Any good conservative, right wing books about saving Western Civilization from Islam? Novels welcome too

Kill all non whites problem solved

my God

Israel needs to be stopped.

Attached: PalestineIsraelMap580.jpg (580x386, 57K)

Based, they're making the sniper's job even easier.

Honestly, it's the arab fault at this point, they had three attempt to genocide Israel with overwhelming force and completly failed every time. Look like Allah is on the jew's side.

>Hasn't heard about the prosperity gospel

I find it extremely bizarre that the same people upset about Conservative values being withered away, about LGBT issues, etc- take up such issue with Islam, which by all accounts seems to be in line with your very beliefs.

>prosperity gospel
protestant degeneracy truly knows no bounds

but islam is the real homophobes and the real antisemitism just like democrats are the real racists. the problem is regressive leftists like yourself who can't stand being owned by their own logic.

Submission. Although it shows that Islam will merge with western civilization.

'western civilisation' is a codeword for zionism and homosex

You may find this series of articles insightful on the cognitive dissonance of the right.

arktos.com/2019/04/26/islamophobia-trojan-horse-amidst-the-right/

DON Quixote

Attached: IMG_0467.jpg (1024x682, 103K)

IMPERIUM, by Francis Parker Yockey

No other option compares.

Attached: 0B7A7915-7852-4FAA-AF0F-AC3C7ED56B95.jpg (339x499, 46K)

Islam isn't conservative, it's third-worldist. You don't understand, the whole nature of their society is backwards; not a single element of the periodic table, nor a single modern medical breakthrough, nor any recent great work of art comes from Arabia. The fallacy of your argument lies in the fact that 19th century Western society, or even medieval Western society, is very distinct from Islamic society.

Attached: Cousin Marriage.png (599x463, 140K)

>Submission. Although it shows that Islam will merge with western civilization.

I think it was supposed to be a criticism of deranged leftists who praise worshippers of pedophilic war mongers.

Muh islamic golden age muh saviors of antiquity muh astrolabe

Abstract beliefs aren't the problem, concrete ethnic replacement is. If your city has Muslim enclaves you will know what the issue is.

>Implying that the shitskins of today have anything to do with the arabs of the Golden Age

Kek

This. The problem is, it's so aggressive that it leaves non-muslims with no choice but to eradicate it completely ( and anger other muslims in the process ) or be conquered by it ( obviously bad). There's no middle way. Zero tolerance begets zero tolerance.

What Went Wrong by Bernard Lewis. Ignore the rest.
>Novels welcome too
Do not accept novels. Treat your entry into the subject fairly.

Mayhaps 1985 by Anthony Burgess

have you seen the fucking state of muslim countries?

Hitler figured it out years ago that assimilating the core values of Islam while simultaneously kicking out the arabs and filtering out the bad elements would be an alternative to the West. I can understand mainstream conservatives not liking it but it surprises me how many people on the far right forgot that Christianity at the end of the day, isnt going to do jack shit against the current status of the world.

based, you can't be right wing without also being anti-american

Muslims are Christians on steroids

>And, in a moment of clarity, user realized that the one post he had read a few days ago, in which another user argued that it was society's obligation to throw fags off rooftops, was actually parody.

based and quoitpilled

Attached: 169C3725-D8ED-4E10-A686-C5105EDF012F.jpg (750x522, 95K)

Go back to /pol/, you fucking faggots. Yes, Islam sucks but stop making every single thing racial. Also, Middle Easterners are still fucking Caucasoids and share a lot of ancestry in common with Europeans, enough to be adjacent with them. Your beloved Asians are way more genetically distant than Middle Easterners. Moreover, I doubt most of you even read any literature.

Attached: genetic_reality_race.jpg (572x532, 43K)

>Islam isn't conservative
>the whole nature of their society is backwards
The pot calling the kettle black.

Conservative values aren't exactly Islamic values, there's a world of difference in their respective approaches to modernity. The radical Islam isn't conservative at all, it's very much an iconoclastic fever dream which is much closer to the revolutionary politics of the 20th century both in practice and in it's treatment of the normative ethics.

Then there's the fact that christian conservatives generally view them as a competing camp.

Attached: 14c.jpg (1148x1194, 375K)

Muslims vote for left parties that reinforce those those tendencies though. Of course Muslims do so in a purely tactical manner, when they reach a critical mass you'll have "Muslim" parties (of course it will be a pale imitation of Islam) that will wield power. Also they're allowed to hold those beliefs because they're seen as being somewhere between backwards inferiors due to oppressive Crusaders, and not even people at all, but merely props in a morality play. If a white person held the same beliefs they'd be socially ostracized.

So, he's not Jewish then?

>Moreover, I doubt most of you even read any literature.

This is a low blow.

Anti-Americanism isn't going far enough. Liberalism is encoded into the English language. One has to be against the English-speaking peoples themselves.

elaborate

you’re writing in english rn dude

christianity is a sect of judaism, especially protestants who place such an emphasis on scripture

Take a look at English: Meaning and Culture to start. It's not obvious at first but you can see how liberal principles (respect for others' "autonomy", individualism, etc.) have seeped into English itself. For example, when we say "Could you do X", you don't want to be seen as commanding someone to do X, because that would be infringing upon their autonomy.

aren't dilbertman's scifi books about glassing the middle east or something

I know, that's the tragedy of history isn't it? It's unfortunate that English-speakers grabbed North America, and the radical Puritan ones at that.

but I say "Do x"

Also another one is that the concept of "fairness" doesn't translate well to non-English languages, there's also a bit on the concept of "Right" in English and how it's come to imply a procedural approach to ethics. I'm still going down the rabbit hole with this stuff to be honest. But in general the more you move out of the liberal mindset the more you notice the evils of Englishmen.

