Is there a single valid argument against including an easy mode in Dark Souls...

Is there a single valid argument against including an easy mode in Dark Souls? If it's optional I see no reason not to allow it.

Attached: Jim Sterling.png (869x659, 1.01M)

Other urls found in this thread:

nad.org/resources/technology/captioning-for-access/when-is-captioning-required/
youtube.com/watch?v=iPqjl_DNpqk
youtube.com/watch?v=MVHuCyvrpxc
youtube.com/watch?v=uY6x7RgcwF4
youtube.com/watch?v=AVrQcFUFoRU
youtube.com/watch?v=5fn-XVM7-FM
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

No.

Git gud

Attached: 1553644869009.webm (720x404, 2.54M)

Yes, actually.
The developers didn't wanna put an easy mode in and that's their choice, whiny children who are shit at games should just accept that it wasn't made for them.
The end.
/thread.
Go home.

The dev time is better spent making new games. Go summon some smurfs or get yourself a gameshark, which is also optional.

BLOODY ELL JIZZ ON ME OWN FACE STERLING

Attached: 2e8.jpg (1900x1211, 373K)

adding an easy mode will certainly make a game more accessible to casuals but ultimately the decision is made by the gamemaker depending on their goals

based

There is an easy mode in Dark Souls. it's called summoning. You literally let other people play the game for you.

Attached: 1553627234010.png (604x437, 503K)

>developer's intentions
You could use that argument to deflect literally any criticism against any game ever made.

You also have to be against things like modding if you advance this argument. Is modding Skyrim an unacceptable violation of Todd Howard's vision?