In itself of itself now to be here, it cannot only not exist in a togetherness of movements, for on the contrary...

>in itself of itself now to be here, it cannot only not exist in a togetherness of movements, for on the contrary, it is the simple notion of the for itself that negates the essence of the universal now viz., the absolute spirit into which it overcomes
you cant be fucking serious

Attached: hegel.jpg (181x278, 9K)

Other urls found in this thread:

marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/works/hp/hpheraclitus.htm
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

When you retards ask me why I don't read philosophy, here's your answer

>The self is a relation which relates itself to its own self, or it is that in the relation that the relation relates itself to its own self; the self is not the relation but that the relation relates itself to its own self.

Attached: OK6W_koKDTOqqqLDbIoPAh-vxPlAHikMQ1DcUsI1icA.png (602x718, 370K)

The ultimate filter

why wouldn't it be serious?

Attached: 1563052545031.jpg (873x974, 87K)

Reasonable in Fichtean terms.

>卐

The ultimate filter

>tfw you understand this after reading beiser's introduction to hegel

Attached: Knowing.jpg (439x506, 118K)

Isn’t that Victoria Bateman?