What did game critics want Ubisoft to say?

I prefer if they just made a game with more than an hour of unique content.

Attached: 1348752739020.gif (350x250, 1016K)

I can only recall two minor allusions to Trump in FC5.
I really don't know why people look to Ubisoft games for deep, intricate political commentary. Most of their games have atrocious stories, though the cast of Far Cry 5 is great.

I wouldn't be surprised if that professor was fired in this climate. It's not like African/Muslim societies treat their women like dirt or anything.

Because Ubisoft release games with immense political baggage but then never engage with the political baggage that they are choosing to bring into their game.

People call activision out on it in CoD all the time as well. Take advanced warfare which for a while was this interestingly nuanced story... and then they made the main antagonist a pure monster and turned a pretty anti-war narrative into. "war is okay, as long as america wins"

You don't get to have your cake and eat it to, if you want to have a game which starts out by injecting itself right into the middle of the current gun debate in the US, don't fucking try to say you aren't being political.

>"war is okay, as long as america wins"
This is 100% true though. Seething Muslopean detected.

Many leftists have literally called for the workers to arm themselves for decades. The term you're looking for is "neoliberal shills"

The only times in modern history we've had similar situations to the division happen, literally the exact opposite happened. Read accounts from Sarajevo some time.

but none of those games do that

The Division has fuck all to do with gun control other than stating the very true fact that:

If society goes to shit, the guy with the gun will do better than the guy without

Why does that bother you?
>t. don't own a gun

>mom is super anti-gun and thinks they should be illegal to everyone "except the police and the military"
>all my family save myself lives way out in the boonies in the middle of nowhere, 40 minutes from the nearest town with a police station
>heard her arguing with my uncle during Christmas last year, and he asked her "So what should you do if some armed psychopath invades your home in the middle of the night, wouldn't a gun be useful then?
>She said "No, you don't need a gun for that. That's what 911 is for."

I'm convinced at this point that we can just go ahead and classify liberalism as a mental disorder.

>The only times in modern history we've had similar situations to the division happen
Literally no scenario in real life comes close to what happens in The Division. We're talking super AIDS wiping out the majority of America.

Leftists want "everyone" to have guns... but then seize them at gunpoint once they take control.