Thoughts?
Thoughts?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
yeah i got your thought right here buddy *grabs dick*
>caring about women
Why does the world lie?
based faggot
>Survey about skill
That sounds legit.
>thoughts
Yeah I got some, like who would fund such pointless research?
This is why women have to have their own tournaments rather than participating in free-for-everyone ones, right?
This is why game ladder contains 95% men, 4% trannies and 1% men?
Shit study
spbp
>Matchmaking rating per month
I mean of course going from shit rating to less shit rating is going to be easier than going from high to higher.
Who’s your favorite female dota pro, bros? Or not even a pro but at least somebody who’s in the top200 mmr of their region.
Is this graph supposed to mean something? Maybe it's because I don't play moba trash.
sheepsticked
she cute
>hardcore women gamers
Now there's an oxymoron if I've ever seen one
>hardcore women gamers
Woman who take multiple dick while playing games
>hardcore gamer woman
Woman who play games in a hardcore manner
What is so hard to understand this very simple distinction of the English language?
would be neat but most likely just some clickbait
>advanced englsih
well pretty easy to go from 0-1 than it does to go from 50-100 in skill level
Men don't need to improve. We're already better.
I don't know how to read this graph can someone explain
the future is female
HAHAHA, there was a female team in League who play vs a boy team, guess what happen ? the girl team get BTFO hard before 15 min mark, and this is not the worst thing, there was another game where woman team BTFO so hard, the gold difference was over 30k
I have a sneaking suspicion that their methodology was biased to produce a desired result.
Find it hard to believe, especially since ive never met a girl who played vidya
The people who did the poll are liars.
i love the made up metrics you need to damage control for women being bad at everything, like you always hear women should be good pilots and astronauts but it never actually happens
>women who don't have any jobs or responsibilities "improve faster" because they coincidentally spent more time on the game
>meanwhile we're going to separate all men who play the games into different categories so that a direct comparison isn't actually being made
>falling for SJW propoganda
Americans are so retarded I don't even
what the fuck is going on in this chart. what am i supposed to compare women with?
Married men, obviously.
fuck off tard
Now put them in a competition where they're not constantly coddled or have rules made up for them and we'll see.
Graph is a little confusing...?
Are they saying a "hardcore" female gamer has a higher average rating than a casual non-hardcore male gamer?
Last time I checked, if a HUMAN spent a lot of time on something, they would get good at it. And if that something wasn't a physically demanding sport like rugby, then gender doesn't matter.
The fucking agenda some journalist have....
How is 200 mmr even considered an improvement in a month where you try hard?
If you start out as a low/mid tier player gaining mmr is so fucking easy when you start applying yourself
>Girls
So we're going to have all of these factors, and then just shoehorn in "girls" as well?
They may as well be "Female players who never travel," because that's all we've fucking got.
And I guess that means that men are still better when they aren't being impeded by other livelihood stuffs.
460139318
And then what?
nice chart, gave me a laugh
what's gosu.ai? it's one of those fortnite classes that people used to make fun some time ago? Wouldn't that just mean that a random girl online probably would be better than someone who takes fortnite classes? Why would they want to show that their system is shit?
>ADVANCED ENGLSIH
>Put pro "woman" against a team of pub retards.
>Pub shitters win every single fucking time.
Have sex.
women are too shit to even compete in hearthstone esports
based
already did plenty of times, butthole
>"woman"
thats just a tranny then
>avg dota 2 user
Whole lot of cope in this thread from the inferior sex males.
Find a stable relationship.
then why are women so bad at video games
there isnt a single woman at top level competitive gaming
>b-b-but sexism
girl detected
What is the overall men vs women? It feels like this data is being manipulated
The most skilled person I know at vidya is a girl, but shes an outlier compared to the other girls I play with
probably true, it works that way in school as well; women are remarkably good at absorbing lots of low end information very quickly, then hitting the skill ceiling long before a male does and never surpassing it.
Well, I never travel, why i'm still shit then?
What the fuck are these categories?
>Works out 4 times a week
>Advanced English
Is this just meant to confuse me?
Absorbing info is one thing.
Having discipline and reflexes do play at pro level is another story.
improve their skills faster is such a nothing qualifier.
can't believe I'm the first person to post this but
>"women"
>survey
They get complacent when they receive as much attention as they want. Anything more than that becomes bothersome. They're not in it to succeed. They're fraudulent. They're not driven by the compulsion to test their strength or become the best. They get diminishing returns for what they truly want pretty early on, and anything after that is just wasted effort according to them. Being at the top isn't realistically any different for them than being one of the best girls. They're competing for male attention, so all they need to do is stand out from other women.
It's of course a different dynamic when it comes to female-oriented interests or activities, but this is video games designed by males for males that succeed in tapping into the instinctively male subconscious that rewards them for solving problems and completing difficult tasks. Womens' brains simply don't reward them in the same way for these things so of course women aren't going to be as motivated. That's straight up biology; one of the physiological differences between human males and females.
