a good way to live life by.

Well, i'm a center-left and it is identity politics. it's the most center name i can come up with it. Leftists tend to just call it "human rights" but me not agreeing to call a genderlfuid by their ever-changing pronouns isn't a violation of human rights. It's simply not playing along with an exhausting person who wants everyone to walk on eggshells around them.

Glad you didn't give up after all.
If his answer is already muddied based off assumption, how would it hurt his "message" more if he answered a simple question? It makes him look more incompetent to dance around it saying he's "boxed in".
Kind of like how hypocritical it is for him to be an advocate of free speech, but dis-invite someone from a free speech event for having different opinions.
>bro you asked a retarded question
And you, as a retard, was unable to answer it.

I work on ML algorithms for medicine actually, diagnostic stuff. You should read into it, you might learn something

youtu.be/6T47opnLyFw

Attached: Screenshot_2019-02-26-22-39-24.png (1440x2560, 1.44M)

>u can survival off meat only ooga booga
>no don't attack daddy peterson for his poor health choices
>i live only by numbers that I had to go to obscure websites to find

that’s cool i worked on three ML algorithms for medicine this morning

>but me not agreeing to call a genderlfuid by their ever-changing pronouns
which frankly is a made-up controversy and nobody's getting you to do anything.
And if you say you've got links, then yeah you're full of shit. "Identity politics" is a good thing.

Hermeneutics as a good thing to boast about I SHIGGYDIGGY

better than whatever analytics pass as “philosophy”

No u

>Militant atheism
>intellectually sound

Attached: 1535491409491.jpg (676x750, 115K)

Attached: 1526260019223.png (2160x950, 340K)

No
Nice argument.

People were doing it well before him. You're just dumb.

>If his answer is already muddied based off assumption, how would it hurt his "message" more if he answered a simple question?

His answer? You mean his message? I already this.

Look, I know it's tough when you're sitting at home and you work up a question that you totally believe somehow puts a hole in an academics credibility. You type it all up, feeling confident, and it gets annihilated as the stupid, baseles, meaningless question it is. Because, let's face it, even if it was a valid question, what would it matter? Why nitpick this one specific issue so much? Because you have an agenda. You argue from emotion and refuse to see logic, and when your facade is exposed, you end every post with:

but you still haven't answered my question.

So allow me to pose a question: why do you think it's so important for you to believe that Peterson is somehow incompetent or not to be listened to because he refuses to answer a "binary" question, when at the same time criticizing him for not seeing gender as non-binary?

I already answered this*

And guess what: People lived drastically shorter lives. In the end, IDGAF what he wants to do. I'll gladly keep my balance of meats, fruits, vegetables, and all different kinds of foods that I can eat. Peterson will just have to prove he won't fuckin die.

The people who have lived longest since modern medicine keeping people barely alive..........??? Want me to rek you again??

Agnostic here. It's stupid to be certain that there's no god. Don't conflate Christianity with every belief in god.

Really? Try calling someone "dude" when they identify as a female, despite clearly being a male.

Try getting arrested for "misgendering" or "deadnaming". Or losing your job.

I absolutely support anyones right to call themselves whatever they want. But I should have no obligation at all to play along with them.

>you're full of shit
So I provide news stories of it and you're preemptively dismissing it. That's about on par with my own personal experiences with the far left. The same group that is calling a civil rights pioneer like martina navratilova "Transphobic" because she refuses to disregard basic science that doesn't align with progressive far-left narrative. Or calling feminists "old" and right-wing because they don't consider people with dicks to be women.

WASH YOUR PENIS

Why instead of answering my question did you type that mini sperg-out in the middle attacking me? Can you not help yourself but ad hominem? How, as an intellectual, can you answer a question with a question?
But I'll humor you. I don't think and internet argument on Yea Forums is important. You keep assuming my stance on JP because I'm willing to ask questions about him, while I'm just curious as to why you think he's infallible because he's unable to answer a question with a "yes" or "no".
It says a lot about you intellectually when you're not only unable to answer my questions but consistently cherry pick my questions to suit your narrative.

discord
=======
.gg/tFpyete

>I don't think and internet argument on Yea Forums is important.
So you fuck around with semantics and troll - I already knew this but I thought maybe you were someone worth having a serious conversation with. Figures.

And you still haven't answered my question.

>I'm just curious as to why you think he's infallible

Look who's assuming stances now ;)

No. I was just asking my questions seriously, you just couldn't answer them. I have answered your question, you're just a spiteful contrarian.
No need to samefag. It's clear what your stance is on JP based off your unwillingness to answer anything that would "hurt his message", to put it into your words.

