Which do you prefer and why? I think Galaxy 2 is a better game, but 1 was more memorable

>1 better music
2 has all the best tracks from 1 plus a ton of new great ones

I like how "mature" galaxy 1 felt. Like, fucking obviously it's Mario, but it still had a lost in space kind of feel. 2 tried to feel cartoony like NSMB but in 3D.

youtube.com/watch?v=W8ixpB2JD04
youtube.com/watch?v=6LDnsDuSimc

I prefer 1. I like the hub better, and I prefer the levels. Both are great games.

Are there any good Super Mario Galaxy mods?

I play SMG2 first and SMG later. I can say 1 was most charming and the observatory is better than the Mario head spaceship.

Only one off the top of my head is Neo Mario Galaxy. It's only 22 stars, but it's still worth a playthrough.
youtube.com/watch?v=W6VLtKUgHrE

Attached: cover-256.png (360x256, 127K)

1 is timeless, 2 is just another 3D Mario.

Objectively 1. 2 is just DLC made into a soulless game. If online DLC was a thing when SMG1 happened, there wouldn't have been a SMG2 and you know it. Or they could have just done what games like Sonic Mania or old SF games did, make a "definitive" version with the extra content.

So again, it's 1. One was a passion product, 2 is soulless cash grab. Of course it would have "been better" it was made after the first games practice run was done and the devs got the swing of things. That's not an argument. A real sequel would have be a direct continuation of the last game without being a shameless reboot to please Miyamoto's hateboner for plot in a Mario game.

Attached: 8166e2a69de8ae9692bb9d917738111f.jpg (1191x670, 82K)

Nintendo came right out and said they made 2 because they thought they had too many ideas for dlc.

Yoshi levels are shit so 1 wins, plus 1 is less linear