They just improved faster. So if you were already good at most games and it took you months to break your plateau into actual competitive levels of play, you would look worse in this study than a woman walking into walls figuring out how to turn the camera
when women play dota 2 they play in 4 stacks with men who carry them. that's why their mmr goes up.
let's see solo mmr graph.
Methodology isn't posted but I'm sure it's flawed
fits too nicely into the "Girl power" narrative.. how come the pro teams aren't made up of (female) girls?
Is LoL the game where the male team started to fuck around to extend the match and do a lot of uneeded things to win just to shove it in the girls faces more?
and how many of those women were carried to their higher ranks? i played upwards of 1000 matches of competitive in cs go at around the MGE level and i literally ran into 1 female who could carry her weight and was actually better than me and my friends. Every other female we ran into was surrounded by 2-3 guys who were clearly a higher rank and were doing all the work on the team.
>advanced englsih
That's not what this data is describing at all.
But they level out so much sooner. Men hit a much higher ceiling generally speaking.
Yeah, now show us women who climb mmr solo, not getting carried by the orbiters
improving faster doesn't mean they're any good at it
The girls i've played with alot with in groups are probably below average even when playing alot of multiplayer games. What I noticed is that they dont try anything new on their own, they just stick to a formula by imitating others and cant really improvise or adapt on the fly when needed.
It's comparing women (along with men pretending to be women) with free time to men who do things other than play video games. Men who stay home all the time of course have higher skill than them.
(((Woman))) sure thing
>average dota 2 user: 0
i am not a math man like our pal archimedes, but i am pretty sure that averages don't work that way
Yes and it's even more funny that the girls were playing their usually positions while the guys were just fucking around role swapping.
The worse you are the easier it is to get better.
(as long as the men have other things to do than video games such as having a wife, having school, or having a job)
geg
I'm gonna guess that maybe MMR change is zero sum?
Reminder that this is literally based on people picking "I am a girl" in the registration process.
Lol.
It's probably why they like MMO's so much doing raids you just autisticaly repeat the same shit over and over again. and ofcourse the social aspect of of MMO's
yet all the top players winning tournaments and shit are always men.
why is that?
When Overwatch was at the height of its popularity, there was this girl who played 12+ hours per day every day, for months, and she struggled to stay in GM & regularly lost to dudes who played a couple hours on the weekends. I'm pretty sure women are just biologically not able to reach the male level.
It's really bizarre because some would claim it's because we don't encourage girls to play games during developmental years which I'm sure has impact but I've known families where the father is a game dev so all of his kids mostly played Vidya growing up and his daughter, although better than most girls, is just flat out not capable of competing at the same high level the guys are. She can get pretty far but just doesn't hit that top and seems to work harder for it.
I travelled and my vidya skills went to shit it's true.
Then I got a 4k 100hz display and kick ass
Leftie 101 is claiming sociological reasons for biological phenomena. No proof, just claim it, that's plenty enough for wishful thinking.
Probably counts trannies as women
isn't the average person who picks "female" on those pages usually a guy having a laugh, a guy avoiding entering any personal information, etc.?
It's "hardcore women gamers" that carried by the average male gamer lol.
>is not bad
So mental illness gets a free pass? No thanks """""women"""""
The week Mercy got that big nerf in Overwatch (I think it was season 5?) was insane to watch. A bunch of men dropped their female mercy main duos, and you could see people with season highs of 4000-4300+ drop down to silver and gold.
>Actually put effort in for once
>Go from basically standing there like a potato to playing at the level of an average 8 year old
>Compared to someone who actually plays games working to improve on their current skillset
Totally legit
It's funny how the elites are constantly struggling with the fact that skill is the one thing you can't buy, or give away to your buddies nepotistically.
Does that count actual women, or does it include """"""""women"""""""" too?
You're not supposed to ask those sorts of questions, wrongthinker.
>Split men into 7 different categories
>Put women all in one category
who cares
Nobody would care that it's true if it's true. The problem is it's not true. That's what people care about. They care about being lied to.
>meanwhile we're going to separate all men who play the games into different categories so that a direct comparison isn't actually being made
holy fuck this
Not that I believe this """research""" (((SURVEY))) to begin with
>smelly
>pajamas
There are some f*males in almost-high tier pubs (from 1k rating to 200) but none of them have ever had any kind of success in any tournament above tier 2 teams, as far as I'm aware.
It should be noted that the highest tier of play involves more than raw mech skill, so the fact that they may not have found a proper team enviroment COULD be a factor (but I doubt it)
I assume that's the case too, the "average"user doesn't improve by definition
Guarantee they're going off mmr or whatever
Girl gamers play supports, find a white knight and get carried hard as fuck.
Watch any high level stack stream, the girl is the worst member 95% of the time and spends all game wandering around warding and doing whatever the carry tells her over voice chat.
Dont get me wrong, that's the right thing to do in that situation and they're being a credit to the team by playing within their competency, but it does not let you get an accurate idea of their ability.
>Advanced Englsih
>ENGLSIH
Nice research, women.