Any good anti-automobile literature? If you don't hate cars you're not a decent human being

lol

>t. No license and can't drive

don't you laugh at the stage coach.
Fuck with the horse and you get the HORDE
horse gang horse gang horse gang

The Southern Highway by Julio Cortázar

Based

>tfw been reading about ghengis khan all day
based and scourgeofgodpilled

This is impossible if you live in the US.

not if you live in a major city with public transit. i live in LA and i get by fine

But metropolitan areas are basically just giant parks for cars. They are disgusting. How can you claim to hate cars while living among them? Breathing in their filth, that smog is taking years off your life. LA is a barren hellhole. All California cities were built for cars. Wasn't it standard oil and Goodyear that bribed politicians to rip up all the trolleys and whatnot just so cars could drive.
Cities are fucked, especially LA.

That's called a car you imbecile

Kaczynski talked about this specifically in his manifesto.

Attached: Ted-Kaczynski-featured-prominently-in-the-recent-issue-of-Tiny-Homes-magazine.jpg (2550x3300, 2.61M)

Crash by J. G. Ballard. It's not necessarily anti-cars but it certainly holds an attitude towards them.

no its a fast stagecoach

i didnt choose to live in LA, im poor and i have a simple job here so i just deal with it.

BASED linkola

>All California cities were built for cars.
>Wasn't it standard oil and Goodyear that bribed politicians to rip up all the trolleys and whatnot just so cars could drive.
You contradicted yourself here, but you are right that it was corruption that led to much CA being so car focused. There used to be public transport.

And you're wrong about the first bit still for SF.

I'm sorry. Join the military(it's better than LA) or something to get out of there.
More like based retard. His take on ecological crisis is juvenile. Seriously, I knew more and had a better idea of what to do when I was a schoolboy.
No

>Join the military(it's better than LA)
kek are you retarded?

N-no, it was only a joke. NOW DROP AND GIVE ME 20 SISSYBOY
You could become an escort and pay your way out that way. Move to North Carolina

im not really that desperate to get out, im very good at shutting out the outside world and developing myself. but now im intrigued. why north carolina? also im very frugal so money isnt an issue im saving up a ton

>can't afford a car so i don't want anyone else to have one

It's just beautiful there. Especially if you are already adept at reclusion, you can avoid interacting with the local hicks. They can only build so many roads through the smokies, not many cars there. That way you don't have to stay inside to get away from fasr society

is it easy to get work there. i work in security and i dont want to work in any other field. i literally get paid to sit and read books and write and think.

The city after the automobile is kinda good. The authors ideas or solutions are garbage though

/o/ here. Can't believe I'm seeing fringie /n/igger threads on Yea Forums

Cars are here to stay. Like my guns.

>Cars are here to stay.
Oh, sweetie, baby, no.

Attached: Net_energy_cliff.gif (1516x812, 74K)

Go home, spongebob.

ellul.org/life/charbonneau-introduction/

The only book translated into English is called "The Green Light A Self-Critique of the Ecological Movement".

But his anti-car work is called L'hommauto (Automan/Carman).
It was written in 1967.
67. Think about it.

Here are two quotes :

L'auto n'a que faire de la liberté ; plus sa vitesse est grande, plus le choix se réduit. [...] Peut-être qu'un jour, en guise de chauffeur, la bagnole disposera d'une sorte de robot électronique informé en permanence par une machine cybernétique détenant toutes les données de la Circulation.

>The car has nothing to do with freedom; the higher the speed, the more reduced choice is. [...] Maybe one day, in place of a driver, cars will have a kind of electronic robot permanently informed by a cybernetic machine holding all the data about the Traffic.

Paris n'est plus, ce n'est pas Hitler mais Citroën qui l'a détruit.

>Paris does not exist anymore, it is not Hitler but Citroën who destroyed it

Attached: book-charbonneau-lhommauto.jpg (400x329, 21K)

I think Roger Scruton and Peter Hitchens have both written on the subject a fair bit.

Eat shit and die. cars suck and only autists like them. They bore me to death, on top of destroying the landscape and the climate. How anyone can find joy in those dumb, lifeless machines is beyond me.
Kek. Luckily, cars can't run on toxic masculinity alone

>hating cars
>implying

Attached: 1561039159383.jpg (1024x768, 372K)

Helium suspended carriages would have lightened the load to effectively zero.

calling bullshit on that 4th graders graph. There is no way solar, or especially biofuels, are cheaper than shale.

This. In fact, big oil, gas and coal often say renewables are cheaper in their reports because they know it will never be viable competition. BP shills for wind farms. The only form of energy that fossil fuels continue to lobby against is nuclear.

Biofuels would be cheap to use...If it didn't require turning 3/4 of farmland over to it rather than food.

