Do they hold up?

Do they hold up?

Attached: ME1-and-2.jpg (1212x598, 650K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=xcvtMB10IIU
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

The one on the left does. I suppose the one on the right does too, since it's just as shit as the day it was released.

Andromeda>ME3

The first still tells a great story and constructs a memorable universe. The second still gives you a lot of engaging vignettes with great characters and fun combat. The story in the second is shit and the world building is absent but at least the ending is satisfying within the context of its own game. ME2 was a misstep but it didn't piss people off or ruin the franchise like three.

ruined by the 3rd.

ME1 is a fun game with compelling choices, character building (both in dialogue and in skills/stats), and a bunch of content.
ME2 is for normies and is just a mediocre shooter.

Not really, no. Both of them have meme stories and the gameplay hasn't aged well. Play something else.

for what it is mass effect 2 holds up great, but its not a seqeul to mass effect at all.
original ME is perfection no matter how much time passes.

I agree I played 1 not too long ago and it still holds up.

>ME2 is for normies
ME1 was for normies. It's blatantly for normies. The whole thing is pretending to be a Hollywood film. Not-normie Bioware is shit like Baldur's Gate, not Mass Effect.