Is this redpilled?
Worth reading?
Is this redpilled?
Colton Cook
Charles Parker
Yeah. People on this board will tell you it's no longer relevant because all of the media organisations apart from fox news are centrist or centre-left, but I think it's pretty clear that all of them support the neolib/neoconservative status quo.
Isaac Lee
Absolutely.
Actual, original implication of the term “red pill”, so you’re going to get a lot poltards telling you the opposite.
Zachary Diaz
>all of the media organisations apart from fox news are centrist or centre-left
They’re manufacturing consent to wage war with Russia, China and Venezuela. They’re neoliberals. Not “Centre left” at all
Easton Hall
Neoliberals are centre left. Liberal/left on social/environmental issues and economically capitalist. .
Levi Howard
On that political chart they’re as authoritarian blue as Castro was authoritarian red. Bernie progressives/socdems are centre-left. They believe in legislation to fix the inherent problems with capitalism and oligarchy
Easton Jenkins
>Neoliberals are centre left
>Thatcher and Raegan were center left
No.
Nathaniel Davis
Being socially liberal makes you an anti authoritarian, not a leftist. The USSR was very leftist and it discriminated against fags
Chase Garcia
>Neoliberals are centre left.
Oh dear.
Xavier Long
Neoliberals are not centre left. At least not as user is using the term and as it is generally used. "Neoliberalism" = "free market" which in reality plays out more as crony capitalism. Although I assume the term would be confusing to anyone who identifies as conservative, centrist, or even liberal as it has the word "liberal" in the term. "Neoliberal" generally has a negative connotation when used to refer to others and the speaker is signaling that they are *actually* center of left. As another user pointed out, David Harvey's A Brief History of Neoliberalism is an excellent book on this topic if you are interested.