Renewables produce a lot of energy at generation, but a lot is lost when it comes to transport and storage. Compare the distance you could travel on a battery the size of a 1gal jug, and 1gal of diesel.

this is probably what you are looking for

Attached: 51PWiGTZ31L._SX353_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg (355x499, 33K)

Is there a correlation between people that are anti-car that didnt have a dad/daddy issues I really wouldn't be surprised

i had a strong respectable father figure. he worked hard and was in the military and also worked for secret service for a while. he was very masculine and stern but also kind. he was basically the perfect father, im really not exaggerating

I'm actually the exact same as this guy except no secret service and
my dad operates a small business now.
The biggest correlate to hating cars is being correct.

youtube.com/watch?v=ouWQ25O-Mcg thread theme

>mfw driving a circle around my small town on the country roads.

Idaho is better.

I live in the US but my city is very bicycle-friendly. That said, getting around can still be a bit of a challenge. Oh well. I save a lot of money and I'm much healthier.

Sigh... what are we supposed to do with people like you? The world could be a nice place but you want it to remain a giant trash heap.

>what are we supposed to do with people like you?
there's really only one solution

Attached: saigon-execution-adams.jpg (900x600, 85K)

I haven't owned a car in 4 years. 2 different top-20 cities. As a bonus, bringing groceries back on foot from over a mile away is a damned good workout. I can walk anywhere I want, downtown is 20 minutes by foot. I no longer bike due to bad cage interactions, but on bike you have a 10 mile range, and if you get a bus/rail you can extend that indefinitely. bike to the rail station, rail most of the way, then bike to the destination. less than 2 miles of overall cycling, you don't even break a sweat.

I have saved tens of thousands of dollars not owning a cage. I even sold the bike for $100 more than I bought it for.

Idaho is lovely, there are many options. I'm from the East and I'm a big biophile, the reason I say nc is the smokies have the most life. Where I live is good too, but I don't recommend moving here because it is only for hillbillies.

I doubt you would find such a job as that in the mountains. But, it's very easy to do nothing if you buy a trailer and get disability.

What a womany post.

>please select all cars

kek

>get disability.
not disabled and i dont want to live in a trailer, no way

Somebody here should fly to Linkola's gay little shack in Finland and murder him, just cave his ugly mongoloid face with like a lead pipe.

DEATH TO ALL BIKIES

Attached: 1559244841702.webm (720x1274, 1023K)

Lol all the car guys I know(many) are pasty gamers with bad posture that would die without air conditioning. Cars are "numale"
Your loss, and you don't literally have to live in a trailer. I'm simply saying the cost of living isn't high. Urbanites don't seem to be comfortable living in the good places, indoor cats.

The natural/anthropogenic dichotomy is so fucking dumb. Dark green ecology is a massive moralizing cope for leftoids and fascists who are too dumb to see the current state of affairs as part of the teleology of life in the universe.

>as part of the teleology of life in the universe
wrong, man's nature telos is as a steward of nature

That's called opportunity cost.

Based and /ok/ pilled.

Attached: 1427474786967.gif (800x566, 676K)

Hillbillies are cool

Where and when? Sounds awfully normative to me.

Jello Biafra ran for mayor and proposed banning cars to the city limits and making all businessmen wear clown suits.
He was banned from every running again, but it seems we got a post-ironic version of his policies.

Anti-roads movement
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Road_protest_in_the_United_Kingdom
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Highway_revolt

theintercept.com/2019/03/23/ecoterrorism-fbi-animal-rights/
nytimes.com/2002/04/07/magazine/from-tree-hugger-to-terrorist.html
youtu.be/346c4Dt1gmg

I love my astra

I hate cars so much I am 25 and still don't have a drivers license

traffic sucks and highway culture sucks but driving and particularly at night is the most kino fucking feeling and any 'male' that knows nothing about cars or has no passion towards them is a complete and utter fag

i guess all your ancient ancestors were fags then. no wonder you came out to be such a flaming homo

>muh feelings
>only experience of masculinity is having his ass rumbling in a cuckmobile
Sounds pretty gay, faggot.

Attached: 3x644cxhx04x.png (1024x576, 596K)

Whatever dude, anyone that has sex likes cars because its a great place to get a blowey joey on the first date, not like you'd know you fucking virgin hahahaha

It's not about masculinity you retarded monkey its about the juxtaposition of the locomotive and the motionless, the existentially affirmative sense of in-der-welt-sein you get when taking a night drive and seeing the city lights pass you by

Admittedly I get to appreciate that more because I live in a city that looks like a cyberpunk dystopia

you sound like a pretentious twat

What the fuck
Are you my brother

only child. brother from another mother perhaps

>in-der-welt-sein
>larping in the holodeck

Attached: 636678028376425633-0721-DEMODERBY-001.jpg (1200x678, 212K)

Short of jetpacks, what sort of transportation DOESN'T require some sort of extensive infrastructure?

