Link's Awakening: Remake

>"game is only 4 hours long!"
>"game shouldn't be $60 + tax + tip!"
>"game is a soulless remake!"
>"Nintendo is scamming you on nostalgia!"

Already the 4th best rated game in 2019. And it hasn't even been a full day since release. Everyone loves it from critics to fans.

Stay humble, Zeldabros.

Attached: stream.png (970x320, 85K)

Other urls found in this thread:

howlongtobeat.com/game.php?id=10032
youtu.be/oiA-1zj7ZOU?t=745
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

soulless cashgrab through and through

It's worth it, fuck you all.

some are really beyond help

>Soulless
Well memed
>Company's goal is to make money
>Makes money
Tonight's forecast: dark

>Pirates game on hacked Switch
I don't see a problem here, Support what you like.

>4 hours long
It's at least 10 though, and that's not even impressive. There's no need to play up it's short length when it's short as fuck already.

To be fair it shouldn't be full price. That's the one thing that's keeping me from getting it.

Jokes on you we won't have darkness here for another couple of weeks

>Already the 4th best rated game in 2019
On the Switch. Learn the read retard

>Nintendo bonus doesn't exi....

I played Link's Awakening DX through Virtual Console on my 3ds last year and and the remake is so much worse. Fuck this game.

>"game is only 4 hours long!"
>"game shouldn't be $60 + tax + tip!"
>"game is a soulless remake!"
>"Nintendo is scamming you on nostalgia!"

All these statements are very true

Being a good game does not make it worth $60. I'm going to rent it personally.

Mate, GOTY belongs to the Switch.

Kayleigh literally sustains himself on kojima's cum, we all know who is going to win.

Modern Nintendo is literally Disney

SNOY ARMY ASSEMBLE
WE NEED TO WRITE 0 POINT REVIEWS BEGINNING T-90

Koijima doesn’t even understand what the hell he made.
It’ll probably make deadly premonition seem like it has a well thought out consistent storyline

Merit really doesn't matter here, Kayleigh will never allow his beloved master to lose.

>8.8
OH NO NO NO NO NO

But that's good.

I'm having fun so far, just got to the first dungeon. The framerate is absolutely awful though, what gives? It randomly drops in places with no action and it's so jarring.

60 dollars is too much for any kind of game, but paying for how much hours of gameplay there is is retarded

>Everyone loves it from critics to fans.
>Everyone is retarded besides me

It's the Switch. Why wouldn't you expect dropped frames?

It is a 12-15 hour game, going by the original, it is too expensive for what you get, it is a bog standard remake, all of these statements are true
And yet I am getting it anyway, because it genuinely looks more fun than anything else that has come out in the past few weeks, fuck critics buy what you like.

its pretty soulful but agreed that its a cashgrab

4 hours? I remember spending days and days struggling through this as a kid. Dont tell me, some speed runner who played the GameBoy version over and over for weeks before the remake release did it realy quick.

>4th best rated game in 2019
wew
Switch library must be pretty shit.

>4th best rated game in 2019
I dont see mention that only counts switch games user.

>short game
>"It's not worth 60 dollars"
>long game
>"Imagine buying games, hack your Switch you idiot"

Every time. And probably the exact same "people".

glitchless speedrun is less than 1 hour

8.8 IT HAPPENED AGAIN OH NO NO NO NO NO

I don't know, 68 is a decent score if you cut the Nintendo and Zelda bonus

It's too bad most of the current Yea Forums posters were wearing diapers when 8.8 happened. Some of them were actually babies!

>Zelda game with a

>He doesn't know

>game is 4 hours
i swear to god it seemed waaay longer when i played the original
granted, some of my playtime was me trying to make sense of the 6th dungeon but still

also, i can't believe that solution to get one of the metal balls on the other side of a chasm to destroy a pillar was the intended way to go about it

>it seemed waaay longer when i played the original

Might have to do with you being a kid. I spent my 1 week winter breaks playing video games, and it feels like I've spent an entire summer (3 months) playing video games.

This. No lie has been told.
>b-b-but all the critics love it
This is an industry where deviation from the status quo will get you fired from whatever publication you're attached to.
Anybody who is rational will also accept that you should deduct at least 10 points from that when you take into account the Zelda and Nintendo bonus.

>#4th best switch game of 2019
Blind nigger.

Literally every real fan of the game says the original is superior. Game journalists aren't true critics and normies who played the game once as a kid aren't true fans.

Imagine paying 60$ for a worse version of a free game.

>user score is higher than critic score
>"m-muh nintendo bonus... it's a conspiracy..."
lmao

>user score used as an argument in literally anyway
>90% of user reviews on metacritc are either 10/10 best game ever or 0/10 worse than cancer
It's almost as if you've never visited Metacritc outside of le hilarious screenshots.

Does it have the red and blue tunics though?

Is there actually anything new that makes it worthwhile? Finished the original twice and love it but I'm not gonna pay 60$ for a reskin.

It's on a new console, so that's new

>game is only 4 hours long
Bullshit
It's only 4 hours long if you're a spreedrunning loser skipping 90% of the content and even then it's bullshit

>8.8
oh boy

Attached: 1319855517701.png (1258x598, 82K)

It's worth getting if you either never played the original or cant go back the gb graphics.
Otherwise, get it but absolutely not at full price.
Buy its Zelda so let's face it, it could be double the price and the score would be the same and it would sell as well.

