Real philosophy ended with Nietzsche. Anything after that is pure autistic masturbation. Prove me wrong

>Emil Cioran
>Kurt Gödel
>Karl Popper
>Ludwig Wittgenstein
Proved you wrong

>Ludwig Wittgenstein
The prime example of pure autistic masturbation
>Emil Cioran
Fair enough. But not as big as Nietzsche.

The fact that you're unable to understand Wittgenstein doesn't mean he is the problem lol

How is that possible when Nietzsche brought nothing new into philosophy

I do understand him. I just don't find him interesting or truly compelling as other actual philosophers. Plus he was a faggot.

Wrong

Attached: images (1).jpg (189x266, 8K)

>Plus he was a faggot.
I don't expect any homophobe racist /pol/tard to be smart enough to understand Wittgenstein lol
You wouldn't use your computer today if it wasn't for Alan Turing, a "faggot"

What do you have in mind when you think of philosophy? St. Augustine or Proclus? Locke or Montaigne? Berkeley or Bentham?

Someone else would have done it, science is inevitable and mediocre

Low quality bait

Computers would've been eventually invented. It's something that was in the air. There were lots of pioneers way before Turing. And disliking deviants has nothing to do with understanding anything or with inventions.

Breton ?

Anything continental and pre-20th century.

>his skepticism from Hume, Lichtenberg, Ockham
>his Greek ideas from popular ones of the day like those of Winckelmann
>his Ubermensch ends up nowhere
He was a complete failure imo

Yeah, without Newton...oh, wait Leibniz at the same time. Without Darwin...oh wait wallace

Science is discovery and duscover is for brainlets

NEET sovereigns unite!

>his Ubermensch ends up nowhere
what do you mean?

>Breton ?
God, no.

>implying real philosophy didn't end with rationalism

Attached: Eliezer Yudkowsky.jpg (280x350, 81K)

>It's something that was in the air.
lmao retarded
>And disliking deviants has nothing to do with understanding anything or with inventions.
>What's statistic
lmao braindead

Not liking contemporary philosophers is a classic brainlet tell among phil thpes -- like fiction pseuds who only read "classics".

Not an argument.

Fiction and philosophy are fundamentally different and have had a different development. Typical brainlet thinking.

Bataille

>no u
No one cares. Your thread is worthless. I just posted in the hope that the previous comment will lodge itself deep enough within your insecure mind so that you will one day overcome your brainletism.

There are literally no contemporary philosophers worth a damn. Name one, just one, or else gtfo.

The only thing relating it to the future is his presentation of it as a goal. Looking beyond the rhetoric, it’s just atheist romanticism. He failed to give it any new substantial characteristics, so it ends up just being borgia or caesar.

Kripke

>(((Kripke)))

Hes based

Jason Reza Jorjani

Nietzsche is my favorite philosopher but saying it ends with him is absolutely bait. I mean even treating this seriously for a moment Nietzsche himself recognized that his goal was to inspire future philosophers with his methods and viewpoints. Andorno, bataille, and especially foucault are all influenced by Nietzsche but are all valuable. The only one that immediately comes to mind is Derrida.

Attached: ad9dfaa115900cf98e2c8a7167307c5d.jpg (500x700, 54K)

>Nietzsche is my favorite philosopher

Attached: 1545116522507.jpg (900x760, 80K)

so you agree analytic philosophy is autistic masturbation? because that's the bottom line here

>

Attached: HappyShestov.jpg (220x333, 21K)

Of course

Attached: 18HANNIBAL3-tmagArticle.jpg (592x329, 24K)

fair enough

That isn't the bottom line here. Analytic philosophy isn't whatever comes after Nietzsche. Ever heard of continental philosophy, in which Nietzsche plays a big part of?

Ironically enough, he means more of a Foucauldian kind of point.

Explain.

You can't convince me that philosophy wasn't a tradition of mental masturbation from the start. There's a reason why Socrates was put to trial.

>There's a reason why Socrates was put to trial.
yeah, for raping your mom kek

You're going to have to overcome your brainletism on your own. Why should I give you the shibboleths?

>y-you're just a brainlet
try again faggot

care to select particular works or articles or specific arguments to illustrate what you mean about analytic philosophy? it isn't clear what you mean by autistic masturbation.

Foucault stole 98% of his ideas from Nietzsche.

He said that only to the hyperboreans, and it was more like he was telling them that they would be creating their own values because doing so is who they are and it is important to not let others get in the way of that.

All of foucault's books start with a single sentence of Nietzsche and then expanded on them into large books.