There is nothing wrong with this. I don't see why anyone is complaining. $93 is nothing if you have a job...

IT'S OK WHEN BASED PHIL DOES IT

they pissed off the whales to attract the e-sports (video games will never be a sport go fuck yourselves) crowd so I don't see how this will work well.

In DOA5 if you didnt own the same DLC as your opponent online, you saw their character in default outfit.

Did they fix this in doa6? Because when the sctub on other side cant even see you spend extra 100$ on fake polygon tits, then whats the point?

Attached: 1551321902791.jpg (354x472, 90K)

DOA hasn't been good for over a decade. It's pure waifufaggotry now. Itagaki was just perverted, but he made actual fighting games.

whats wrong with the gameplay in this one

it's a video game you moron

there's such a thing as diminishing return upon an investment. especially an investment that's so fucking insignificant in the grand scheme of things. It's just not worth 100bucks to have a little bit of extra content.

That's like defending ice cream costing 100$

On Eurogamer they have problem with jiggling boobs instead of expensive DLC's.

Attached: DOA6EGED.png (286x471, 178K)

Eurogamer is openly political.
They refused to rate DoA. Their review mentioned zero gameplay or features but it did mention Trump.

Attached: 1532050781857.png (400x800, 7K)