I dont think you know what soul means.

It's the opposite of a completely generic and meaningless shitpost on Yea Forums

>remake of old game drops you straight into the action with no infantilizing tutorials

Really refreshing honestly. Wish they'd do like HW and give you playable Marin tho

i dont think you know what soul-less means

>no infantilizing tutorials


uhh

Um... Cool I guess???
It's an obvious ploy to capture nostalgia
the art style is too simplistic,
and the story is the same tired old bland zelda story.
So i'm not gonna buy it, and there's nothing you can do to make me

Attached: Stroheim.gif (500x281, 998K)

They're motioning to legalize gay marriage?

It doesn't make snoyboys cry as much as Astral Chain so it loses points.

Cashgrab, albeit a well made one

Amazing they put so much effort into the 3D graphics of the game, yet the anime opening/endings are 2FPS animated on the mega cheap

Seems odd,

2-3 are true
The games over 4 hours, its not long but its not that short

Nintendo's SELLING nostalgia, it's not really a scam, most people know what their buying.

Are the color tunics still in? If they are, can they still be gotten really early?

>Yea Forums wants this game to fail so badly because they care about "the industry" but none of them are working on a game of their own

Just the absolute most childish entitlement

>13 years ago

Jesus

>Crash and Spyro remake trilogies
>Three games each, all of them longer than LA
>$40
I loved this game when I was a kid, but it just doesn't feel like $60 is right.

Where the fuck is this "4 hours long" shit coming from.

I played Link's Awakening DX back in the day and that game took me somewhere from 15-25 hours.

If it's a speedrun then fuck off, some dude can glitch to the end of Link to the Past in like 60 seconds.

Don't forget the latest digitalfoundry nintendo shill piece
>be a technical focused outlet
>list a bunch of glaring technical problems in game
>conclude that it doesn't matter because aww nostalgia cuddles and declare it 'unmissable' anyway

-M-M-MUH NINTENDO BONUS
You’ll be okay user.

Attached: 884E88D7-2E43-4433-BD4B-1106B6239BEA.png (662x602, 299K)

Links Awakening is objectively a good game, reviews aren't based around price point.
We're allowed to have standards for what we are willing to pay/expect for a certain price, especially if it's a 1:1 remake of a game that was originally 30-4 dollars, regardless of how good the game is.

It took you 15-20 hours because you were 9 and didn't know where the fuck to go.

2D Zelda's shouldn't take an experienced Zelda player longer then 8 hours to beat, and that's being generous.

I can just play the better version of the game for free on emulator, big "no thanks" to this ugly 3d trash

LA is better than those games at least

Guess this is lying, then.
howlongtobeat.com/game.php?id=10032

Guess so

Just got the European limited edition.
This has to be the cheapest LE I ever held in my hands. Hands down.
They couldn't even afford stronger cardboard, it's the cheap and soft one, bends like crazy. The box is also ridiculously small.

Remorse purchase, luckily I'm in Europe so amazon can suck it and I'm sending it back tomorrow. Or a resell if the price inflates.

How many lost sales will this see?

200k? 500k?

It's like 15 hours long on game boy, why do people think remake is 4 hours

It should be common knowledge you can beat any game faster on a subsequent run. You can beat the RE2 remake in an hour.

This complaint doesn't hold any more water just because people are replaying a game they already know when it's a known remake.

>It's like 15 hours long on game boy

Because you played that as a kid. Now that you're an adult, you're less shit at games. Also, you have more than 2 buttons on your Switch than on your Game Boy. You also have more hearts. You can also move in 360 degrees rather than just the 4 cardinal directions. Everything about the Switch version is much more efficient and easier. 4 hours is an exaggeration, but it's pretty much half of what it would take for you to beat the original game.

Also I bet most people who have played it haven't done so again for the last twenty years.
At that point it might as well be a new game again.

>Highly replayabel
>Throws you right into gameplay
>oozes with charm
>eliminates all of the menu shit from original
>no waiting like most 3D Zeldas
>But instead of any originality is a fucking remake

This would be the best Zelda game if it were original. For what reason other then nostagliabait did this game have to be another remake

Ratings for Zelda games mean literally nothing as boring games like skyward sword and twilight princess still reviewed well.

OOT and MM are the only good Zelda games.

Who here thinks Breath of the Wild and Link's Awakening should both be sold at $60 when BOTW has many, many, MANY times more content and interactive elements in it?

That website isn't a good barometer. You can use that website to take the "ballpark" measurement, but every game I beat, I can do it faster than people on that website. Guess I'm a "better" gamer than the average person.

>MM
>good

They're both overrated trash when it comes to Zelda games.

OLD GOOD NEW BAD

Attached: 1568209814591.png (644x800, 198K)

You will notice that I didnt say Zelda 1, 2, ALTTP or LA are good and they are older than OOT and MM.

By that logic Daggerfall should cost $5,000 though

botw zoomers are SEETHING that this classic has a better user score than their ubishit garbage.
time to face facts, zoom zooms: people want real zelda, not far cry with zelda characters modded in.

Attached: 33850C42-AC44-4614-A169-958904E2CC34.png (402x261, 233K)

And also. Mario 64 is the only good 3d mario game

As if game ratins mean anything other than "they paid us well for this", especially when it comes to Nintendo which is rated from 6 to 10 by default.
It's also no surprise that drones will buy literally anything, including cardboard and the exact same game they played 10+ years ago but with tech demo graphics same as FF7. Just watch as next year Nintendo remake Mario 64 with Odyssey graphics and engine and it gets rated perfect 10/10.

