Procreation good

What do antinatalists mean by muh suffering?

Anything.
>my mom doubt my antinatalist writings! Woe is me! If only I had never been born!
>a single passage from the bible when read out of context implies that few people will be saved! Woe is me! If only I had never been born!
>McDonalds didn't bring back the mcRib! Wow is me!
>etc
Basically they weren't bullied enought as kids so they come here trying to fill that void.

The face of antinatalism: m.youtube.com/watch?v=hcetEiNg0pg

off topic but

>>a single passage from the bible when read out of context implies that few people will be saved! Woe is me! If only I had never been born!

is true, and it's multiple passages

>birth video leaked to porn website
>humiliating lifetime for baby

Attached: 1464204290992.jpg (442x519, 21K)

Oh Jesus here We go again.
The passage litteraly says "is it True that only a few will be saved" and Jesus says (in so many words) that people that you expect will be saved will not, and other people you don't expect to be saved (from the north, the south...) WILL; so think about Saving yourself.
It's like when Jesus said "Only the Father knows the time and place of my return" and half of Christianity answered "CHALLENGE ACCEPTED".

Man This guy is just something special.

Could anybody explain why there's a recent up-tick of people advocating anti-natalism on Yea Forums? did /r9k/ kill another ethot?

Attached: 1538634608010.png (360x659, 151K)

Because We are being raided But We can't do anything about it Because free speech.

why does everybody argue from the utilitarian bullshit argument? the real argument for antinatalism is an ecological one: the planet is just better off without us, let's give a chance to the next human-like species to evolve in the future.

(1) redditors
(2) the proponents are autistic spammers

Because a vast majority of people aren't pagans? the planet doesn't care, it isn't alive.

Also how do you know the planet is better off without us?

I don't think there can be a moral imperative to procreate or not procreate, but personally, I could not bring a child into this world in good conscience.

Assuming the planet would be worse off with more people is a fallacy. You're making the mistake of taking harmful actions today and multiplying them with a growing population. Human behaviour matters more than the amount of humans. In the 70's in LA, for example, they were using unsustainable habits, but as the population grew the behaviors changed to become more sustainable

>better

without us this term has literally no meaning. We define what "better" means.

>It's like when Jesus said "Only the Father knows the time and place of my return" and half of Christianity answered "CHALLENGE ACCEPTED".

kek

>current affairs vlog puppeteer
hardcringe

Attached: 4564897978498.png (647x404, 11K)

based, no one with a big sausage thinks anti natalism is cool

That would certainly be closer to literature.

So the NPC thing is like a way to normalise bot posting, I don't get what bots and antinatalism have to do with each other.

Imagine having this damaged brain

anti-natalism is a philosophical dead, never mind a literal dead end

Attached: 1552320883377.png (900x551, 120K)

Nice strawman

>Nice strawman

Attached: 1539658254757.png (210x240, 6K)

my brain is exceptional, hence why i am not an anti-gaytalist

The comic is nonsensical, as antinatalism, correct or not, is a minority position one must come to through personal reflection or reason, while having children thoughtlessly is the norm for all humanity.

you can spawn kids with personal reflection and reason too, hell most people (especially in the west) hinge their decision on a cost benefit analysis. That's why they delay it until their 30s or 40s.

it isn't all biological imperative or accidents