I live in Atlanta and the place is an absolute shithole because it was designed around the interstate.
No part of it is walkable, anywhere. Going anywhere requires you to get in a goddamn car and sit in traffic. The city cannot expand its dogshit barely-existent public transportation another inch because most of the area's wealth leaves it in suburban sprawl, and the boomers who live there would rather die than pay taxes towards any kind of public service at all.
The place is unlivable, I've been here my whole life and can't wait to get out. Fuck cars, fuck the corrupt piece of shit automakers who managed to lobby their way into ending American public transportation, and fuck the old cunts that continue to sell cars as the American dream.

My father was an abusive cunt and loved cars, literally nothing else.
You can probably manipulate that into your psychology somehow, but you also can't write a coherent sentence.

Attached: americathebeautiful.png (1080x498, 501K)

>WEEEEEEE, IM MOVING WHILE SITTING DOWN. HEHEHEE I CANT EVEN SEE THE STARS THIS IS SO BASED

Attached: 1545378291479.jpg (708x800, 56K)

Based. The no-car crew were winning the thread up until this post, now they’ll have to pick up the pace to match the rhetorical beastliness of this user

>Being such a retard that he not only fully buys into the images sold to him by advertising but tries to push them onto everyone else around him
Pay more attention to the reasons that you think the things you think
Go into any suburb of Atlanta, and most of the city itself, and this is uniformly how every bit of it looks.

I have often occasion to walk at night, for about a mile, over an entirely untravelled road, much of it between open fields without a house in sight. The circumstances are not favorable to severe study, but are so to calm meditation. If the sky is clear, I look at the stars in the silence, thinking how peaceful the world would be without those damned automobiles.

fun fact: all it would take for us to see the milky way for once in our lives is everyone to shut their fucking lights off for all of 10 minutes. they can't manage this, not even once a year, not at all.
>lives in shitlanta
Flee, brother. Save up a few thousand and flee. All is lost.

Yeah, I'm applying for jobs, and every single one is as far away as I can get.
Also, light pollution is a bitch. Fucks up more than aesthetics.

I just ran the numbers. Assuming half of the planet is awake, that's $1.3 billion of purchasing power adjusted GDP you'd be wasting, because we can only assume that basically all economic activity would halt. I'm not about to piss away $1.3 billion just because you're a fucking pussy fag who wants to stare at dumb shit

Hey, that's Ella Boulevard in Houston. The McDonald's was one of the first stores in Houston, though the original one was rebuilt. Most of the stores here I've been to at least once.

Attached: 1497207152583.png (300x310, 4K)

>highway culture
What? Spending a fifth of your life in a cage in rush hour traffic listening to shitty radio is “culture” now?

...

I meant the general practice of driving long distances to do virtually anything

Not culture in that sense

>muh gdp
>muh profit margin
Small-souled bugman.

> bikefag cope
> le "cage" meme
Epic bro. Yup I am in a cage, enjoy ur freedom u win

>being this passive aggressive
faggot

You can get a reliable car for really cheap. Cars aren't expensive if you want something to get you from A to B and aren't specifically into cars or want one for status or something.

pretty weak, i knew by the sight of his eyes he has nothing intelligent to say.

SEETHING CYCLECELS ITT LMAO

Based and redpilled

The anti-car gang is the type that never conducts metaphysical critiques of their own positions, I understand that this requires a complex thought which most perspectives never end up considering.
More materially, the anti-car gang type has never driven an amazing car, they probably all drive/drove automatic cuckmobiles out of societal necessity before coming to their conclusions. No matter how anti-car one is from an environmentalist/anti-technological perspective, to deny the wonder of driving a Honda CRX, alone or with a companion, at 4-5am (especially), is to be a total and complete retard lacking entirely in transcendental appreciativeness functions.

Attached: istockphoto-903509070-640x640.jpg (640x360, 11K)

fuck your numbers

>The anti-car gang is the type that never conducts metaphysical critiques of their own positions
>CAr goOd iT GO FAST and cost mAny money!!!

>People who agree with me are smart and unfortunately people who disagree with me are all retards
Amazing post
The pro-car gang ignores the atomisation of the American suburbanite, the dissolution of the American city, and the overall social erosion caused by the car in American life
You have, like previous posts, bought so far into the images sold to you by advertising that they have replaced reality for you

Attached: Nevada-Aerial-Christoph-Gielen.jpg (767x614, 390K)

Nobody is saying that suburban sprawl is a good thing, you fucking moron. There's just a difference between being opposed to low-density car-focused urban development and being opposed to the notion of automobiles themselves. The former is a sensible position backed by evidence; the latter is nothing but pure ressentiment from carless "adult" losers

>CRX
>Expensive

i like cars i can admire a good piece of engineering but this "ressentiment" and "loser" rhetoric makes you sound like a fucking broad

>the American city

Attached: 4f938ba8073d7dbdbbd83705d534f8b5e46dd4d9519791750813656cb9174200.png (728x546, 409K)

Cars are boring. You can't even see anything outside the window you are moving so fast. Can't even hear the birds singing over the road noise. Nothing about them is fun. Even reckless driving is banal.