Attached: bright future.jpg (326x315, 30K)

It is only 4 hours long
It should be $20
It IS a soulless remake. They removed the photo sidequest and they replaced this soulful picture with the blandest shit ever
They are indeed scamming you with nostalgia

Daily reminder that DQ11s is coming next week. You faggots should buy that shit instead

>b-b-but DQ sucks because they have 20 year old mechanics
And the LA remake is a 1:1 remake of a 20 year old gameboy game

Attached: tumblr_o79i6o6hsd1rrftcdo1_500.png (500x474, 43K)

i uploaded links awakening gameboy to my SNES Classic and used the 60 bucks i saved on weed and chips and beer. I win!

I'm playing the switch version now and I'm actually finding it harder. Link controls so much more sluggishly than the original. They've also changed up some of the bosses so they're not as brainless. Still easy but not as laughably easy as they used to be

its easy because it is a game for 8 year olds

Don't have to remind me bro, fuck cashgrabs, my $60 are going straight into DQXI S and my dick will go straight into Martina.

Attached: 1546658480676.gif (813x665, 123K)

>They removed the photo sidequest and they replaced this soulful picture with the blandest shit ever
WTF, why? That's actively removing content, for a remake that's just stupid.

Fucking seething lmao

Must really infuriate you when those "kids games" keep topping every GOAT list ever published.

Attached: 1548002381606.gif (500x213, 499K)

Is this worth getting for someone who never played the original? Should I just wait for the price to drop, or just buy the original?

just play the original for free or buy it for 10 bucks if you absolutely want to
it's a short game with not much to do

Seething

Attached: 1568900434807m.jpg (1024x576, 86K)

>10 minutes into the digital foundry review
>not a single word about performance
Yeah, I'm thinking they were paid.

Great example of the Nintendo bonus. If this was a 60$ indie game without Zelda in the title it wouldn't have those reviews.

Or maybe its just a good fucking video game you seething shitter

>68 without nintendobonus

Digital foundry made their game doing technical analysis,pretty strange that they don't talk about the performance

Day 0 pirate do you buycucks even have access yet?

Name*

They finally got to it, after 16 minutes in a 21 minute video.

dude it says Zelda on the title and it has nostalgia bonus
you literally aren't legally allowed to talk bad about it
it's literal perfection now buy a copy for yourself and one for your friend you poor shitposter

Nintendo only produces soul

cope

>Nintendo only produces soul

Attached: 1568412938313.png (805x851, 89K)

havent you got a realistic third person action adventure/shooting game to be excited for?

there's like 4 or 5 coming out on the PS4 soon

Anyone know how to get the secret shell on Tal Tal where Pa (the guy who wants the pineapple) is?

I dug up the whole area, bombed a few spots, played both songs all over the places and I can't find anything.

all the guys and egirls who never played the original are going to cling onto this game and praise the hell out of it just so they can say they played link's awakening and get some game credibility (same as when oot for 3ds came out) even though it's just a souless rehash that can't even compare to the original

>four fucking hour game
>60 usd
nintentoddlers literally fucking eat anything.

It's ok not to like things, gramps. Now rest your hands for a bit before you get exhausted.

i thought we had moved past the "hour count as indicator of quality" bullshit?

ok but there is no excuse for the framedrops

The game isn't four hours, you retard.

Attached: 69F0E8F1-7F70-4BF9-8E72-0221A958ED3F.jpg (394x534, 61K)

>he can't beat an easy as fuck game in four hours
LOL

Are Nintentoddlers this fucking shit irl?

They're going to patch the fuck awful framepacing, memory leaks, and horrible blur, right?

No, retard. Another $60 well spent?

kill yourself

As someone who isn't a nostalgiafag, should I play the original first or just get this one?

do you want to waste $60?
just play the original

They're identical.

I swear to Christ I've never seen a game make the normalnigger infestation screech "sixty dollars" like this. No one gives a shit if you have to give that money to your cunt girlfriends, this is a video game board

>no secret boss or dungeons
>a fucking expensive soulless remake

Explain to me why people get upset about 0/10 user scores, but they are perfectly fine with 10/10 scores. I always found it very hypocritical how one of them is this huge issue, while the other one is just accepted.

Attached: 1555327861218.jpg (891x972, 231K)

>soulless
yeah ok pal

Why did they make the artstyle literal fisher price toys tier?

Because Nintendo

If you cannot justifiably explain your stance on a review score, you shouldn't be putting your opinion out there to begin with. I don't know where you've been looking that people are "perfectly fine" with giving any game a 10/10.

I knew Incineroar defenders were just s0nyggers mining for salt.

No you retard, it's acceptable everywhere. Just look at any fucking game you want and you'll always find some retards giving it 10/10.

>8.8
Oof

Dejar metacritic a mi

Attached: index.jpg (225x225, 10K)

>seething sonyfags
>seething poorfags
>seething zoomers
>seething TPfags
>you'll just hate it if they based it off the old art anyway
There. I think I've got all the big fanboy deflections.

