So what if they're splitting the game up into 3+ pieces and charging your $180...

>Thinking $180 over the course of a decade is a lot of money
>w e w

$180 for one game and one story is criminal.

If you pay that, you're a fucking moron.

im not, because i like what i see.
You think that i buy stuff because i HAVE to, not because i like them. I dont think ive ever bought a game that i dislike. If that would be the case, i would have bought XV, XIII and its trilogy just because their name.

If you fork over $180 for one game you're a slave to that company. No game is worth more than $60. I don't care if it's 3+ "episodes" the length of a "full game", which varies wildly by the way, it's still all one game and you're still paying $180 for one fucking game.

Wait did they actually confirm that they are charging full price for each part of the game now?

Why did nobody complain when Mass Effect did it?

Hey retard, I already know the ending. I'm not playing for the story.

the only people complaining about the price are the retards who will buy each piece day 1. just wait until square bundles the 'collectors edition' together, you impatient mung

no, im spending 180$ for three games.
And depending on how is the first game, i'll just spend 60$ for one game. Seems fair

A:
>get a wholly remade three-segmented game with expanded upon sections of original game, with new content, no content cuts and more depth
B: Get a one part rushed, crammed in remake that tries to technologically tackle the content expanse the original game head

Jewing aside, it's a more sensible choice, thought I still believe they could've gone with two parts.