But it's true! Why would someone be vehemently against cars - not car culture, but cars and driving themselves - unless they were just jealous? It makes literally no sense to me

And I can't even imagine where you guys had sex as teenagers if not in a car. You guys were having sex in high school, right?

Attached: 1296155530494.jpg (500x375, 110K)

Bicycles and the horse and carriage is the way to go.

Attached: 1552522376837.png (182x277, 3K)

I had a new 335i in highschool, this is me I sold it to fund travel (NOT in an automobile) and bought an old Ford ranger that I mistreat. Automobiles mean nothing to me.

>amazing post
Thanks
Nobody has sold me on the image of a CRX driving at 4am on harsh mountain roads, you fucking retard, have you even seen a car advert? They're focused entirely on fucking disgusting modern abominations with automatic gears, ABS, TC (LOL), rear view cameras etc etc, all designed for "comfort" and "economy" and "sustainability" and so on, designed specifically to cater to the urbanite. If you had ever been on a late night drive, through nice roads, in a nice car, you wouldn't be spewing the cuck shit you are. I imagine you being against riding horses while having never ridden as much as a pony in your life.

This

The only reason American cities are so vomit-inducing is because they were explicitly designed for cars

Anti-car cuckery is 90% adult losers, who somehow managed to fuck their life up so badly that they failed to get a driving license, coping.

cringe
that's like saying sex is just putting your piss hose into a woman's piss hole and moving around until you get tired, nothing about it is fun.

Because cars and car culture are ultimately inseparable. I'm not saying it's impossible to enjoy a nice drive through the country at night, but I am saying that you are not an island and your desire for a car magnified into an America where 400 million people desire a car turns the country into a smog-filled interstate-focused wasteland.
>You guys do know cars are a symbol of male verility right? You're not impotent right?
Please tell me you're not too dumb to understand that this wasn't your idea
>Nobody has sold me on the image of a CRX driving at 4am on harsh mountain roads, you fucking retard, have you even seen a car advert?
Are you actually this fucking dense? Are there people who post here that are genuinely too fucking stupid to critically think about advertising on any level when it so profoundly shapes how they view the world?
You reject advertising campaigns about safety and comfort, but if you think advertisers are going to chalk that up to a lost cause you do not understand the game. Easily 75% of American car ads focus heavily on the idea of independence for unique people just like you.

Attached: dumbass.jpg (800x533, 336K)

>Marketing told me if I don't buy a car, and a cheeseburger I'm a loser.
Carucks are infantile materialistic fetishists that need to justify their car payments
I have a car, and it means nothing to me.
I am resentful, that cars ruined the landscape and infrastructure so hard that riding a horse for my comings and goings is no longer practical.
Car people are usually suburbanites, subhuman by ecology.

Yes, and nobody is here praising cities or city driving (horrible experience, avoid at all costs). The pro-car posters in this thread are only saying that there is immense beauty in a good drive, the transcendental lonely drive experience is irreplaceable.

/out/ walking is amazing as well, but a completely different type of experience entirely. The mountain road is a beautiful thing, I am sorry that you couldn't appreciate it in your disgusting, expensive, wasteful (and probably automatic) 335i (abomination). The moment you have power steering, you're missing out on 90% of the road feeling, the road experience. Power steering is only necessary in a retardedly overweight car anyway (or an F1 car or something).

So, what cars have you driven?

>Driving a car is like sex
Ohh boy you should read anti-Oedipus.
This is how marketing fucks the consumer.

dubs of based & redpilled

>probably automatic
Nope. I had a sidestep 67 Chevy with no powersteering before I had my license. It was actually pretty nice, but that was youth.

The Space Shuttle Columbia. What entertainment franchise do you have on your tshirt today?

got em

Hahahahhahahahahahahahahahaha nice COMEBACK bro Ahahahah WOAH OWNED HAHAHAHAHAHAH
Now that's a real high level cringe moment from you my man

>The pro-car posters in this thread are only saying that there is immense beauty in a good drive, the transcendental lonely drive experience is irreplaceable.
+ The ability to travel and move without having to rely on public transport and time schedules
>inb4 get a bicycle
You can't travel 500km in the snow while hauling three pieces of luggauge on a bike. Fuck off.

This is me tbqh, im not anti-car cuck tho

big metal go vroom!