DKC 1-3 used the same artstyle and are some of the most soulful games of all time. Meanwhile, Wind Waker uses cel shading and bobbleheads and is utterly soulless.

no they didn't, wind waker was great

Attached: file.png (800x640, 898K)

Bad of the game
>music is shit
>mechanics of the enemies are dumbed down.
>enemies dont look like previous enemies
>enemies has way less depth and ai and dont move like their old enemies.
>weapon doesn't push people far away when you kill them.
>enemies should be bigger and more threatening
>heart damage should be doubled because how much easier the game is.
>some aesthetics feel wrong.
Good
>good music
>the boss mechanics are changed but it's still good.
>good graphics.
>some aesthetics feel right
>level design to what I see is the old game but it has better graphics so this is a plus

>music is shit
>good music
Pick one.

The only valid criticism to me is the price. The art looks great, I love that toy look.

I like the caves music and some others in the game.

I dont like the one retro note then have an annoyingly loud wind section that is focused only on one part of the song not letting the other shine and feel out of place with the rest of the song.

I heard one song it sounded completely like farts as well and I think LA is one of the greatest soundtracks of all time.

I ALSO REMEMBER THERE ISN'T ANY MUSIC FOR THE INTRO SCENE.
Also the additions to the songs are retarded

NO! JIRENGAMER! YOU CAN'T KEEP DOING THIS!

Attached: linkle_shocked.png (410x550, 294K)

>4th best rated game in 2019
That's not really an accomplishment considering it's a Zelda game. To get an accurate rating of these games you need to remove the nintendo bonus

I am enjoying watching Yea Forums seethe over this

Question for Zeldachads though, is the THIEF mechanic the same? Do I have to steal to complete the picture book?

exactly what they turned Breath of the Wild into. Remember folks, we were supposed to be able to do all our menuing for food and map from the Wii U's second screen. The Switch has done nothing but suck.

Uber cringe, my dude. You sound like a mindless bleating sheep. No introspection or analyzation, you haven't even played the game, and look at you.

I still haven’t finished Dimitris route I should go back to that

Humble would mean being able to accept the flaws and criticisms of the game. This mindless blind support just enables developers and publishers to churn out crap.

still mad about your review bombing being stopped huh

Why would I waste my time and effort on something as fruitless as review bombing?

do you really think anyone in this thread giving the game shit have even played it

seems pretty soulful to me

youtu.be/oiA-1zj7ZOU?t=745

It looks like shit and they fucked up the Ballad of the Wind Fish.

Never played the original so I picked this up.

Pretty fun so far. Just finished the third dungeon, I think I'm around 3-4 hours in? I'm poking around every nook and cranny though. Playing minigames and such.

Where is this >1 hour shit coming from? Speedrunners? I'm assuming speedrunners

Is it 4 hours long for weird ass Nintendo autists that have played it for 20 years or is it just a really short game by design because it's a Gameboy game?

The game isn't 4 hours long, but it's not that much longer.

Attached: linkle_inquisitive.webm (480x700, 3M)

obviously

This is Nintendo. Nintendo is nothing but soul. Every frame is pure bliss.

Based Alaskabro

About 5

The original game is around 12-15 hours, give or take.

>Stay humble, Zeldabros
But Zeldafags are the opposite of humble. They go stir-crazy if they haven't shilled the latest game yet. This shit started with Breath of the Wild so I'm guessing it has something to do with that.

>Extremely simplistic artstyle that doesn't hold a candle to the original
>And yet the framerate is complete garbage despite being 30fps

I'm usually in favor of remakes but Nintendo keeps fucking them up stupendously. The only good thing going for this fucking half step of a remake is the music. That's fucking it. If this shit was ANY other game it would've been long forgotten.

sad that everyone hypes this shitty game, if LA is already so popular I don't even want to think about SWSH...

Can't wait for Yea Forums to shit itself when Nintendo announces further handheld Zelda remakes in this style.

Attached: https___blogs-images.forbes.com_davidthier_files_2019_02_Capture-21-1200x623[1].jpg (960x498, 78K)

Don't you have the one of the thousands of Bing Bing wahoos to look forward too? Or any of the other IP's Nintendo has been milking for the last 40 years

There is no picture book, but you can steal and be called THIEF afterwards.

Help Bros, I really want to play this fantastic remake on my Switch but I really want to spend time on Yea Forums laughing at all the haters who got BTFO.

Wat do?

Hardly 1:1 if they removed something you illiterate faggot.

>B-Bing Bing wahoo!

Meanwhile, in reality...

Attached: 1564789837781.png (758x930, 243K)

>Oracle Games remakes
Jesus imagine the HYPE

Attached: 1567635073266.jpg (700x800, 148K)

Were you trying to prove my point retard?

Scores on Nintendo games are meaningless, they are always biased as shit, none of these games would get above a 7/10 if they werent on nintendo platforms

>Mario Kart 8 deluxe, the same as the WiiU version with all the dlc plus improved graphics
>92
Cut it out of the screenshot as not to undermine yourself in future.

>Ah yes, let me throw as much money to Nintendo as possible like the shill I am!

Or maybe they are just better than your average Sony interactive movie

Nope it's just nostalgia and biased reviewers and we all know it. If the exact same games were on pc/ps4/xbox but they replaced the character nobody would even talk about any of these games.

Why are sonyfags always SEETHING when told they need to play a game to review it?

Snoyfags always say that because their games are wholly forgettable.
Nobody remembers hzd anymore.

