NTA, but if you crit first, the next one doesn't have to be a crit, but it still can be. If you don't crit first the next one has to be a crit.
You should be able to solve this
Christopher Myers
Luke Price
Fucking retard. Dumb shit fucking stupid nigger.
Jason Long
25%, 33.3%, or 50% depending on how you interpret the question, which is vague with poorly defined parameters requiring at least one assumption that is not outright stated in order to be justified.
Austin Miller
>the next one has to be a crit
then only one of the hits will be a crit, you need both
Easton Martin
>which is vague with poorly defined parameters
No it isn't you retarded ESL.
Blake Green
it does, the order changes the outcome to one of three possibilities (33%)
crit > no crit
no crit > crit
crit > crit
Thomas Miller
I forgot stats but I think the format of the question if written out is
P(X=2|X>_1), p(x=.5)
Angel Jones
50% because the question then just becomes you have a 50% chance to crit, what are the odds you will crit?
Nathan Long
Yeah it's time to replay my wife Lissa's game
Jacob Morris
You have a legitimate learning disability. You are one chromose short of being a monkey.