Hey pseuds and LARPers of Yea Forums. I just wasted 2 hours writing and researching pic related

Hey pseuds and LARPers of Yea Forums. I just wasted 2 hours writing and researching pic related.
Rate.

Attached: nick land guide for lit LARPing pseuds.jpg (1900x4750, 1.4M)

I like it a lot!

This post gave me such complex emotions

20% I want to make fun of you for 15+ different things in that picture
20% It's so bad that I assume you actually must be joking/trolling
20% When I then allow myself to think "oh my god, what if he ISN'T joking/trolling though?," I feel genuine pity for you, and suddenly want to save you from whatever dilettantism black hole you've fallen into
20% Praying that you're just underage and full of enthusiasm, and you'll get yourself out of the black hole eventually
20% Feeling bad for pointing and laughing at a possible underagefag, whose youthful enthusiasm is simply manifesting in naivete, when I was probably (?) this bad at some point

Then I loop around to the beginning and start over like a kaleidoscope of psychic pain unfolding before my eyes

Attached: ootm.jpg (500x573, 37K)

You people are so weird. Land is an ancap. Just read Hoppe and Rothbard and you're ready to go.

>namefaging on a chart

Attached: 1526899480326.png (760x429, 316K)

Make fun of him please.

Tell why it sucks!

kant?

i liked it

holy fucking shit that's bad

Meth eats your brain

Ah yes, I remember as if it were yesterday the moment when I released my 'research' in the form of a 'So you want to understand Richard Dawkins' chart... Everyone has their own edgy chart to make.
If OP is a bait and a joke, it's masterful. If it's serious, then it will make for some nice laughs for when the OP grows up.

Attached: 9666B07A1DD0438892526D3F587D628C.jpg (673x842, 33K)

Find a new website you old fucks

>a fucking namefag

ABCs of Communism isn't even pamphelt-tier. It's like a retarded children's book "A is for X," "B is Y," etc. It's a nothing contribution to communist lit that only gets mentioned because a significant figure, Bukharin, wrote it who is otherwise unrepresented in the commie cannon. It's bad agitprop for its time, nothing more.

Honestly, whether this is a troll or a sincere individual, I nevertheless agree with your Avoid/Cope selections.

not gpood

The fuck? Where’s Bataille or Deleuze?

There are literally 4 books by Deleuze there.

it's pronounced deleuze

Holy shit you ate the whole bunch of pills.

>By Lucas
Not even mad.

Attached: 1566953686385.jpg (1121x1004, 92K)

This is what happens when you try to make a chart without having read the books on it.

Attached: 1543785530969.jpg (870x455, 33K)

please explain!!!!

i feel this way about the charts i am informed to criticize (mostly stemautism ones), but this one is over my head and i cant tell whats wrong with it.

its like theyre made by bare initiates who learned one thing and then think they have a grand birds eye vision when actually they are only revealing themselves as charlatans to anyone who knows just a tiny amount more than they do

To be fair 99% of the recommendation charts on this board are bullshit and it's blatantly obvious that people haven't read half of the ahit they are recommending.
So this chart isnt that much worse in that regard. Could have at least make it a little bit more funny with fast memes.
>Lucas
That's pretty embarrassing though

No, You esecrable failed abortion. You go back to r/books, We were there before You and shall be here when You're But a bad memory.

I'm ready, where do I start with Land? Very interested in that whole 'theory fiction' shtick

>bad memory
>dying first
Lmao