>due diligence
Shit midwits say
Other urls found in this thread:
nature.com
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
>thither to
>Mom, Dad, I want to get an English Major.
>he's done his homework
this
Hahaha does someone have the full of op pic with the 140iq and 90iq pepe shaking hands
>cites the dunning kruger effect without a hint of self-awareness
Time to see what the real smart people like here. Post
>SAT score out of 1600
>favorite book
>1440
>Robinson Crusoe
SAT isn't a sign of anything. It can indicate intelligence but it isn't proof of it. Even blacks can get a perfect SAT score. The fact that you view it as a valid metric is proof that you're a midwit. Probably a neurotic midwit at that given that you put probably put a lot of time and preparation into it.
Thank you user
I took it out of 2400 but if you remove the writing component then I scored like 1580.
Probably Crime and Punishment
Its better than and more standardized than online iq tests though, and almost everyone has taken the SAT. I’m tired of online iq test LARPers
>online iq tests
Those were never valid in the first place. The fact that you thought they remotely indicated anything is even more proof that you are a midwit.
Notes in my country run from 1 to 6, with 1 being the best. Got 2,1. Out of 140 other pupils in my year, only 15 got a better grade.
Complete Chronicles of Conan.
>1560
>Sound and the Fury
Still trying to capture Faulkner's prose and work it into my own writing style.
I never said that, but if I ask for iq people will post what they got on an online test invariably.
>time to see what the real smart people are here
>SAT scores performance correlates strongly with being a midwit
>midwit appears disparately trying to 'prove' his intelligence
>1600
>The Bible
>Remembering your SAT score.
I honestly couldn't tell you anymore. It's been too long and nobody cares besides high school students.
Why do you care? It's because you're a midwit desperately trying to prove his self-perceived intelligence
t. midwit
midwits are precisely the kind of people that point to their SAT scores and bring it up along with their laundry list of "accomplishments".
I don't need to feign my intelligence. I'll readily tell you I never graduated from college, that I struggled with trigonometry in higher math, and I need to look up words when I read classic literature.
Me in the corner
>i fucking LOVE science
doo dilidoo
i don't get it, must be super high iq meme
>cite your sources
>midwit
(not me tho i got a huge sexy wrinkle brain)
fuck I'm 121 (it was internet test tho, so I can be even dumber)
how to live?
>”it begs the question”
>it actually is just raising the question
> 1488
> Mein Kampf
>he walks the walk
95 and 110 are both within a standard deviation of average
>ugh, philosophy is outdated. We have science now
These tests are no indication of your actual iq. I got a result that said my iq was somewhere between 121 and 137 and I'm retarded.
i thought you were slighty above average with a iq between 110 and 120.
The SD is 15 so 115 is below and above average respectively
>I'm sapiosexual
I say due diligence all the time because I have to perform due diligence as part of my job
Exactly.
>whataboutism
the average iq of Yea Forums is 121. Lower when redditors and Yea Forums posters came here.
>1430
>Notes from the Undergrund
>No true Scotsman
>straw man
this
>idr except that i got a 790 on writing, didn't go to college anyway so it doesn't matter
>beyond good and evil
>semiotic
>bundle of cells
>it's just a piece of cloth (still has a fit when he sees le slaver
's saltire)
>SAT
>indication of intelligence
hope you're larping as a midwit
Fuck, I botched that. This is why you shouldn't phonefag.
1590
changes a lot, right now it’s Ada
also i was really hungover and only got three hours of sleep so i probably would have gotten a perfect score with better conditions. also i napped during the test
y tho
Trying to hard to dismiss everything as a fallacy, like yelling NO TRUE SCOTSMAN! or whatever every time someone says something slightly unclear, like they think every conversation is supposed to be a high-speed 'gotcha' Youtube debate
Namedropping DK is just "you're a stupid dummy" for redditors
>semiotextual
First is definitely midwit. Second can be midwit if used improperly.
It's well thought out bait.
It's not bait. I sincerely believe it
Hey man delete this
That's why it's so good, the best bait is that which feeds into the self consciousness of the viewer. Manlet memes are the same.
i look at it i laugh, then i realize i don't know why and i can't figure it out but it's still funny
i assumed it was showing the dunning-kruger thing
the dumb people know they're dumb so they're humble, same with the really smart people
it's the ones in the middle that are always annoying
that's it i was thinking of the specific numbers too much
iq doesn't measure anything except your performance on iq tests
"like racing on a race track and using that to gauge performance on off-road uneven terrain"
for sub 90 IQ people, their IQ quite accurately predicts their uselessness
but above say 110 IQ, there is no correlation between IQ and life outcome
1450
It’s a close tie between 100 Years of Solitude and House of Leaves
>33 on ACT, never took SAT
>The Souls of Yellow Folk by Wesley Yang
my real estate agent uses this term.
