AMD BTFO Intel on the CPU side

*ahem*

OpenGL

YIKES

Attached: performance-per-watt_3840-2160.png (500x810, 44K)

Depending on the rest of your system, and what sort of gaming experience you find acceptable, sure but try to talk him down price-wise. Its a decent stop-gap that should get you to the end of the Windows-era and a bit beyond if you're playing mostly non-demanding games at low console-style resolutions.

You should keep in mind though that if you keep cards that long you'd probably do better buying AMD in the future.

ray tracing was cool but shouldnt have been implement yet, they should just have showed like hey we are working at ray tracing it will be available in just a few years!! In the meanwhile have some beefy cards!

AMD cards continue being a housefire with broken drivers and the fac that they're like 2% of the market is nobody's fault but their own.
Source: I own a rx480

Cause vaga is a garbage housefire that's way more expensive than the 1660ti.
Even a 2060 is cheaper and miles better.

Fuck you and whoever made this thread for making me waste 3 minutes in paint

On Linux, there's usermade drivers for AMD cards that literally offer basically double the speed and compatibility over AMD's own drivers.
No such thing for Windows unfortunately since Linux fags don't give a shit about Wangablows.

>AMD, on the other hand, has not been competitive at all in this space and their Vega GPU still suffers from supply issues
maybe ayymd would over take nvidya if they were so goddamn lazy

Attached: lmao.jpg (2426x604, 326K)

>amd requires double the power for the same or less performance