Living rent free

amazon.it/rage-pride-Oriana-Fallaci/dp/8817871923

I feel like a slave. I am not living rent free.

And I thought lefties quoting shit like this to discredit conservatives was a strawman

Because they are racists, plain and simple. They are either too blinded by their hatred of minorities or they just cannot bear to admit Islam shares every single one of their views.

This. They don't want to admit that they're monsters just like Muslim extremists.

That was a well good read, thanks user

Modern conservatives are Trotskysts, "conservative" as to imply the american conservative movement + right wing = mutually exclusive concepts.
It's either Throne and Altar Patchwork neo-Holy-Roman-Empire contitutional monarchy with genetically modified "nobles" or burst.

I thought 100% he would be long Boss tribe. Irrelevant He's still a cultural trotskyst.

>the "cure" is actually pure dhiarroeic shit right into the "patient's" bloodstream.
If the West is decadent Islam has been since the early '1000s and degenerate to pure tribal death cult territory. The only sane muslims are indonesians and oceanians who don't give a fuck about actual theology and freely worship their traditional Gods on the side.
Sufis are fucking demon worshippers. ISIS should have murdered more.

>TU QUOQUE TU QUOQUE TU QUOQUE
The one and only antichristian argument, friends.
May the Lord our God give me to slaughter you in Holy Crusade.

If anything we should be discussing how to save Islam from "Western Civilization". You are drowning in narcissim covered by so called individualism, and you think that worldly pleasures makes your limited time here worthwile. The downfall of the west is inevitable, you sold your souls and family values to corporations and the eternal jew.

Attached: 6969156c5975.jpg (1518x2048, 597K)

Being anti-LGBT is just basic sanity and hygiene common to all (sane) mankind, it has nothing whatsoever to do with beliefs.

>You're drowing in narcisismo and edonism
Though talk from someone who fucked kids and smoked opium for 1500 years before anyone told him there was anything wrong with it.

>prosperity gospel
>it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God

Litteraly calvinist heresy.

Rich in Spirit not necessarily in actual wealth. You're right that prosperity gospel is heresy but not for This reason.

Look what it has lead to, look at what the islamic world has become - this is your future.

I'm agreeing with you simpleton, I was being sarcastic because i find It humorous that the same guys amongst which opium consumption is a fuvking beloved Tradition would call anyone else degenerate and hedonistic.

I hate the phrase western civilisation, it sounds so dorky

This.
>"It's just a matter of beliefs! If niggers and mudslides just read John Locke and J.B. Peterson, they'd be just like me!"

>Any good conservative, right wing books about-
No.

It's Islam that needs to be saved from Western Civilization.

Attached: l.jpg (1177x555, 221K)

Henri Pirenne Mohammad and Charlemagne

>literal heresy
Repent

There are a few typical reasons.

1. Simple us vs. them tribalism that has its origin in 9/11. No long common, but was the most likely reason back in the aughts. Sometimes slides into reason 2.

2. Anti-immigration people want to not be called racist for being against immigration. To do so, they say they are against an ideology, not a race. They are trying to make their position fit into a nominally left/liberal framework. (They probably are at least subconsciously racist, but they've been taught that racism is the greatest evil and thus cannot admit to being racist.) Either they are doing so dishonestly (ie they are actually racist and are just finding a work-around) or subconsciously (they don't realize the actually reason for their opposition to immigration, or lied to themselves about why they oppose it until they believed it). This probably explains your average peoples best.

3. They were never socially conservative in the first place, and were just pretending to be that way to secure votes/views/whatever. This is rather common too, especially among actual politicians and alt-light media personalities.

4. You confused a libertarian for a social conservative because they were in the same party for economic reasons.

5. They just don't want them in since they vote for left-wing parties and thus don't help social conservatives win any political victories.

6. Least common, they're actual hardcore ideologues about Christianity and view them as heretics, or some sort of ideologue about classical liberalism and see Islam as unreconcilable. Mostly I think these are people who started with a more base motivation (#2 generally) and rationalized to make it palatable, but some people are convinced.

Lmao I hope you didn't actually read the book before coming to this idiotic conclusion.

Constitutional? I think you made a mistake user.

Attached: 1553373966710.png (904x882, 914K)

Islam is the key to saving the west. Sage in all fields you kike shill

seething whitoid

Probably an ethnic jew, but christian by faith.

Islam and the west are mutually exclusive and opposed systems of aesthetics .

The west is not a system of aesthetics

Right wing politics are about the aesthetic composition of society rather than social organization or the allotment of rights various groups. That alone makes western conservatism and Islam are fundamentally incompatible while Islam and any form of leftism isn’t.

this poster is an idiot

I'd rather have Islam take over the world and me living as a dhimmi than drag kids being a thing

All civilizations are systems of aesthetics embraced by groups as a result of historical conditions.

Social organization and other material factors determine the aesthetic composition of society, though. I mean, why wouldn't they? Artists and people that produce or maintain objects with aesthetic quality are members of society so naturally what they choose to do is greatly determined by their place in society. Moreover, material factors such as the enabling of mass reproduction of art on an industrial scale has greatly effected our aesthetic experience of it as documented by Walter Benjamin among others.