To the Internet Marxists of Yea Forums:

To the Internet Marxists of Yea Forums:

Explain to me how people will somehow organize from the ground up without any kind of hierarchy

Explain why the capitalist and mixed systems of today which are robust and adapt to daily changes should be replaces by your IDEAL/FANTASY of socialism which there are no real examples of working.

Explain how workers are being exploited or how they are slaves or how the systen is predatory when they literally agree with the employer what their wage will be. Also dont go on about demonizing the CEOs saying they shouldnt be making what they are as it takes much more skill and risk to run the entire enterprise and they also invested their starting capital in the company. If it was as easy as sitting somewhere and twiddling your thumbs having your workers make all the profit for you then the worker would be running the business himself. Management is a skill in itself which carries far greater risks. If the CEO mismanages a company, he is putting the entire value of the company on the line. If a worker makes a mistake, the cost to that mistake is localized. Just because someone is sitting in an office chair and not doing manual labor doesn't mean he isn't doing any work. What a worker generates would be worthless if that infrastructure hadn't been invested before he was even able to work.

Attached: 1561619369519.jpg (720x1280, 178K)

explain why yer seething so hard, bitch.

This is a literature board. Go back to /pol/.

this isn't reddit.com

No one is going to read this shit, fuck off faggot

Milky tits

That last paragraph is literally an autistic rant. Is the job of a ceo hundreds or thousand times more difficult than a regular employee, if that is your argument for difference in wages?

Amerimutt detected

you sound like me when I was in my first year of my business degree, please don't sound like me when I was in my first year of my business degree.

these are all easily answered, and some quick googling and even (gasp!) reading will do the trick

leftists have been talking about these things for over a century and a half

amazingly, they have also thought about why people believe just the sort of things (i.e. ideology) that you do!

Literally no argumente here very curious ^_^

fpbp

>2019
>depending on “the people”

This is why I read. You see fiction, it’s the only way to do a proper analysis of human beings. Great fiction, like great authors, recognize the complexities of human beings and their troubles, nurture vs nature, time and place, but most importantly, narratives. Your providing a narraative yourself, just like a good little NPC. The cringe sets in when we come to realize you are being 100% honest, you really believe the shit your saying in this post. I’m so sorry but this is a book we’ve read before, and it’s boring and corny and lame

>Internet Marxists
Why would you argue with "2+2=5"ists?

Just because someone is able to provide a 10.000 word answer to every argument that 2 + 2 isn't 5, why would you care or even debate him.
If he writes about how "You do not understand numbers" or "The meaning of + is really not what you have been taught", why would you care?
There is no real debate to be had, you can explain him for hours what the meaning of 2 is, how you define + and 2 mathematically, but in the end, if someone truly believes that "2+2=5", why would you try to debate him?

Care to refute any of the points made or are you just going to be a pseud?

>without any kind of hierarchy
>t. lobster
read Marx faggot
didn't read the rest of your cope

>without any kind of hierarchy
stopped right there, you are talking about anarcho-communism and not marxism

>when they literally agree with their employer what their wages will be
Yes that is right that is what workers have to subject themselves to. Your naivety sees this as workers actually having any freedom of choice but this is not the case. Read up on societies of control. And workplaces work fine when they are democratized there are real world examples of this.

My guy, anarcho-communism is a fucking redundant term. Marx described pure communism as a society with the absense of government and social class.

>And workplaces work fine when they are democratized there are real world examples of this.
Nothing which has been "democratized" ever worked "well" beyond pure chance.

M

O

.M

..M

Y

Y

What is the psychological significance of the "mommy" meme in the modern collective unconscious? Is today's man incapable of even fantasying his libido being satisfied outside of a passive and infantile state?

I’d rather not rehearse this debate

co-ops produce a third if italy's gdp

If you have nothing of substance to say then dont post anything pseud

You think what you are doing is substantial enough to be considered intelligent? Lol go ahead kid

we don't have a free market
note a free market doesn't have to be "capitalist"

t. market "Socialist"