Who is the modern day Christopher Hitchens?

Tim Pool is either a cuck selling out his dignity as a lefty to the right or he's plain ol' right wing grifter like Dave Rubin.

Whats the point of e-thots if they don't post feet?

I thought you wanted Vidal's feet.

tim pool isn't even white he's definitely a cuck

That makes no sense.

t. cuck

because Vidal is highly overrated. I'd rather read Pynchon or Melville again.

Me

i cant take vidal seriously ever since he laughed off that gayboys threat to punch his face. pychon is smart enough to not get into that situation, but i believe he'd punch that smug gayboys face off

Nobody wants to admit that Hitchens was just the inferior atheist parody of Chesterton. He, of course, never wanted to be this. He WANTED to be Orwell. He also kind of wanted to be Camus. But in the end, with his eating, his drinking, his smoking, his wittiness, his love of debate, and his overall goal of simultaneously entertaining and informing, Chesterton is the figure from the early 20th Century whom he most resembles. And even then, he's a really, really shitty copy of Chesterton.

Attached: G.K.-Chesterton-smiling.jpg (1258x1600, 381K)

This.

Hitchens never wrote a single novel. Please don't take him as a serious writer. He's just an attention grabbing atheist.

he's a rhetoricist
any of the retards you quoted were probably shit at talking. chris probably wasn't saying anything new or original in the same sense as writers are able to behind their typewriters but he got the effective points across with his cigarette smoke and pussy-magnet rhetoric.
i'll be straight if you hate him you're some gay right winger.

>supported the Iraq war
>if you hate him you're some gay right winger

yes his one mistake. name another.

Nope. I just like serious writers. Hitchens certainly was not one. You can call him whatever you want.

...and btw he loathed being called Chris.

A reverse Hitchens? Why the stretch?

Attached: 69B36605-6864-4F84-8033-0E109DACCBF1.jpg (500x252, 76K)

Getting cancer.

>name another
Being an atheist, a hedonist, a neocon, and having a brother who is more based than him.

Attached: 1568075918183.jpg (480x318, 16K)

>and having a brother who is more based than him.
Peter is a total joke even amongst his own people.

The only valid critique of Hitchens is Vidal’s
The sore-anus Christians should stfu

>The sore-anus Christians should stfu

Attached: 1566658851028.jpg (988x1059, 148K)

Have you ever read Dostoevsky? or maybe Kierkegaard?

he looks constipated

the war won't be won for a 100 years when Peter will be forgotten and Christopher will still be praised