What does your question have to do with mine? Why don't you ask them instead of me?

how long did it take for oot3d and mm3d to hit 20$

How can it be the same game if you replace the characters? Are you perhaps... mentally challenged? I'm sorry if that's the case and I would actually recommend playing this game as it is a lot more engaging than sitting through a Sony movie.

It's the answer to yours, my friend.
Just use your brain and you will see it.

I had forgotten how much of a dick the wind fish is. The fat fucking whale could at least give Link a ride to the mainland or fuck even some island at least. Nigga just saved your ass, don't leave him to die floating in the ocean

Attached: 20190603_002820.png (466x266, 158K)

>Stay humble, Zeldabros.
everyone and their mothers have been shitting on this game since it was announced, there have been barely any threads shilling it at all, even zelda fags doesn't like the art style, why the fuck are you implying we've been bragging about this?
honestly my only real issue with the game is how its capped to 30fps despite its simplistic art style, im still buying it anyway because i know LA has arguably the most complex dungeons in any zelda

No it's not, you imbecile. I highly, highly doubt that you rate every game you played as a 10/10. It would imply that every game you play is literally flawless and perfect.

I really hope nobody here wasted months of their life shitposting about this game only to get BTFO by Nintendo again.

That would be pretty embarrassing, wouldn't it?

Attached: Screenshot_2019-09-19-13-05-39-1.png (1080x1215, 94K)

The idiots who did the remake (gezzo) tied the framerate to memory allocation.

Do you have the game on an SD card? If so, move it over into internal storage. That should help.

nice buzzwords Reddit

meanwhile im gonna enjoy the remake

Fuck Yea Forums, I would be the happiest camper alive if this happens

>Anybody who is rational will also accept that you should deduct at least 10 points from that when you take into account the Zelda and Nintendo bonus.
I'll trust professional revews before I trust but hurt snoy neck beards on the internet

The beauty of the Switch is that you can do both. I'm playing Zeldy right now in handheld and laughing at the updates on my monitor.

Watching the seethe while playing makes the experience so much more delicious.

Attached: 1565469948089.gif (480x264, 489K)

It actually does answer your question, you're just too retarded to get some reading comprehension

Yea Forums can die in a ditch

i'd be the happiest motherfucker if I could get a remake of seasons

I’m just glad a new generation gets easy access to this game. Link’s Awakening was one hell of a game to have on the gameboy growing up.

>why does nobody care when fanboys give a game 10/10
>why is certain group of people angry
It literally doesn't. Maybe you need some reading comprehension since you apparently didn't even understand the question.

Zelda sucked and always will suck. No untalented hackjournos will change that. I will be patiently waiting until you forget about this shitty game and start hating on IGN again. Keep seething, you're helping me and yourself by not playing this shit and posting on Yea Forums instead.

>Why are people upset about 0/10 but are perfectly fine with 10/10
That was your question, and I gave you the answer.

It didn't answer the question. It was another question about something completely unrelated to my question actually.

Yikes. Nindie cringe. Game BTFO unbased.

Read it again, you will be able to tell with a little bit of thinking.

No one knows what it means its provocative

>don't call main character Link
I knew nintendo fans were retarded fucks but come on that was too easy.

This one isnt the bland same old zelda story though user theres no zelda no ganon and no triforce im waiting till black Friday at least to get on on sale i loved the dx version

>Sony boogey man
Never change nintendo kiddies

Attached: me.png (240x210, 9K)

>I want things to be bad and lazy on purpose for le epic salt xd
This style doesn't even fucking work for the Oracles, you stupid shitbag. The Oracles weren't dreams unlike LA.

Attached: 1565487152099.png (545x545, 537K)

Why are sonyfags so delusional they think we can't tell what ps3fan is?

>8.8
Zelda bros what happened?

Just like every other Zelda game it was massively overscored because of bias. In 2019 the game is a 4/10 and a boring one at that. But nintendies going to keep wearing those goggles.

Unbased. Zelda cringe. This game is yikes.

Okay, I will entertain your retardation. Explain to me how this
>Why are sonyfags always SEETHING when told they need to play a game to review it?
Explains why nobody seems to be upset that nier automata fans rate nier automata a 10/10, despite the game having obvious flaws.

>MUH Zelda inflated bonus

> only 8.8 Nintendo btfo

make up for fucking minds snoy niggs

Can’t wait for Sony to blow this console out of the water on Tuesday.

Not only did Nintendo steal exclusives to have them die on their awful console, they have the gall to put out low quality “remakes” that are censored and have content cut from the original game.

I can’t believe people eat this garbage up. But sports games make millions, too, so I guess I shouldn’t be surprised.

8.8 with both the Zelda and Nintendo bonuses means the game is trash.

>doesn't know that you can rename Link to something else in the game
Embarrassing.

at least Nintendo still has exclusives

ps4 will be the last Sony console I will ever own. Why? because it will have no games again besides movie games made by naughty dog

Oh boy. 90% of these comments are just rabidly defending this Chinese-made cash grab.

Who knew standards could fall to rock bottom?

>he can’t see 100+ million consoles sold
Oh boy, you’re the only one not playing one. Does everyone else hang out with you out of pity or concern?

No, you asked why people are more critical of 0/10 than 10/10.

And the reason is almost all 0/10 reviews obviously didn't play the game, and in the context of Nintendo games are simply SEETHING sonyfags crying.

