Humbert Humbert did nothing wrong

Humbert Humbert did nothing wrong.

Attached: 0o2a6k-dpb7I9SmnahSCEBRNG1hBvJYkNaF29B3RqwI.png (3840x2160, 2.18M)

You assume most anons have even read Lolita in the first place, OP. Hell, I'm willing to bet you haven't yourself and you, like all the others of your kind, just pretend to be all like "Humbert Humbert dindu nothing, he wuz a good boy" just to seem apart from your fellow normies, y'know, from where you came from: Reddit. You need to go back, OP.

He gave money to Lolita at the end of the story so she and her husband or whatever could "start a new life". He was a cuck at heart.

voluntary cuckoldry is the highest expression of moral feeling

He did almost everything wrong.

Thankfully Lolita died and that faggot couldn't enjoy a happy marriage lmao Humbert won at the end.

based

He definitely does some stuff wrong, but also unreliable narrator.

this
humbug was a terrible person. i think the book is interesting because it shows how middle/upper-class people rationalize manipulative behavior

No he was an artist and showed how writers manipulate and exploit language to create something beautiful, but hacks like Quilty wanted to make a cheap buck.

A narcissistic degenerate, he got what he deserved.

>You assume most anons have even read Lolita in the first place
whenever people here talk about Lolita they act as if its pornographic or soemthing so I think you're right that most of the retards here havent read it

makes me doubt like anyone here actually has read the shit they meme about

>whenever people here talk about Lolita they act as if its pornographic or soemthing so I think you're right that most of the retards here havent read it
to be fair there are some lewd passages

>Scepter of my passion
That passage is really beautifully written

>raping a 13yo for a year is "nothing wrong"
rethink life

Not gonna lie that beginning but when he almost fucks the 13 year old was pretty hot. There’s also the one where he rubs his dick on her leg to ejaculation and that bit where he fingers Lo, but that’s when it becomes more uncomfortable than hot. And also the (I can’t remember how much is implied vs. “on screen”) sexual assault drugging bits during the road trip. Don’t remember any other lewd bits, other than the ogling.

Literally everything goes wrong for everyone involved in this story. Humbert Humbert makes the worst decisions possible, even if you agree with him.

>mfw prose so purple it cant be erotic

"a cuck at heart"?!
bruh his first wife was stolen by some russian chad. whilst Humbert was helping his wife move her shit to the car, said russian chad pissed in his toilet and forgot to flush.
As far as I'm concerned, Humbert is the biggest cuck in all of literature.

Lolita was the first book I completely dropped, not because it was bad, but rather it was so good that a conjured a visceral reaction from me. The couch scene was what pushed me off the edge.

Attached: dionysus-520x1024.jpg (500x366, 26K)

He litteraly married a woman so he could fuck her daughter. He did everything wrong.

i don't think that this was what Nabokov was getting at, but each to their own

No, Quilty is the same as Humbert, or at least intellectually on the same ground we learn this from the chase. Rather Humbert lies and almost convinces us that what he is doing is different as it is for the sake of a higher art. We either realize that what he is doing is wrong because we can eventually see through his lies. For instance the line where he talks about "her sobs in the night- every night, every night- the moment I feigned sleep.”

He does say he wrote the first 2/3s or so in the style of erotica.

lolita: come for the lurid subject matter, stay for the 10/10 beautiful prose

He used too much french.

He didn't rape her.

>I leaned against the window, dying of hate and boredom

From memory, but that line killed me

Yea, it was one of those moments. I didn’t know you could write like that. Pure magic

I can't relate to him, because his rich and handsome.