Can we have a chart thread? Looking to get into more philophy after finishing Wittgenstien

Can we have a chart thread? Looking to get into more philophy after finishing Wittgenstien.

Attached: wittgenstein.png (1615x1676, 2.3M)

Other urls found in this thread:

mega.nz/#F!ywtXwYjC!LXU3e7knFpZK_dnHeC9ixA!m9EX3ATI
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

We can, but can charts have us?

Attached: 71974981274892.png (3340x3176, 205K)

How could you forget this

Attached: 9780394563763-uk.jpg (321x447, 25K)

Can someone post the deep ecology charts?

Charts
mega.nz/#F!ywtXwYjC!LXU3e7knFpZK_dnHeC9ixA!m9EX3ATI

Attached: 1533887228354.jpg (945x2000, 440K)

Attached: image.jpg (1208x1178, 593K)

Wittgenstein proved that all truths are a priori analytic, and that any problems or dilemmas in philosophy are the result of poor language usage.
There's no point in doing philosophy after him.
There was no point in engaging philosophy after the CPR either. Wittgenstein only helped to clear up what Kant had been too meek to state straight ahead. Before him, Hume and Leibniz had both ended up at the same conclusions as Descartes had, which are that a priori logical relations are the only true propositions, and that anything related to a posteriori knowledge is likely to be subject to dispute.
Aristotle and Plato both seemed to be aware of this, yet neither one explicitly stated this, mostly since leaving a posteriori knowledge derived from sense perception out would exclude one from being able to make any judgements about the physical world, or even more importantly, ethics.
Philosophy does not either move forward or backwards. It remains stuck with discussing the possibility of proving assumptions about assumptions.

Attached: image.jpg (1820x4348, 1.99M)

Oh please. Wittgenstein's whole schtick is poorly disguised rewording of Plato's Parmenides. He's a hack and you're even worse.

Attached: image.jpg (1820x4348, 2.16M)