Reikon Games just because, right now, it's the only company I have any sympathy for and I know that, given the oportunity, they'd do their best to give fans the kind of content they want.
Which would be the best new developer for Fallout's IP?(Hard mode: no Obsidian)
Jason Murphy
Julian Foster
>CDPR
Only if they get rid of that dumbfuck who wrote dialogs for main quest of tw3
Isaiah Lewis
InXile
Easton Miller
>coherent and interesting story at least.
>TW3
Did you even finish TW3 main story?
Nolan Fisher
inXile Entertainment
Cameron Mitchell
>Which would be the best new developer for Fallout's IP?
Why not making a new and better one? Fallout is filled with bullshit and Bethesda shitting on the lore as well doesn't help plus the damn 50's are boring.
Jackson Evans
if not Obsidian then Arkane. they're at least owned by zenimax so it's plausible.
Also a theoretically new fallout game should move away from a giant sandbox map, and instead have a series of smaller maps that you can travel between with varying methods, each map being about the size of a DLC area. Sort of like how FO1/2's map worked.
Parker Martinez
Honestly this. Obsidian's entire message with NV is "let go" for a reason. NV's story does a decent job of capping off the overarching story of fallout anyway.
And the problem with a post-apocalyptic setting is that the further in time you go, the less apocalyptic it is. Just look how fucking dumb FO3/FO4 feel being set 200+ years after the bombs and the places still looking like the nukes were a decade ago, with nothing changing at all since then.
Brody Watson
>implying nuObsidian would be good
You shills are hilariously pathetic. Obsidian has been shit years now.
Luis Jackson
>Just look how fucking dumb FO3/FO4 feel being set 200+ years after the bombs and the places still looking like the nukes were a decade ago,
Wow, just like New Vegas. Why do obsidiot shills bitch about shit in FO3/4 that is also present in NV?