Which movement was right?

Daily. Can’t remember the last time I had to go more than a day without.

Attached: 777D1001-5B4F-4862-ABA6-AE1C9B3F1D4B.jpg (962x948, 182K)

>Empiricism
5/10
>Existentialism
5/10
>German idealism
2/10
>Logicism
6/10
>Logical Positivism
2/10, perversion of the above
>Marxism
1/10
>Phenomenology
10/10
>Poststructuralism
3/10
>Pragmatism
7/10 and I'm actually butthurt having to admit it isn't bad
>Rationalism
9/10, becomes a 10 with phenomenology
>Structuralism
7/10
>Utilitarianism
0/10

>immediately equates happiness and pleasure
You're hedonist alright.

whys there no line from aristotle to plotinus

Critical rationalism

zeno was a pupil of crates and crates was a pupil of diogenes and diogenes was a pupil of antisthenes and antisthenes was a pupil of socrates, not aristotle. this chart sucks

Attached: カフェ・ベローチェ「#飛鳥休憩中」読書篇 乃木坂46 齋藤飛鳥-CkfsWH3WRdU-[0 (1280x720, 2.74M)

>'Bout to get nuked
Aristole, Aquinas, Nietzsche, Stirner, Rand.
Metaphysics- you exist in a world that you can interact with.
Epistemology- correspondence to "the real" is irrelevant. You exist in a world that you can interact with, epistemic value is what bridges the gap between your mind, and what you can exert in the world.
Ethics- you exist. Your goal is inevitably to live the best life possible. If you're above a midwit, that means setting goals and embracing the meaning that comes with struggling to achieve your desires. Just like a book or tv show, it's only worth experiencing when the characters are working towards a goal. The goal itself is being, the struggle is what is meaningful.
>sorry for the boomer length of this post.

also skepticism came from pyrrho, not from aristotle

>categorizing movements like that is peak analytical philosophy pseudery

Why do you post on an account and not as an user? Not criticizing, genuinely curious.