Why is it that the worlds best writers are right wing...

why is it that the worlds best writers are right wing? Is it mere happenstance or is there something about being right wing that makes someone more conducive to being a better writer?

Attached: leo-tolstoyjpg.jpg (1200x1200, 174.1K)

Other urls found in this thread:

mobile.twitter.com/Trad_West_Art
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Define right wing.

you mean conservatives? or traditionals?

you need to build up on the things your predecessors left you, in every aspect of life
fuck you for low hanging baiting

Tolstoy was a big, fat lefty.

Leftists are physically, mentally and spiritually inferior. Right wingers are stronger, better-looking, earn more when you leave out globalist billionaires, less likely to suffer from mental illness (no surprise here whatsoever), have stronger families, etc., all of this being confirmed by scientific research. Just looking at the last 100 years, it has pretty much been a constant shift to the left, thanks to a decadent society and the jewish lobby/bankers who have been socially engineering everybody for the planned one world government. Leftists are more concerned about tranny mental patients and chimp representation in media, right wingers are more concerned with things that actually matter.

For example, right wingers go after people with massive institutional power like bill gates, klaus schwab and the wef, megacorps like jewgle, etc. while the left piss and shit themselves over joe rogan saying nigger or having a doctor on who is skeptical of the experimental gene therapy jab. Right wingers in general are either aristocratic or honest working class, whereas leftists are petty bourgeois and theyre globalist masters

Link to the research? I know some le science liberals I could send it to, let them choke on their own shitty principles.

Left wing people are detached from the visceral, the instinctual. It is a nature overthrowing ideology.

Attached: Jonathan Bowden.jpg (198x255, 9.49K)

This

>you need to build up on the things your predecessors left you, in every aspect of life
Right wingers say you should get stem degree and work for international corporations and never bother with art and culture that's for gays. Does that make me a good writer?

>posts a leftist

Tolstoy was a Georgist

in a modern context his views on women, family, god, national identity, etc would make him a literal nazi

I think it’s safe to say that late stage Tolstoy would have been liberal in today’s age.

Never post such retarded bugbrain nonsense on this board again. Thank you.

>the /pol/nigger unironically thinks that his shitposting about Klaus Schwab is an act of heroism because he is shitposting about someone he thinks is important
Here's the real redpill: anyone who discusses politics on the internet is extremely gay. As an activity, posting about politics on the internet is even gayer than gay sex. This is irrefutable. Left right or center, doesn't matter, all gay.

>in a modern context his views on women, family, god, national identity, etc would make him a literal nazi
in a modern context his views on state, labor, violence, property, etc would make him a literal communist

It's almost like actual people with real ideas and beliefs refuse to fit into your directionlet fleabrain.

Based.

not him but the evolution of politics from 2012-2016 shows that online discourse can have an absolutely massive impact on the political landscape

nothing about what I said is "directionlet", im not OP

This would serve to make homosexual ass-faggotry into a pillar of the conteporary political institution, if only it was not such a pillar from the moment political landscape came into being.

May Allah strike me down if I don't speak true, but when a wild ancestor of man was buggered in the African savannah by another man for the first time - he became the first political expert.

>May Allah strike me down if I don't speak true, but when a wild ancestor of man was buggered in the African savannah by another man for the first time - he became the first political expert.
Based as fuck

Revolting. Politics and its slaves really are vitriolic.

God should be capitalized.

>right-wing=pro-capitalist
retardation

Tolstoy was a proto-hippie. You can't get retroactivelt more 'liberal lefty' than that.

>Tolstoy was a proto-hippie
Nah. Hippies hate work. Tolstoy found nothing better and more noble than hard physical labor.

Great writers are always counter culture. Russia was going through a far left uprising at the time so of course he was against it. He was far from "right wing" though

he became a celibate monk type figure, not a hippie at all

>Great writers are always counter culture. Russia was going through a far left uprising at the time so of course he was against it.
Tolstoy was counter-culture to Tsarism and the aristocratic culture though. Did you actually read anything by him? Or consider the fact that half his works were banned from legal publication by the Tsarist censorship? That he was excommunicated by the Russian Orthodox Church? His intense disagreements with the conservative thinkers of his time?

For fuck's sake. Why are pseuds always like this?

>caring about impact
>caring about societal direction
>caring about "discourse"

There's no discourse online. It's all echochambers and ape-like tribalism.

>It's all echochambers and ape-like tribalism.
Yes? That's what a discourse is.

No, it's not. And if you think it is, you are retarded and beyond redemption.

How is being anti-tsarist exclusive to being anti far left?

Reading comprehension.

>No, it's not.
Yes it is. There is no discourse, academic or bohemian, that is not built largely on echochambers and tribalism. It's alright tho, works out just fine.

So you are retarded then.

Elaborate on your position.

Tolstoy has criticized both sides.

Reading comprehension, user.

Yes, You don't seem to have t.

But that is what right wingers are. Are you making a distinction between 'right wingers' and 'right wing'?

user, you do realize that liberals are also pro capitalist right?

Weird because all the shit posters here are from /pol/

WISDOM OF GOD

Attached: 1472217980083.jpg (589x222, 34.04K)

How is that related to my question at all? You just dont get it.