1133/1600 but I was out of school for 6 years which I didn't graduate from and studied twice
Why do you say completely untrue shit, if you researched this stuff for like 5 minutes you'd know that the correlation between IQ and life outcomes is far more robust than what you're saying. There are domains where the average IQ of the people employed is like 150. There is also a clear correlation with wealth up to about 130.
And taipan or anything by James clavell
Stands in your path nature.com
yeah right
this. you just outed yourself as a college freshman
T. Never read the bible
>There is also a clear correlation with wealth up to about 130.
wet pavement causes rain
ACT is the better test.
Based halfwit.
>1230
Anything by Sam Harris
>Because of how we evolved (insert whatever point they want to make about human nature)
>... and pound her ass into oblivion.
>Live and let live
>Are you aware of the regulation
All rich people have high IQ (talking about the "self-made").
But all Geniuses have often psychological issues.
Not all with high IQ are rich.
>I only read helpful books
>That's not *literature*
>I am an intellectual
>Think about the children
Any overused trite phrases.
>In this day and age
>Throughout history
>adding insult to injury
>blood sweat and tears
>bone to pick
>come hell or high water
>crack of dawn
There's thousands. They're okay to use for dialog though, because regular people do say those things.
Although there's one there that I sort of like
>Throughout history
I like the idea of starting every essay (regardless of topic) with the dawn of man and working from there to piss off English TAs.
>Do you have a source for that point?
hard disagree. at least in terms of reasoning ability
Japan is a country retard
>username checks out
>because of the way it is
>have an upboat
>banana for scale
>send nudes
>EDIT: thanks for gold kind stranger
>I NOPED outta there!
>Nobody:
>First off: Ew
>You. I like you.
>You sir, are a gentleman and a scholar.
>I know. Isn't it just achingly wonderful?
>On this day, OP delivered
>That escalated quickly
>EDIT: downvotes, really?
>can i have that link for uhhhh research purposes?
>sigh... *unzips dick*
>RIP Inbox
>Well played, sir. Well played.
>You made me spit out my coffee.
>You deserve more upvotes.
>Are you me??
>This will probably get downvoted but
>Does anybody else...
>Edit: words
>Whoosh
>Whelp
Is there a word for what people do when they confuse science for the thing it studies?
>methinks
Pretentious reddit word.
I dunno but anthimeria pisses me off
>I'm going to SCIENCE the shit out of this
>modernity sucks!
>capitalism kills culture
>im against international finance, not international jewry
>psychology is a scam
>i have alternative thinking
>socialism will fix climate change!
>utopia is possible
midwit is a little generous. although admittedly Yea Forums has its own brand of subhumans
You really need to stop posting in humor threads
Based >95 iq poster
Why do they all write the same way?
smart enough to know there is something better, too stupid to get there.
The site is designed to encourage social conformity
Yea Forums does too, but not to the same extent.
HPD
>but I digress
In America only the successful writer is important, in France all writersare important, in England no writer is important, and in Australia youhave to explain what a writer is.
that you in the spotlight, losing your religion?
We have no SAT, but in Finland we have a matriculation exam where the best grade is Laudatur, the Eximia and so on. Only 5% receive a Laudatur in a given subject, and most only do four subjects in total. Me? I had 8 laudaturs and 2 eximias.
Favourite book is Autumn of the Patriarch.
This is spot on.
Bananas are seldom the same length even though they are clones essentially. Growing conditions vary by batch. Banana for scale is just a phallic symbol, further indicating Reddit's homosexual and cumbrain tendencies.
>everything you need to know is in a book
Last time it was 130+, is this going to be the next penis chart? Also czech'd
>is this going to be the next penis chart
Isn't it already?
Why would you know all this shit you fucking redditor, go back this isn't some kind of New Reddit
Just a reminder
>All rich people have high IQ
You forgot /his/
if you're getting that from some data mining thread it's probably inflated
or are you just guessing? Just curious about that number
>tfw when office group meeting with the boss
>somehow a topic comes up related to dunning kruger effect
>I mention dunning kruger effect and explain what it is
>everyone in the office thinks im a genius because I know the term "dunning-kruger effect"
>no one actually remembers what it is but they all know me know as the guy who knows complicated science shit
>i don't actually know jack shit about science
lmao how the fuck did they even recruit for this "study"
>eat the rich
I took an IQ test and the results came back in the 180s. The issue now is that I feel that I can't mention it to anyone without looking like I'm bragging.
