>It also makes the child more violent overall and more prone to anger.
Funny how this is demonstrated by that one guy in this thread LOLE
I wore something stupid today and everyone kept calling me a faggot and i want to cry about it but i’m not allowed to...
what's really funny is how the one angry guy happened to be the only guy with any sense...
copy pasta
What I meant by that is that teaching a kid not to cry doesnt resolve the issue, he will still feel the need to cry, but he won't since you told him not to. I understand that I didn't convey the message correctly. My fault. I stand corrected, you could make a child not cry by telling him/her not to, but it will not advisable to do so.
I don't think you should ever twists your son's balls, it might damage them and make him infertile. Of course I know it's a metaphor for simply beating your child. As I said in a previous post, it is not really effective in correcting behavior. Punishment usually is a weak form of behaviro corection, it might stop temporarily, but it is not long lasting.
Why do you think most dogs are taught via treats and petting? Because simply beating them is not effective for long lasting behavior and has the side effect of making the dog prone to violence and anger.
Punishment is alright if you want the child to stop the behavior immediately, but do realize this can increase violent behabior in the future and that it will not teach them about correcting their behavior. Why not just explaint to the child why their behavior is wrong? If they can't understand with clear direct language then they can't understand with corporal punishment.
t. angry guy
but what about the drug addiction user?
I notice all the errors in writing this.
I should proof read more often.
It might stop the behavior temporarily*
Not effective for long lasting behavior correction*
Lots of typos
I should go to sleep
leet
good night i love you