Why is everyone so critical of game streaming? You know this is a very early gen technology right...

Why is everyone so critical of game streaming? You know this is a very early gen technology right? You know technology gets improved right? What sets game streaming apart?

Attached: uploads%2Fcard%2Fimage%2F954294%2F9354779a-9e68-4129-bd77-432512d23c17.jpg%2F950x534__filters%3Aqual (950x534, 89K)

You don't own anything. That alone is enough to make it irredeemably shit. At least with digital download you can dump the files and keep/spread them around after the servers go down. With streaming you're SOL

The main block game sreaming must over one isn't encryption or horsepower-based. The US data infrastructure is complete shit and cannot support this implementation. It simply does not provide stable delivery.

>you dont own anything
Streaming games over shitty American us retarded, but not as retarded as you.

News flash: you don't and never did own any software you didnt code yourself

Only trailer park people are complain

Attached: fw1.jpg (1941x2207, 2.68M)

Fpbp

Games as a service is cancer. Same with asspulling everything as a service. It's a clear messge to stop consuming.

>heh but the eula/tos says you're only licensing it, so you don't own it either way!
You know exactly what I meant when I said that, fuck off

The fact it will introduce any kind of extra lag to the game at all makes it a big fat NOPE for me.

>no action,fps,fighting games
Turn based card games, maybe, but I've tried something similar like that before too, and it was also shit.
So meh. Yeah. Nah. No thanks.

>You know this is a very early gen technology right?
It's not though. OnLive launched almost a decade ago and now Sony owns everything they ever did lol.

People that defend google and stadia are cattle.

Low iq zoomer response.

You do own anything/piece of software you paid for You don't own the IP said authorized copy came from

Attached: 1536667724433.jpg (294x294, 19K)

ACKSHULLY you own a license for the software.

My problem with stadia is simply it's too far ahead of it's time. Theres no doubt game streaming is the next big thing to take over but with the current cable/fiber internet structure the latency simply is too much for fast paced games. Bring a ton of turn based rpgs, puzzle games, party games, simulation games and such to it now and itll work fine but FPS like DOOM and action adventure games that require quick precision for things like dodging and parrying wont work with how it is currently. The wireless controller idea they came up with to reduce latency is brilliant, but it's not good enough yet for an enjoyable experience.

Nope, a physical copy of it. You can do whatever you want with it.

more like advertising

>every single time it has been tired it was a fucking failure
gee i don't know user

release when it's actually worth while dipshit

5 frame input lag

Because in general, technology improvements serve to enhance the experience. If you go back and play PS2 games and whatever nowadays they generally play like crap because technology has improved to the point where devs can make games feel a lot smoother to play.

Game streaming diminishes the experience. There's going to be some minor latency. If your connection drops, you're gone, if they're having issues, you get issues. Sure it sounds convenient in some ways. You don't have to have the console around, you don't have to wait for the game to download, etc. But I don't really prioritise those things. I wouldn't make the trade.

>play PS2 games and whatever nowadays they generally play like crap because technology has improved to the point where devs can make games feel a lot smoother to play
What does that even mean? Why would more powerful hardware result in better controls? How old are you?