>Instigates a multi-decade long series of death matches over nothing
What was his problem?
Instigates a multi-decade long series of death matches over nothing
Other urls found in this thread:
historicalfencer.com
twitter.com
He was a psychopath. Which actually is a pretty accurate depiction of duelling culture. Most people imagine it was two amateurs fighting a duel over honour that they would do maybe once in their lives. But in reality it was more like extremely experienced fighters with hundreds of duels under their belt going out looking to be offended, then challenging inexperienced duellists over petty insults and killing them. It's one of the major reasons why duelling was banned because it had essentially become a form of legalised serial murder.
good post
Toxic masculinity
Why didn't they just wear armor and award points for touches, rather than fucking dying
>He was a psychopath
This makes sense. Especially given what basically kicked off the feud was the fact that he lost the first duel to D'Hubert in which he himself started. His narcissism couldn't handle losing
Did you miss the part where they both talk about honour throughout the course of the movie?
he gets no bitches
thas why he lost
I'm talking about duels in general
Sounds like a good way to be a pro assassin. They said similar things happened in the wild west, if you wanted to kill someone you just goad them into a pistol fight and claim self defense, have a few friends as witness