Is it bad that I think that if a game offers me less than 50 hours of entertainment it was a waste of money?
Is it bad that I think that if a game offers me less than 50 hours of entertainment it was a waste of money?
Other urls found in this thread:
store.steampowered.com
twitter.com
You do you bud, but I'd prefer a game that is fun for 4 hours than a slog of garbage that takes 60 hours of trash for 2 hours of fun.
"Boy this is the best goddamn game I've played in my life"
>Credits roll, playtime shows it lasted 49 hours with 59 minutes*
"RIPPED OFF AGAIN"
literally this
Yes. You like being busy more than being entertained or any other thing.
Nah, I love RPGs because of that. Especially if they have replayability.
I felt that way in school because I only got 4 games all year during winter due to xmas and the placement of my birthday. As a working adult, entertainment value trumps all. I enjoyed parts of Wasteland 2 but it was seriously way too long. Haven't touched a JRPG in years, and I've been avoiding open world busywork like the plague
depends on the cost
kek
Yes
What if the game only cost $25?