We don't fucking know what the telos is. Everything is just larping. At least the antitech larping makes people less miserable.

>our desire for a car magnified into an America where 400 million people desire a car turns the country into a smog-filled interstate-focused wasteland.

That's not how that works. People don't buy a car to enjoy it, otherwise everyone would be buying track cars and going out for night drives. The average normie just needs it to get from A to B because of the way cities are set up in North America.

You're still just attacking a symptom of the poor urban planning in this country. That same urban planning that also creates housing shortages and forces gentrification on poor neighborhoods. How about you direct your energy there instead of trying to shoehorn rabid anti-consumerism into an issue that has far more insidious and dangerous roots?

Automobile ads do not exist to create demand for cars. They exist to differentiate cars to the lay consumer. The demand for cars is generated organically because of their necessity in modern America. Ads are just different manufacturers trying to capture that demand. You'd have to be a fool to think that ads exist in order to indoctrinate Americans into car culture. It's just like Marx says. The base is more powerful than the superstructure.

What about my boy Timothy Morton that's moralizing?

lol the universe put a gun to my head and told me to be a wage cuck

You can't make this shit up. You want to write your slavery into the laws of the universe, hahahahha

Only if you live in a godforsaken suburb

Long-term welfare of the human species depends intrinsically on nature's welfare. You deny your place in the web at your own peril.

Not an argument.
Besides, I, as an individual, do not NEED to be a wage cuck. You've stated nothing.

>Automobile ads do not exist to create demand for cars. They exist to differentiate cars to the lay consumer.
Have you been cryogenically frozen since the first world war? Large-scale advertising has been about libidinal desire since Edward Bernays, if not earlier.
>The demand for cars is generated organically because of their necessity in modern America.
The demand came from the necessity, but the necessity was not generated organically. Car manufacturers and oil trusts were some of the most powerful lobbying groups in the 20th century, and they spent a hell of a lot of money forcing this necessity. Why do you think European transportation is so much more reliant on high-speed rail than the US?
>You'd have to be a fool to think that ads exist in order to indoctrinate Americans into car culture.
Yeah, advertisers have our best interest at heart. Manipulation and indoctrination are wrong, and ads are right, so they'd never engage in that.

Attached: wpr6sy7lmex11.jpg (3024x4032, 997K)

>The demand for cars is generated organically because of their necessity in modern America.
And who's to blame? The car lobby! 120 years ago the USA had a "public" transportation system superior to anything in the world. In order to increase demand the car manufacturers bought all the trams, bus lines and railways and let them rot away or rightout close them so people would have to buy more cars.

My father is an enormous pussy and I resent him for it. I definitely have daddy issues on some level, but I hate cars

>economic activity takes place at 10 pm
kk
>half the planet
for what purpose?

post yfw you realize that transportation was literally superior 100 years ago:
>streets were shared by cars, pedestrians, bicycles, horses, carriages, etc.
>train infrastructure for long distance travel
>streets were smaller, cities more compact (Not sprawling)

cagers really fucked up

>things are this way so the universe meant it to be this way since the dawn of time
>beep boop I have no agency my masters will do my thinking and living for me

>The demand came from the necessity, but the necessity was not generated organically. Car manufacturers and oil trusts were some of the most powerful lobbying groups in the 20th century, and they spent a hell of a lot of money forcing this necessity. Why do you think European transportation is so much more reliant on high-speed rail than the US?

That's all true and well. And that, in part, precipitated the urban planning issues that we should be addressing. But today, that constructed necessity exists independently of any present advertising or, for most of us on this board, advertising that occurred during our lifetimes.

As a matter of fact, there is no economic rationale to such large-scale advertising in the face of an already existent car culture. If there were true collusion between firms on the image/culture front, they would collectively agree to not waste advertising dollars promoting their vehicles but rather redirect the money into lobbying and product investment. This is especially true now; in the cold war US landscape, there were only two major manufacturers vying for Americans' demand, and collusion was far easier. International competition has decimated their ability to do that. Modern advertising is, more than anything, the conduit through which differentiation is demonstrated to the masses. It will sometimes showcase aesthetic motifs, but more importantly it will emphasize how the product is differentiated in specifically discernible quantitative metrics like fuel economy or safety ratings or whatever other gay shit

All of this that I'm saying is just to demonstrate that no, the pleasure that several 20-something year olds feel on an anonymous Bhutanese Scuba Diving forum when driving is not the product of a constructed advertising-fueled culture (that they probably weren't even privy to, given how detached they are from traditional media). It probably won't be that way for future generations either. Driving is intrinsically pleasurable to many people in the same way bicycling or gliding are, and there's no need for you to assault that. Go join your local YIMBY chapter if you really care about fighting sprawl and ending car culture. It has far darker origins than just automobile manufacturers - the history of the American suburbs is primarily one of racism. And let me have my smoking night drives in peace

Attached: IMG_20190715_001517.jpg (900x900, 91K)

When it's 10pm on the east coast, it's prime working hours in Asia. All I'm saying is, no matter when you decide to have these 10 minutes, it's probably gonna cost a metric fuckton

Good.

