Fallout 3 vs Fallout 4. Which game had worse writing?

>bullet sponge

Attached: 491AA913-EEE3-4060-959F-BFF3C50D38F3.png (1146x792, 831K)

Me on the left
Yea Forums on the right

Nobody's expecting a small band of survivors to have cleaned up an entire destroyed city. The point is that people living in Bethesda's Fallout more often than not don't clean up at all; people just leave piles of random, often potentially dangerous shit like corpses or jagged chunks of rusted metal laying around their immediate living environments.

Was Autumn truly the best bet for survival in the capital wasteland?

This.

Fallout 3 has a story.
Fallout 4 is a clusterfuck of poorly implemented rollercoaster rides.

Unless it's family don't expect people to to bury enemies. Have you looked at Syria for example? Also people are fucking dumb, they are living in a slum/ favala situation and exposed wires, steel rods crumbled concrete and trash is literally everywhere in Brazils slums, inside their homes even. Humans aren't Noble, you won't see them cleaning up a large area and wearing flannel and acting civil. Those people are stuck in a concrete death trap and most don't leave, seeing rubble is all they know and becoming desensitized and uncaring towards mess is what will happen. if you grew up in a shit hole you won't start cleaning, you'll just assume a shit hole is the normal to everybody.

If we simply compare the main story I would say 4 is actually better. Seeing Shaun in the institute has way more impact than meeting dad in 3. 3 never really has any feeling of climax. The ending also really sucks.

>Fallout 4 is a clusterfuck of poorly implemented rollercoaster rides.
even if you try to avoid SHAUN! you are forced to play that hand countless times.. so.. gonna THIS you

fpbp

Attached: 1560455618498.png (1280x720, 1.53M)