O-kay... What point was this book trying to make?

O-kay... What point was this book trying to make?

Attached: Webp.net-resizeimage.jpg (1200x1600, 1.35M)

Value your humanity as one day it will be too late.

Value your dick before you stick it in sheep

according to mpc the book is about how jews are soulless npc sociopaths

OP dreams of electric dick

Should I shoot it a read OP?

>tears
>in rain

It's about lasers

lasers in the rain

None, Dick was a dick and a brainlet.
I'm happy he had a nervous breakdown. I hope he suffered.

>character is an asshole
>his name is Dick

Attached: pepe.jpg (1086x992, 73K)

1/5

Attached: pk dick1.png (607x945, 659K)

Why are you wearing shorts faghot

stop

your programming is no different than a robot's

2/5

Attached: pk dick2.jpg (614x950, 191K)

3/5

Attached: pk dick3.png (611x947, 622K)

4/5

Attached: pk dick4.png (609x923, 792K)

5/5

Attached: pk dick5.jpg (435x673, 96K)

AI will fuck us all

>TMITHC (1962) is about the dystopian world that might have been had the Nazis won WWII
>Owner of the evil megacorp in DADOES (1968) is called Rosen and his niece is named Rachael
What did Dick mean by this?

That a toad is good enough

Attached: American_Toad_8885.jpg (2896x2292, 2.45M)

A toad is fine too.

Attached: rd.like.tears.in.rain.png (329x566, 116K)

Anyone got that "It's a fine line... like a blade" parody image?

>TMITHC (1962) is about the dystopian world that might have been had the Nazis won WWII
This is entirely wrong. It's about presuming that our present world would have been exactly like it is now if we had lost - but we won and we did all of this to ourselves.

Yeah, I went into this book blind. Should have had a warning label "Caution: this book contains unrestrained schizophrenic autism"

Attached: Raving_madness.jpg (409x680, 92K)

I can't decide which cover is hideous and which is beautiful.

Attached: 216377.jpg (307x475, 33K)

Thanks I hate it

bump

That if robots can gain humanity, can ascend to possess a soul, maybe one day jews will be able to as well

Attached: ai.jpg (1280x720, 40K)

>not liking /outautist/
you don't belong here

have sex

Only bit I really like was "What about my dead cat?"
*whip out corpse

Attached: dead_cat.jpg (634x423, 118K)

He obviously puts his own identity and existence as individual at doubt. What are you? What can you tell about yourself for sure? Do you even exist as someone with paticular percieved personality?

Many. One of the main points is that the boundary between acting as if and 'being' isn't clear at all. And that being human is not a 'being' but a 'doing' to 'be' human is to be made to 'be' human. Being human requires multiple artifacts that provide humanity.

a lof of dick's works have no point per se. that's one reason they won't consider him literature. in this book, you're just exploring what life would be like if you were an android or interacting with one.

Grow a foreskin.

I could accept this as a critique for Voices from the Street. This is an absolute shit take for Androids.

Robots=bad