It costs zero, brainlet.
>shut lights off for ONE city or ONE region is sufficient to see the stars
>that negro buying malt liquor at 10 pm can wait ten minutes, store still gets the sale
You did some shitty math on flawed illogical foundations, got attached to your labor, and refuse to admit you're a retard to begin with. Stop posting before you embarrass yourself further.
>m-muuh..uh...hospitals!
hospitals DO turn off lights in patient rooms. Even granted you want them on, a handful of locations in the city retaining their lights will not significantly impact the ability to see the stars.
>t-timezones
Move city by city at 10 pm local time. Or whatever chosen hour you like.

duuuuuuhhhhhh!!!!! hurr durr!

paul phallus

Light pollution is part of the control program user, haven't you realized it by now? Cant remind the cogs they live in a vast and mysterious universe, not good for business

Nice argument

Watch this doc if you haven't already
youtube.com/watch?v=p-I8GDklsN4

Well, the original post said 'everyone' so I interpreted that in the most accurate way possible. I don't know how much light emission needs to be cut and over what wide an area to see the Milky Way. I'm not an astrophysicist.

>that in the most accurate way
in the most autistic way possible. people can go in turns as well, not just all at once. HUURRRR
seek therapy for your autism, it's become brain-disruptive.
>i-i-i-i-i-i'm not an astrophysicist, idk that you just need to turn off the majority of lights to see the stars
An 8 year old could be expected to know that.

Again. Stop posting. Go read a fucking book until you become not-retarded. hurr durr daa daaa!

If that's the case and you only need a small area to be blacked out then just go drive into a fucking rural area you fucking double nigger, why would you will that the rest of the city be inconvenienced just because you want to see something? How fucking narcissistic and pathetic you are

>As a matter of fact, there is no economic rationale to such large-scale advertising in the face of an already existent car culture. If there were true collusion between firms on the image/culture front, they would collectively agree to not waste advertising dollars promoting their vehicles but rather redirect the money into lobbying and product investment.
I really, genuinely wish this was true, but the libertarian idea of a perfectly wise and efficient capitalist machine is not reality.
Advertising is not informational, it is aspirational. This has been true for nearly a century. Car brands need to cultivate an image of what their brand means - Lexus pushes its luxury, Subaru pushes its engineering, Ford pushes its ability to give you a functioning dick, etc - and shove that image as far into your head as it can, to the point that the main goals of 21st century advertising now include getting consumers so invested in the brand that they accidentally advertise it themselves.
You also, more specifically to cars, don't need active collusion to get to the same place when you're advertising similar products. Chevy didn't need to sit in a room with Ford on a teleconference with the guys at Nissan to realize that pushing the narrative of cars as an achievement of independence and a symbol of male verility sells them well.

Basically, no, the individual enjoying night drives is not bad, but if that individual is unaware of the way he was manipulated into buying that car and ignores the entire enormous culture of consumerism tied into it, that individual needs to be more aware of his surroundings.
There are other factors of American suburban hellscapes, racism being among them, but nobody made shitloads of money selling racism to the public. Cars contributed just as much, if not more, to these systemic problems, and the fact is that the majority of Americans were so successfully manilulated that most don't recognize that the systemic problems are there in the first place, let alone that cars played such a major role.

Ever been to Boston? They were always shit.

The Geography of Nowhere by James Howard Kunstler

What about motorcycles, are they also haram?

anything that requires a job to own and maintain it is neoliberalcapitafascism dude

>Advertising is not informational, it is aspirational. This has been true for nearly a century. Car brands need to cultivate an image of what their brand means - Lexus pushes its luxury, Subaru pushes its engineering, Ford pushes its ability to give you a functioning dick, etc - and shove that image as far into your head as it can

It's both, and the aspirational component is still part of the differentiation. Different brands push different narratives, and given that two-car households are the norm and women form much of the modern consumerbase for cars, it isn't simply about a singular narrative of coolness or masculinity but differential narratives that emphasize the utility of the vehicles for a given type of consumer. It's a changed landscape, and an informal one-dimensional collusion is not really possible anymore. Firms can't push a singular notion of car-as-fulfillment in the way automobile advertisements used to be able to do for their overwhelmingly male consumers with limited purchasing options.

Yeah, I can get behind this. Ultimately, I leave you with this map. The number of cars on the road in Europe and America is similar on a per capita basis. Many Europeans are passionate about cars too, so it's probably possible to have a society where cars are respected and people can be enthusiastic about them but where they are not a universal requirement for urban or suburban life. I don't think the typical /o/ car-head will complain about highways getting torn down to build higher density neighborhood and transit lines.

