Whether you are a Marxist or a Fascist or whatever, can we all agree that Liberals get the bullet first?

It should be obvious enough to be unsaid, but if you need it spelled out for you OP, this post has absolutely nothing to do with literature.
Saged and reported.

He’s very charismatic and understands how to catch his opponents off guard. But debate as a entertainment does nothing but degrade discourse.

>complacent boomer with a status quo mentality
God, I can't wait for that generation to literally die off.

Attached: 1565981136730.png (583x482, 119K)

Holy shit I just cringed incredibly hard after I reverse-image searched OP's image and realized that he actually cares about some Twitch faggot that talks about politics. Seriously OP, go to /pol/, Yea Forums or reddit. Any true Yea Forums natives don't care about cringey Twitch 'intellectuals.'

>simple joys of life
Simple minded people will enjoy simple things

Attached: A797C7E2-AEBD-408D-B6A2-D5715A6A51A2.jpg (776x851, 107K)

I'm only opposed to liberals when it comes to social issues. Economically the free market or price coordinated distribution of resources is the most efficient method of distribution we have. Maybe some day we'll some nearly omniscient AI that can tell us how much needs to be produced and where it needs to go socialism will then be able to compete but until then I'm liberal because I enjoy not starving.

Socially I'm as authoritarian and anti-liberal as it comes. I took one of those political compass tests and it called me a clerical fascist and I think that's a good description. With the way the world currently works the only way to save it is by imposing a particular morality and religion and actively enforcing it. This is especially necessary with liberal economic policies that generates lots of wealth and lead to the cultural degeneration we see int he west.

I am far more sophisticated than you'll ever be, edgelord scum. It takes a profound mind to appreciate the simple joys of life beyond the surface value. If you are truly incapable of doing so, then why not consider suicide? If it were legal, I would gladly send you to hell.

Sure

no, first to go are statist fucks who want to be the arbiters of wrongthink

is this bait or are you actually this way user?
I really can't tell

We are all liberals and we all deserve to die.

I don't mind liberals that much, they're often well meaning. Gamers need to go though.

What kind of anarchist are you user?

transhumanist, free-market socialist

state is antithetic to free markets, capitalism is antithetic to freedom, we must evolve beyond human condition since it too makes us unfree

I think it’s the same guy who was on yesterday, bitching about some Dutch garden book. If so, he’s severely mentally ill.

>violent zoomer with a revolutionary genocidal view
You can die off, faggot. I'm not a boomer either. I'm just tired of how you faggots politicize every goddamn thing.
Slit your throat.
I am a prophet, you dumb faggot. I am far more sophisticated and educated than you'll ever be. I have beaten many people in debates here. I come with a message.

>we must evolve beyond human condition
Except It's impossible Because a system can't analize itself 100% and This can't trascend It's own limitations.

BYE BYE YOUR WORLD
HELLO MINE

>see Infinity in the simple joys of life
What joy is simpler than killing pedophiles? Uncultured Philistine

See? He’s completely fucked in the head.

>I'm not a boomer
>I am a prophet
Nah, you're a boomer.