10/10 reviews are definitely more likely to actually play the game, making them more valid by default.

Both of these are trivial to read out of my first point, if you learn how to read.

Did a Sony Pony just accuse someone else of censorship? LMAO

Could be worse. Could be like the Pokémon fanbase who now actively condemns people who criticize SwSh and labels criticism as a harassment movement.

Attached: thestateofpokefags.jpg (1080x1380, 198K)

So you have no quality, only trying to cry muh sales?

>story is same Zelda story
You literally haven’t played it

>be Nintendo
>censor game and sell it for $60 forever
>be Sony
>QC games to make sure we find them suitable and worthy of fans like me
>sell games at full price, have deals, and provide consumer-friendly business
That’s the difference

So what? its a and FIFA COD machine of course it will sell well in retarded countries like America

In Japan the switch is dominating

>Nintendo fans are so desperate that they mount online crusades to defend their awful games
Woo baby, talk about a crash.

When s-sony censores something its g-good s-shut up

They'll update it. They did with BotW.

>Japan is the world
I know you weeaboos can be delusional, but let’s not forget other countries exist too. And if you think this is a quantity over quality situation, Sony wouldn’t be selling if they had shoved trash in people’s faces, unlike Xbox and Nintendo.

ok, outside of all your stupid shittalking:

WAS THERE A DAY 1 PATCH TO FIX LAG?

>it's okay when Sony does it

lmao seething

someone hit me up with the link to the nsp

Attached: cooj.jpg (1840x1840, 402K)

You didn't respond to my argument, only COPED muh sales again.
Nice "quality"

>sell games at full price, have deals, and provide consumer-friendly business

because people stop giving a shit about snoy games after the first month its out so they mark them down to sell them

meanwhile, Nintendo games are still in demand even months after they came out

>60fps + dip

This game isn't worth the $60 for anyone who played the original game multiple times in the last 27 years.

It's fine if whoever never played the original game gives this game a high rating, but I don't think anyone who grew up with the original game should even bother giving this game a rating.

We will look into this.

OoA/OoS is next.

They’re still in, but you now need to get the Pegasus boots before the game lets you even enter the color dungeon

>price fixing means the game is in demand

>In Japan the switch is dominating

Switch has been dominating America the past two years as well.

I don’t see you responding to the fact that if good games sell well, the Nintendo would be almost equal to Sony. But they aren’t, so this means Nintendo produces bad games.

Does this game have the warp glitch?

If not, then it's trash.

Game reviewers recieve free copies, they don't care about consumer value.

>And the reason is almost all 0/10 reviews obviously didn't play the game
That is just your assumption and has no grounds in reality. If someone really hates a game that he plays he's likely to rate it 0/10.

>10/10 reviews are definitely more likely to actually play the game, making them more valid by default.
This point falls flat because yet again, you have no way of disconcerning if a person has played again, you are simply assuming they didn't.

Both, 0/10 and 10/10 scores are both mostly an indication that the person that gave them out is a fanboy. The only reason you should give a game a 0/10 is because it's literally unplayable, e.g. it crashes when you boot it up. There is no fucking reason to ever rate a game 10/10 when there's even a single thing that can be improved. Afterall a 10/10 means that it's perfect and no further improvements can be made.

>Game sells. Keep price.
>Game flops. Lower price to sell.

It's ok. You will understand supply and demand by the time you get into middle school.

And they said it was garbage. Guess the bribe didn’t come in.

Time aligned, Nintendo is doing better than Sony.
What is your COPE to that?

The real question is if this remake is good enough to justify not playing the GBA version over it, considering the $60 price.

Attached: 1567105082470.jpg (768x768, 158K)

I want some of your drugs

Do you actually believe ps3fan played the game?
You are just a SEETHING snoyfag mad your review bomb got deleted, good to know.
Because only sonyfags defend obvious retarded bullshit like that

Anyone know who animated the cutscenes? Because they look fantastic.

The credits theme is God tier as well.

I'll get it when it's on sale or when I have a little more money. It looks like what I would want from something like this, so I'm happy that it seems to have turned out well.

Attached: LtnPWRQ.jpg (715x600, 271K)

Are you a poorfag? No.
Do you have disposable income? Then yes.

>when it goes on sale
>1st party nintendo game
Enjoy getting it in 2025

>8.8
It's shit.

I actually know a guy that is scared Disney will buy Nintendo and justifies the exorbitant pricing of Nintendos mediocre crap as some sort of deterrence to keep the mouse from buying Nintendo.

Nintendo stopped producing soul the moment the DS stopped production. I played a lot of the Wii U exclusives and they just felt to me like uninspired retreads that have none of the magic and inventiveness of their older games.

>Do you actually believe ps3fan played the game?
I don't know what that is, but based on the context it's probably some other consolewarrior retard like you. Anecdotal evidence has no impact on anything I said.

>You are just a SEETHING snoyfag mad your review bomb got deleted, good to know.
No, I'm an idort. I'm not particularly fond of your poorfag fights, I'm currently playing doom 2016 with my RTX2080 and having a good time. I'm just here to point out the inconsistencies in your fanatical behaviour.

>Because only sonyfags defend obvious retarded bullshit like that
I'm not defending anything. I literally said that both 0/10 and 10/10 reviews are retarded. I'm pointing fingers at you for defending the 10/10 reviews though.