Attached: 1920px-World_vehicles_per_capita.svg.png (1920x974, 285K)

Also I should add - it becomes a bit of a problem to just hate cars when you end up siding with NIMBYs who fight car culture and highway expansions but who then will also fight development and housing expansion because they don't want their property values to go down. Though obviously it is pretty hard to passionate devote one's self to the cause of evidence-based urban planning without something to latch onto and hate

>pro-car people are comparing operating a machine to a religious experience
Modernity was a mistake.

>car culture

Attached: jeremy clarksoy.jpg (600x300, 38K)

>just force 1 million people to drive 5 hours into the wilderness bro
>that's easier than chilling the fuck out and having tea for 10 minutes once a year
mush-brain

it is, if you weren't such a fucking manchild, you'd realize that "chilling the fuck out and having tea for 10 minutes once a year" isn't an option in the real world.

>he thinks cities and not nature are the "real" world

Then fuck the real world lmao, why do you put up with it?

>Nobody is saying that suburban sprawl is a good thing, you fucking moron.
And, yet, you are in total denial that possessing a car and being reliant on it for getting anywhere leads to suburban sprawl as a logical conclusion

>looking at the stars
lmao what kind of gay shit is this. i'll smash your face in, how's that for seeing stars m8?

Elliot Rodger loved cars and he was the definition of an adult-loser

>time schedules
traffic is a time schedule

Attached: 137066-full.png (704x528, 68K)

gotta get dat money maaaaaaane

How can anyone hate something as based as a car? Since I bought mine life is completely different. Freedom.

>there is no economic rationale to such large-scale advertising in the face of an already existent car culture.
wat. car companies need to constantly sell cars to generate profits. If enough people don't buy cars, if cars worked too reliably over long periods of time, the companies would have gone bankrupt a long time ago. The whole advertising system keeps people constantly swapping out their cars like fashion items. This is the nature of mass consumerism as constructed post-WWII

>that several 20-something year olds feel on an anonymous Bhutanese Scuba Diving forum when driving is not the product of a constructed advertising-fueled culture
Yes it is. The product has been so deeply inserted into your life and thought patterns that you have become its personal salesmen. It's well known the best advertising doesn't come from the ad itself but by getting people to talk about it and repeat things about it

>the real world
bro we already shut down everything like 15 times a year for a bunch of retarded holidays. you're saying TEN MINUTES during the fucking middle of the night when hardly anything is even open to begin with would grind the economy to a halt?

You're doubling down because you don't want to admit you were wrong and retarded. you are the big dumb stuupidest fucking dumbass i've ever seen posting here. This is beyond mushbrain, this is milkshake-brain. someone must have inserted an immersion blender into your ear as a kiddo, m8-o. but keep going, this is hilarious.

it is. all the stop signs, traffic lights, traffic jams, occur within certain time intervals. It's just more diffuse so as a car driver you don't think about it that way because you perceive that your in control of the situation because you can push a pedal.

He's bought in to the "LIFESTYLE" meme, as have the people who keep using the word "freedom" in relation to cars.

Attached: oldads1984FordThunderbird_1000.jpg (1000x1361, 287K)

You don't get it bro he's a real man in the real world he ain't got time for faggy shit like seeing stars

>CARS ARE LE EPIC! ITS LIKE MARIO KART IN REAL LIFE! WOWZERS!!
>YOU CAN ONLY BE A REAL MAN IF YOU HAVE A BIG BROOM BROOM MACHINE! TV TOLD ME SO!
>WTF YOU DONT WANT TO SPEND AN ABSURD AMOUNT OF MONEY ON A CAR? UHHH WTF ARE YOU AN INCEL OR SOMETHING WTF GROSS EW

forgot pic

Attached: 1560514816631.gif (960x616, 382K)

there are people in this thread defending cars.

Haven't read Air-Conditioned Nightmare yet but I'd bet Miller has a screed or three about cars in it. Lolita is definitely a harsh criticism of interstate culture.

The problem isn't vehicles.

It's
1. Too many fucking people.
- The global population needs to be reduced by at least 75%.
_______________________
2. Suburbanization.
This necessitates a vehicle for much of the population. We shouldn't have suburbs.
- The solution is to build giant commie blocks near work places, so that people can walk to work.

Face it, suburbs are MAJOR cope. It's adults 'playing house'. They think their suburban cuck plot surrounded on all 4 sides by neighbors they hate is real "land", and they feel they are self-sufficient.
_______________________________
3. Incongruous tax schemes based on locality.
There should be no local income taxes, no local property taxes. Everything should be uniform regardless of geographics. Local governments are corrupt and obsolete units that are responsible for suburbanization.

