Can I get all books on pros or cons of a globalized society. All of it's philosophers and critics...

Can I get all books on pros or cons of a globalized society. All of it's philosophers and critics. I am not baiting I am serious.

Attached: 1564282984150.png (489x457, 312K)

James madisons federalist Number 10 explains why diversity is a strength and why a bigger union would be less prone to fall to a tyranny of the majority. Most liberal books can be used to argue for globalism when you apply the principles in it to it or drive them to their logical conclusions actually.

Globalization is the death of diversity.

Globalization is inevitable, forget nationalism, it’s a false hope. Push for an increasingly Europeanized world. Fuck other cultures

A world government would be more diverse than the current nation-states in almost every way.

How exactly can a single thing (government or otherwise) be more “diverse” than a multitude of independent ones?

Read Carl Schmitt’s The Notion of the Political for a critique of the liberal world order. It’s a short, concise starting point.

I would then suggest Karl Polanyi’s The Great Transformation for a left-wing approach on the same topics. There are interesting parallels to be drawn with Carl Schmitt’s thought.

What do we think of karl popper?

I think we're talking past each other. A world with several nationalistic nations would indeed be more diverse overall. But each individual nation-state would govern less ethnic groups, religious groups etc than a world government would. You're basically comparing the amount of diversity in a world of nation-states. While I'm comparing the degree of diversity of a world government when compared to any individual nation-state making up a divided world. I hope i made myself clear on this.

Your world government seems completely undesirable from Madison’s position.