Attached: 20190920_202946.jpg (4032x2268, 2.15M)

I mean I was expecting more from a remake of a 20yo gba game that costs $60. Poor or rich there's something that feels wrong about this game.

>Afterall a 10/10 means that it's perfect and no further improvements can be made.

No it doesn't you fucking mongoloid shitter. Do you think 5/5 means absolutely 100% perfect too?

It just means that they like it, and that by extension, it's good. It's a provocation.

>A game with both the Zelda and Nintendo bonus gets a good score
Wow this is shocking.

Attached: 1402528244333.jpg (500x500, 143K)

If you didn't look at them, then why are you so sure it wasn't sonyfags SEETHING?
Because everybody who looked at the accounts can tell you that.

Of course you are defending them by saying it totally didn't happen.
Because you are the one claiming it has no basis in reality with confidence, so you are either defending them or have actual proof to the contrary.

>Do you think 5/5 means absolutely 100% perfect too?
Do you know how math works?

Yeah, It's almost like Nintendo are good at making video games or something.

you are a boring faggot who needs to stop posting

Review scores aren't maths you dumb fuck.

Or in November, lol

Because tendies never review bomb Sony games at all?

nope, it's just you being schizo

What's with the perpetual persecution complex Nintenye-arolds have that they feel the need to mindlessly defend ever single game the Switch gets? I don't remember it being like this before the Wii U came out. That failure obviously did a number on their sanity.

Would that not prove my point about why people take 0/10 reviews less serious than 10/10 reviews even more?

>If you didn't look at them, then why are you so sure it wasn't sonyfags SEETHING?
It's pretty obvious that you don't even read a full sentence of my posts. I don't fucking care what sony fanboys are doing, the point of my post was from the very beginning that you should treat people that are on the other end of the spectrum the exact same.

>Of course you are defending them by saying it totally didn't happen.
Yes, it didn't.
>Because you are the one claiming it has no basis in reality
You said that someone rating a game 0/10 is not an indication of whether they played a game or not.

What makes snoyfags so SEETHING about every single game the switch gets?

zelda fans are undeniably mentally ill. i'm so glad i got out of that cult with my sanity intact

>4 hours
>not short
Mate

Why would you?
That is completely retarded, people who actually played the game always have more merit than people who didn't.
Just a fact, retard.

And if you think somebody crying about Astral Chain when giving 0/10 to Fire Emblem, you are a special kind of retarded.

0/10 are almost never legitimate reviews, so they are considered less valuable.

Only a retarded cuck can't easily comprehend that.

>Why would you?
Because people that are overly forgiving are equally as worthless as people that are overly critical of something.
>And if you think somebody crying about Astral Chain when giving 0/10 to Fire Emblem, you are a special kind of retarded.
I don't understand why you constantly try this fucking fanboy angle on me when I've clearly proven to you that I'm already not part of your circlejerk. You are heavily biased towards nintendo from what you've put on display here so I can kinda see why you defend fanboys confirming your bias, but for me you are just as retarded as those sony fanboys you cry so much about.

I made a meta critic account just to slag on the game and I suggest all of you do as well. We can’t let the nincels continue to shill this trash to unsuspecting gamers that aren’t in the Nintendo cult.

bad drought, almost every game on their system is played better elsewhere and the ones that don't are hobbled by shitty base hardware despite spending the entire gen hyping snoy to be the best, it would make anyone tired.

Sounds like Nintendo too.

My point is that value is subjective. Not objective.

If you didn't play the game you review, you aren't critical you are retarded.

The fan boy angle is the reason why 0/10 reviews are never taken serious and often removed compared to 10/10 reviews, how retarded are you?

Get some basic reading comprehension, if 99 percent of 0/10 reviews demonstrably didn't play the game they are completely worthless.

More than any 10/10 could be.

and yet here you are crying in a nintendo thread

Attached: 1567713051720s.jpg (125x125, 4K)

See you in the next thread for a PS4 exclusive.

>underpowered
>gimmick
>supposedly a handheld but too large and performs better docked
>dock scratches screen
>cheap, flimsy joycons
>library consisting of rehashes, shovelware, the worst versions of multiplats and kiddie games.
>insufferable, delusional community
>manchildren love it
>system of choice for trannies and the morbidly obese.
>smash tournaments known for being comprised of people with no concept of personal hygiene
>an embarrassment to be seen playing in public
>horrible online, overpriced.
>console is overpriced, very low value in general
>often referred to as several derogatory names, some examples include “cucktendo shitch” or just “shitch”, “Fischer price tablet” or more rarely the “NINtENDO SWItCH” (the lowercase t’s representing the low testosterone of the typical Nintendo console owner)
I could go on but I think we’ve all seen enough to agree that owning a Nintendo Switch is undesirable.

>8.8
>8.8
>8.8

I'm not a loser like you ;)

Attached: 1566916298608.png (3840x2760, 850K)

what would possess someone to post something like this?

That's not a capcom game you retard

It unironically shouldn't be $60 and the performance issues seem like they'll be somewhat annoying but I'm still gonna get it. I'm a pretty big Zelda fan and links awakening is one of the few games I never played so getting to play a remastered version sounds fun. Besides, I already skipped out on astral chain and DxM so I need at least one game for this season

Better than BASED ITSUNO'S devil may cry

8.8

It's the forbidden review score

He's saying that if instead of Link you named him Blink nobody would give a shit and the game would score lower than that and he's correct.