GO BACK

Attached: 1649068057307m.jpg (666x1024, 137.99K)

Monarchists were stronger and richer back in the day as well. That doesn't mean their ideology is inherently superior. Obviously the strongest supporters of a hierarchical system are going to be those people that benefit the most from it.

>Leftists are more concerned about tranny mental patients
Projection. Rightists discuss trans people all the fucking time. Literally every thread with a high density of right wingers will have trans issues mentioned. /pol/ has dedicated round-the-clock threads about them including four at the time of writing. I know more about Blanchard's transsexual typology from rightist shitposts than I do from reading the Jacobin or whatever.

Attached: Facebook interactions on all trans-related posts.jpg (1024x972, 336.27K)

I never said that he was not anti "far left", if you try and single out something like a "far left" in mid XIX century Russia.

The thing is right wing views don't necessarily correlate with income, in fact it's often the opposite.

It's a function of income and testosterone levels.

Rich and high test men are right wing.
Rich and low test men are left wing.

Poor and high test men are left wing.
Poor and low test men are right wing.

>Poor and high test men are left wing.
Is this nigga serious?

>the poor low test man shows himself

Right wing views are predicated on healthy respect for tradition and logic while left wing views are predicated on disdain for authority and the willingness to thumb your nose at tradition for greater personal freedoms to be a degenerate.

Attached: 1624599380508.jpg (1280x1620, 569.59K)

>for greater personal freedoms to be a degenerate
Yes, so?

t.

Attached: 19891.jpg (1000x600, 183.47K)

Indeed, Napoleon was a tranny

I mean left wing thought is ultimately facile because they view societies as artificial constructs to be moulded in the ways they wish and they ways they wish to change society are always the ways that give them ever greater licence to indulge in their hedonistic desires.

Civilizations are organic, you cannot mould one according to abstract theories any more than you can suddenly go from being the child of your parents to the child of some other people unrelated to you.

>any more than you can suddenly go from being the child of your parents to the child of some other people unrelated to you.
Uhm... who's gonna tell him about adoption?

Legal fiction that has no bearing on reality. Your genes come from two people only. This is and always will be the truth.

Hedonism is organic

Doesn't matter, meaningfully the parents are who raise the kid.

>Legal fiction that has no bearing on reality.
Uhm... who's gonna tell him about civilization?

I dont get why so many poltards simp for right wing. There is no real difference between leolib and any right wing movement.
>Right wing views are predicated on healthy respect for tradition and logic
Yeah well right wingers hate culture, art, literature, music, cities their ancestors spent centuries building. Right wingers love international corporations, stem slaving and being individualist.
Right wingers support population replacement and outsourcing jobs. Ask any right winger should you get a degree in arts or literature and they'll laugh at you and advice you to become a stem bug. Right wingers agree that you should abandon cities (your ancestors built those cities) to live alone innawoods. That's how much right wingers love tradition and their own culture. Most right wingers agree that free markets are sacred and morality doesn't exist if something generates income.

>healthy respect for tradition
Except it's not healthy, it's regularly dogmatic and uncompromising, upholding power structures with no basis.
Modernity being cringe doesn't mean you should fall into some revisionist aesthetical traditionalism.

>Yeah well right wingers hate culture, art, literature, music, cities their ancestors spent centuries building.
No they don't, in fact you'll find the right has a love of aesthetic the left completely lacks.

mobile.twitter.com/Trad_West_Art

>Right wingers love international corporations, stem slaving and being individualist.
The international corporations pushing globohomo? No.

>Right wingers support population replacement and outsourcing jobs.
No they don't. You're confusing Reaganite boomers, who are ultimately liberals and men of the left with right wing political thought. Protip if anyone says they think democracy is the best political system they're not right wing.

>no basis
They don't need a basis. Deconstructing your civilization and demanding a rational basis for all tradition is leftist nonsense. Hierarchies are essential.

>No they don't, in fact you'll find the right has a love of aesthetic the left completely lacks.
What are you talking about? Do you have schizophrenia? Left wingers control education, cities, culture, art and music. Right wingers are stem bugs for international corporations or cowards who move away from civilization. So much tradition I guess

>The international corporations pushing globohomo? No.
Tell that to the right wing stem bugs who work for these corporations and make their existence possible

>No they don't. You're confusing Reaganite boomers, who are ultimately liberals and men of the left with right wing political thought. Protip if anyone says they think democracy is the best political system they're not right wing.
Real right wing has never been tried. Ask me how did I anticipate this

Lemme give you a redpill. The "right winger" you're raving against in your head doesn't exist. There are no corporation loving, STEM supremacist, anti Urban, Kaczynskian chuds. "Right wing" and "left wing" are barriers to any actual understanding of politics because you're talking about a disparate collection of ideologies that all hate each other as if they're a coordinated team. Obviously the result seems contradictory when you merge every "right wing" ideology in your head.

Attached: ur,apron_flatlay_front,square,600x600.jpg (600x600, 23.25K)

Ever been to an art history class bro? It's 99% female

>Left wingers control education, cities, culture, art and music
Cities are soulless bugmen hives and the "art" they create is awful marvel capeshit. I thought you were talking about actual art like pic related

Attached: 1631977773217.jpg (1200x1200, 487.57K)