I was so relived when mine came back negative.
>negative
huh?
>All rich people have high IQ (talking about the "self-made").
Average to middle range IQ you surely mean.
Bullshit. Are you really trying to convince me that 180s have nothing better to do than shitpost on a Cambodian antique glass blowing site?
t. 140IQ (no I don’t have anything better to do, before you ask)
It must suck having English as a second language.
ironically enough, your story encapsulates an anti-dunning-kruger-effect: idiots know they're idiots because of others, an average guy knows he's average because of self-reflection.
>350
>Gravity's Rainbow
>Tits > Ass
Obviously.
From left to right
marry, kill, fuck
Also correct opinion
Guter Mann
In my book a German has to add to his final mark his Bundesland and his year of graduation (A "very good" in Saxonia in 2018 is like a "only pleasing" in Bavaria of 2008. Just sayin.)
This desu
took it when it was out of 2400
>1470
>East of Eden
Cumbrains are the biggest midwits.
-
.145 IQ people know its ephemeral, does not last, and competes against other goals and interest in life. They see the inherent disconnect between it and the intellect.
>muh religion is for midwits LOL based atheists
Lol
This guy had a low sat score
>1080 the first time
>1570 the second time
Confederacy of Dunces
I raised my score by over 200 points after three weeks of studying. SAT doesnt mean anything close to IQ
Mom, Dad, I want to go to law school.
Maybe stop using fallacies in your reasoning
You can also easily increase your IQ by taking a second IQ test. Practice misses the point since it's cheating.
The SAT score most indicative of your intelligence is the first one.
fuck off ameriblorbs, Yea Forums is an european board
1490
Nuclear weapons and foreign policy by Kissinger
Not sure how accurate IQ or SAT test results would be for people here as a statistic considering the sleep deprivation, depression, and anxiety/test anxiety rates. Those factors can be truly damning to your cognition, of course the administrator is there to rule that out, but mine just asked after to report, alongside the number, those factors as a confounding variable.
I've never taken SAT, but I really loved De Rerum Natura, regardless.
Semiotics is too niche for midwits though
Just an anecdote that doesn't mean shit, but I'm 134 and routinely feel like a clueless idiot compared to some people posting here.
got a 760 on eng and 550 on math the admissions officer said they've never seen such a disparity. what is wrong with my brain bros
>slippery slope fallacy or citing whatever reddit-fallacy-of-the-month kick the site is on
>strawman
>nameless "experts" / "scientists"
>pseudo-intellectual
also getting huffy about anecdotes
okay, but psychology really is the 2nd shittiest science. just behind scatology
Brainlets are religious
Intelligent people can be religious
Midwits were the agnostic/atheistic/materialists in this scenario, brainlet.
Thinking they're big brained by saying shit like
>ENLIGHTENED CENTRISM
left-wing reddit radicals are annoying in general.
anything slightly critical of radical beliefs gets chided as "horseshoe theory" or some other dumb, parroted talking point.
>tfw I wanted to get the hell out of the SAT testing facility and hated the proctor (and she hated me) and just sped through everything and left
>Rigor in argumentation is for the stupid.
sounds like that could be another fallacy; let me thumb through wikipedia to prove your post meaningless
the real question that should go along with these scores is how much preparation was done? i always wonder how well i would've done if i'd studied at all, but i didn't and got 1330.
Don't strawman him, bro. It's possible that he cares about good argumentation (false dichotomy, heheh) without being overly fixated on fallacies.
Being overly concerned with fallacies is just a fallacy fallacy, bro. Check out this link: en.wikipedia.org
>scatology
>stupid
you fucking troglodyte
>"Hurr i dont have to argue with you, because you argue in bad faith".
Mostly said by radical leftists. I'd say that the far right tend to be more either full-blown morons rather than midwits, while liberals and the far left has way more midwits. Midwits are far more infuriating, since they tend to know much less than they think.
lel
>this is objectively bad
Based on what
>UGH JUST BECAUSE IT IS
You have no clue how many times people give me this then go on to say that gay sex is okay becuase morals are objective
full-blown morons are funnier and more entertaining as well. I'd rather laugh at retarded turbo-racists than listen to any keyboard justice warrior.
Where do I take the SAT?
best post
labeling informal arguments you don't like 'fallacies' in contrast to the informal arguments you do like doesn't mean anything.
>implying I took the sat spook evaluator
>the script of Raimi's spiderman 2
You are all psueds
>1500
>No Longer Human
I know it’s cringe, but I’m not going to lie to myself and say I don’t like it a lot
>Semieotic
this