There is some really mentally ill cult surrounding Nintendo games for some reason that in their minds makes every game developed a must have, which is kinda creepy

okay schizo

Or maybe their games are just great?

The fact you need to invent an elaborate conspiracy to COPE with reality is quite pathetic.

We all know all of the Nincels are merely pretending to cope with another trash fire.

It’s just pathetic.

...

Attached: 6b5 copy.png (1006x813, 73K)

if there's anyone who can't go back to gb graphics they're on total zoomer mode

>> folks

>Yea ForumsintendoGAF on full damage control again
Don't know why I even bother, it's embarassing trying to argue with you "people" sometimes

>*npc activates*
>criticism found
>upload image
>*npc powers down*

Don't really care about what score it gets or how well it sells. It's a complete pointless near-1:1 reskin of a game that didn't really need it. If they really wanted to remake an old 2D Zelda, it should have been Zelda 2. That game would have actually benefited from it.

>damage control for an 8.8

okay schizo

sort of like how you're hard wired to react negatively to every Nintendo product?

nobody "needs" a video game

I legit had to stop playing last night because the framepacing problem was giving me nausea. Also the 8 directional movement is so fucking shit and awkward to get used to.

>it's a Yea Forums defends yet another souless remake because it's from their favorite corp episode
I thought Nintendofags knew better.

Attached: 9R5iIud.jpg (1219x714, 95K)

>sonyfags are already SEETHING they have no games.

cope snoys

I've been playing it for a couple of hours, it's extremely faithful to the original and the art style really fits with the dreamlike tone of the game. Very solid remake imo

>RRWWWGGERRNNNGGGHHHHH
Sorry Chewy, did you say something?

Attached: solo.jpg (1000x563, 310K)

>Already the 4th best rated game in 2019

If you think that means anything, especially for a fucking Zelda game, you're a fucking moron.

Kek. Never seen this one before.

bought my copy before the shift bros can't wait to get home and begin

Attached: 20190920_213401.jpg (3264x1836, 1.65M)

FUCK YEA BROTHA! This game isn't even close to worth $90.

About 10.

You should have just burnt your money.

It's only HOW long?

it's amazing how Yea Forums will praise anything as long as it's made by nintendo

>Every frame is pure bliss.
That must explain the constant frame drops in this case

LA is genuinely a great game.

But in all honesty, the reviews for this game should be focused on the new content, the artstyle, music, and how it weighs against other versions.

test

>it is souless because I say so

i'm playing it, it's good for me what the fuck can i say, i'm sorry i'm having fun

>it isn't souless because it's from Nintendo

Attached: 1551460987800.png (698x846, 178K)

Sorry you have no standards.

I just beat the first dungeon.
So far, everything was signficantly easier than the fishing mini-game.
You now remember the fishing mini-game is one of the hardest part of the game

>Links Shield no longer has it's kino original Links Awakening design as a cool little celtic style tower shield, instead it's just the fucking Ocarina hylian shield which is mad fucking lazy
>Art style in general is shit, too much gloss and plastic, the game would look much better more chalky and pastel
>Framerate drops out the ass, fucking absolute bullshit given the kind of game it is, a locked camera perspective with literally 3 enemies max on screen and repeated assets fucking everywhere
>Music is kind of shit, whoever remade it missed alot of the good moments in the melodies and had them too muted or low noted

Overall 6/10, I expected better. Links Awakening deserved better. I think most people would've rather had a new spiritual sequel ala Link Between Worlds was to ALTTP with a more serious art style.

Enjoy your high standards from your high horse, i'll keep having fun

>user score is higher than critic score

For now.

Attached: unnamed.jpg (900x900, 89K)

>wah wah stop criticizing my GAAAME

Gonna give you a (You) before all the snoy posts come in.

>Fun
That is a buzzword here.

BASED. This game is CRINGE

>WAAAAH! STOP ENJOYING THINGS!
>REEEEEEE! DON'T GIVE BIN NINTENDO MONEY!
why COPE so much?

The word used when it's impossible to argue for it. It's literally a game boy port with playdoh graphics. And it's 60 dollars. Unbelievable.

Actually based

Links Awakening shield design was honestly one of the best ones. Hylian shield is busy ugly shit that only made sense in Ocarina

The best shield designs here are Links Awakening > ALTTP > Wind Waker > Spirit Tracks > Everything else

Attached: shields.jpg (1920x1200, 1.48M)

I've noticed many user seem to be unaware that there's a dungeon creator in this. Mind you, I believe it's only collectible rooms that you can arrange into your own creat-a-dungeon.

Do you know how to read?, Is not 4 hours lon.

Why?

Yes. Good to know someone else thinks Sony is superior.

>this coping

Attached: vampire.png (664x451, 180K)

It's a good game though

Anyone else experience a hard lock? Went to the library and started reading the book on bombs and the game hard locked on me. Undocked it and the whole system crashed.

>the story is the same tired old bland zelda

The literal selling point of the game is that is not the same Zelda story, hell, the game was created because Takashi Tezuka was tired of the old Zelda story.

How can someone be so wrong?

ignorant post-anime jojofaggot

It has the color dungeon so I assume so

it's hard to go wrong with one of the best handheld Zelda titles but I disagree about the toy look decision but we'll leave it at that, I just hope for the ALBW art style to make a comeback for a new entry or a remake of Oracles/Minish Cape