Why does lit have to be all about marx?

>china world number 1 superpower from an embarassed colonized joke
>Russia went from starving backwater feudalism to superpowe
>Cuba went from America's brothel to having actual dignity and significantly increased quality of life
>all inspired by Marx

Hmmm..

i like fairy stories too

Fairy stories that have created actual existing societies.

Capital vol. 1 is just an economics textbook, retard. Try fucking reading it first.

tfw no proletarian lambo to bombard the headquarters of those pesky 'HK prodemocracy protestors' aka fascists with the truth of marxism leninism maoism xi jinping thought.

Attached: Screen Shot 2019-08-28 at 6.42.03 PM.png (469x554, 371K)

I like to read Marx, Bordiga and Debord for their invective erudition and comfy dialectical turns of phrase, but in the end I remain convinced that free market capitalism and globalisation are not only compatible but a prerrequisite for intersectional social justice

Former existing societies.

It's an economic textbook full of falsehoods, like his theory of value.

Going bankrupt in the 80s/90s and starting a massive reduction of government size and red tape is pretty based, yes.

communism is the most individualistic ideology in existence!

>free market
lmao sick bait

>Former existing societies.
One existing society.

I can guarantee that you have no actual understanding or critque of the theory of value. Mostly because you're criticizing his work without reading it.

>tree
this fruit still thinks in "tree" way lmao

Attached: Deleuze-and-his-cat.jpg (900x1001, 109K)

>a tree is known by its fruits and his fruits stink
No, why don't you go outside and try to identify some trees? Also, this means you are either a prolifer or okay with infanticide.

Fpbp
Nobody gives a shit about materialist dialectics until they get called out for being honkies

I read his formulas. I don't need to read all his sophistry for pseuds. His formulas are wrong. Modern economists don't take him seriously, not even the progressive ones. Only sociologists and such dwell in his sophistry.

I can smell the burgers in this thread.

Attached: 1563573649568.jpg (763x809, 59K)

Is this the Yea Forums version of twitter moms that claim only frat bros like socialism?

Attached: white_people.png (1104x245, 28K)

China is not Marxist. Only the corpse remains. The ruling faction within the party is nationalist, capitalist, supremacist and xenophobic.

>China
>communist

>Hong Kong
>not petite-bourgie bullshit with imperialists waving burger flags

The only reason it's supported so much is because Americans are stupid and will do anything against China.

Honestly I’m no botanist but there must be better ways to identify a tree.

You must know the average age of users on this Djiboutian basket weaving enthusiasts forum

Young hurt people looking for answers believe the same lies that he advocates when he first wrote it. He removes any semblance of greater purpose from the human soul, it’s playing Zerg to them, humans can be pruned and “removed” as passionately filled with zeal as a woman removing hairs on her brow as she drives to work.

He was a Godless Zionist yet people can’t look at history books, I know they like to think his shit don’t stank but lean a little bit closer and realize that hammer and sickle smells ooowooowoo.

A Godless system of governance follows the same trends as we look back on the past but of the modern world.

Communism cares as much about human lives as abundantly as Gregor Samsa‘s self esteem.

Attached: 096D1ECD-BB29-4238-9052-16143F051A05.jpg (499x425, 33K)

What are some capitalism-critisicm without marxism?

fascism, progressivism

Both Capitalism.

Def. capitalism: An economic system in which the means of production and distribution are privately or corporately owned and development occurs through the accumulation and reinvestment of profits gained in a free market.

>profits gained in a free market.

>fascism
>free market

>progressivism
>free market

Didn't know the market wasn't free with mussolini, franco or hitler.

These are all stalinist states. Stalinism is Leninism taken to its brutalist, oppressive and democidal extreme. Leninism itself is just a blanquist retinkering of Marxism, but one must fault Marxism for paving the way towards a vanguardist takeover of its ideals. Still, theoretically there should be no professionalization of the revolution, nor should it become bureaucratized. It is a shame that an ideology with such revolutionary potential would be co-opted by glorified gangsters and psychopaths.

>Still, theoretically there should be no professionalization of the revolution, nor should it become bureaucratized.
This.

>like, dudes, we gotta hold off on that revolution bros. cause the materialist conditions gotta be just right! Look, just stop trying to challenge the powers that be alright!?

Attached: 1509816764933.png (558x614, 24K)

>a tree is known by its fruits
yikes

Botanist here, they are known by their flowers.

>jerking off to countries with shitty quality of life
Correlation does not mean causation and I doubt you can logically attribute any of those successes to Marx. Prove me wrong.

Attached: CF06498A-2AF9-4599-A779-F5562F8FBE6A.png (2000x2000, 1.21M)