He's not any smarter than the average joe. that's about it. He makes arguments about how human society should be conducted and justifies it by pointing to serotonin in lobster brains. The comparison makes no fucking sense, but since he doesn't debate competent people usually, he gets away with it. His debate against atheist Matt Dillahunty left him completely wrecked.

it's about more than just genocide, it guarantees them as a protected class that cannot be discriminated against in any way

which seems ok at first, until you have trannies abusing the law in all sorts of strange ways

kiwifarms.net/threads/jonathan-yaniv-jessica-yaniv-trustednerd-trustednerd-com-jy-knows-it-jy-british-columbia.49790/

skim that page for a quick rundown on how much trouble a single trans troll can cause when they've got the law on their side

as hilarious as it is that a tranny is trying to force (with the power of a human rights tribunal) women to shave his nutsack, there is something seriously wrong with him being able to bully people like that

You obviously did not watch that debate and settled for a heavily edited and cherry picked video about the video where some other autist who is too dumb to understand his arguments "explains" what happened in the debate and how Dillahunty "won" the debate.
Explain why you think Dillahunty won, you NPC.

I guess they gave up again.

Who cares if people critique him? Can't you just like someone on your own wo caring what other people say?

Attached: 1550374075939m.jpg (1024x1024, 94K)

Attached: 1534236244361.jpg (369x496, 27K)

Attached: tranny-meltdown-meme.jpg (770x1226, 242K)

Attached: tranny-meltdown-munter.jpg (640x955, 176K)

he says a bunch of words and i am not smart enough to follow

Sure you can, but that is not interesting. Ideas need to be hashed out vigorously to determine their validity. His critics resort to slanderous misrepresentation and do not actually address his arguments.

Who is he?

The vast majority of his supporters are too stupid to criticize anything.

He is trying to get people, men in particular, to rediscover the good qualities about themselves, and how they can use these qualities to better themselves and their society, and indeed the world. I don't hink he actually belives in God, but he knows that admitting he is an atheist would severely damage his mission. He sees the virtue in using religion to get people to be good, even though he may not be religious himself.

Blindly following someone makes u a retard

discord
===========
.gg/hkREPYB

FUCK CANADA

Cool, I should blindly follow your unarticulated opinion then, right?
Fuck off until you have something substantive to say.

Heyy...nice Elon...!

Attached: 1fzie6r6hrai9ofmq228631007300.jpg (1508x1154, 166K)

because some things are binary and other things are not

"Actually girls like small penises"
Jordan Peterson

lol #rekt

How awesome would it be if Hitchens was still alive and had a conversation with Peterson

Attached: Christopher_Hitchens_2008-04-24_001.jpg (1045x1338, 362K)

His fans are winy cunts.

They understand his arguments and know them to be true. They hate him because they hate the truth.

His enemies and their fans are far worse

youtu.be/Gy5j-Sm4Ur8

Most of what he says is a jumbled mess with very little solid evidence behind it. He bases his psychology off Jungian archetypes for fucks sake, Jung being someone who has been completely discredited at this point.

Just look at this fucking mess of a diagram, it's like a conspiracy theorist just went completely off the rails, it's gibberish.

Attached: peterson5.jpg (1374x1067, 195K)

>no strawman
>What-aboutism accepted

Your opinion of his opinions are not based on the validity of his opinions, but instead on his view of an unrelated subject. Objectively, your opinions don't matter in this discussion, while the discussion is necessarily related to his views (outside of religious belief or anything else unrelated to his arguments, because that's not what is being discussed).

A book written by Theo who actually shared a lot of the same views on religion, immigration, gender and more but was also a science fiction writer and struggling game developer.

Hardly a coffin nail. Just another guy with an opinion.

>nearly half of all trannies kill themselves

If there any work going in 200BC Greece we'll let ya know.

He strawmans socialism a lot and has repeatedly backed out of debates with prominent Marxist thinkers. I like a lot of what JP says and stands for, but he’s made enemies out of reasonable people by essentially trying to turn their movements or ideologies into a scary existential thread, possibly not realizing that sensationalist scapegoating is what’s in now and is contributing to his success

You asked a two part question, faggot

Attached: gipj024y25y11.jpg (638x1000, 92K)

>community college

retard
might as well just admit you like getting fisted up the ass, it gives the same amount of bragging rights

Attached: 1525908418282.png (645x729, 90K)

>Jordon Peterson
>doesn't use misrepresentation of his position
Please tell me you're joking.
Jordon B Peterson uses misrepresentation every damn time to trick his opponents into painting him as a villain -- just so he can better defend his position. He's an underhanded snake.

Look at the whole 'forced monogamy' thing. Jordon was in that whole mess because he chose a controversial sounding name for something that was actually reasonable and bland.

Guess what, when the reporters attacked his position, he pulled the rug on them. That's just an insubstantial way to win an argument. Nobody is going to take you seriously when you pull back and say "N-No guys, I really meant this" all the time.

Attached: kermit suicide.jpg (457x449, 23K)