Vehicles are fine for rural areas.

Humans weren't meant to live like insects. The "cope" is a direct reaction to the hellscape you are proposing.

ATL checking in. Bike only since 2002.

>I live in Atlanta and the place is an absolute shithole because it was designed around the interstate.
> No part of it is walkable, anywhere.
you live in the suburbs, you mean. the Beltline (ped/bike path) directly contradicts you.

Lol. If anything it's not advertising that has convinced 22 year old white guys to like cars but the movie Drive and their own desire to identify with a solitary man in a solitary pursuit

I've always hated cars and refused to learn to drive, almost 30 now and have stuck to my guns, cycle anywhere from 50-100 miles each week. I guess you could say I'm pretty based (and better than you).

Attached: tullscgvi4a21.jpg (615x768, 67K)

Movies are advertising. Ever heard of product placement?

No car is mentioned by name in the movie though

Doesn't have to be so blatant. The whole set of assumptions are presented as the protagonist relates to his car bu his actions, it creates a lifestylism that because this moody individual on the screen finds his release on the screen driving a cage with certain music and a affected look on his face, the impressionable viewer thinks he can mimic the character and reach his emotional aesthetic

You know, if you think like that about everything, your life becomes one big unfalsifiable narrative.

No, I've lived in the city for the past four years after living in the suburbs for eighteen.
The Beltline is a loop around the city. A person living in an apartment inside the perimeter cannot reach the Beltline on foot and most can't reach much of anything without getting in a car because, once again, Atlanta is designed to be driven through. Every street in the city is car-centric, there is nowhere designed for pedestrians first.

Attached: Get-Connected-Map-2016.jpg (720x828, 96K)

This is a street in Barcelona. Cars can get through if they need to for emergencies, deliveries, etc, but your average person going about their day walks comfortably wherever they need to go and takes public transit to go farther. This is more environmentally friendly, less financially draining on city infrastructure, and makes for a better sense of community and safety for the residents.

Attached: apartamentos-no-24-the-streets-barcelona-PF23489_1.jpg (528x320, 46K)

Let me play devil's advocate. In the majority of major cities with well-developed public transit systems and walkability, the overall commute time is generally similar to American cities. In general people will tolerate commutes up to a certain length and affordability naturally pushes them towards that value. In Tokyo, nobody drives EVER, but people still commute for upwards of 40 minutes a day on average.

It is more environmentally friendly though, for sure. Though whether it strictly dominates suburban life is up for debate. It might not be as clean as a suburban setting, and the lack of nearby facilities for recreation might be inconvenient

This is an average street in Atlanta.
If commute times aren't significantly different, then the option with more safety and sustainability, lower costs, and a happier, more vibrant populace is the better option.

Attached: 7039270541_2e15de06c6_b.jpg (1024x680, 225K)

>too many people
>implying
Tokyo has 23 million and isn't a shithole. No crime, kids walk to school alone and don't get run over, trains run on time. There's not too many people in murrka, there's too many retards to enter civilization.

However, you're correct about the "muh land" suburbfucks with 1/20 an acre and 90% of that is taken up by the house and driveway. "m-muh land." lmao. what are you gonna grow there to feed your family of 4 500 lb land-whales? about 3 tomato plants and a few zucchini? yeah bro.
humans have been living in groups as large as possible since caveman times broski. and double lol if you think your mcmansion is non-insect in a literal hive of 100 other identical mcmansions, all coming and going in little cages you pour your money into, to get to your wageslave job to earn money to pay for the cage to get to your job.

Elaborate please. Also isn't yours the same

See you in mice nirvana, faggot.

And as we all know, Japs are the happiest people on earth.

they're on less antidepressants than americans, and jisatsu is their culture. but yeah, some poorfaggot in shitlanta is reeeeeaaaaally happier than a nice japanese family in tokyo

Henry Ford doomed us all.

every single person in barcelona is a faggot, which is reflected in your post

>look at me posting an old town street thinking it's an argument
not representative at all

Attached: barcelona1gfss5478.jpg (852x480, 70K)

How do you date without a car?
I'm not going to be able to pick up chicks until I'm whippin I feel

Barcelona has few avenues like this one.

don't worry about that, incel--you'll never date women.

i was dating a guy who just got lyfts to dates. or you can take the train. did you even watch boogiepop warawanai?

Right, because as we know, the Japanese have enough personal autonomy and willpower to seek out psychiatric help, and don't kill themselves at a high rate because of the negative synergy of overwork, oppressive social stigma, and living in shoeboxes.

>Japanese
>Family

My dad would rebuild the engine in his mustang every year and was in construction all his life. Hate cars

If you aren't an anarcho-primivtist, then you want everyone in the world to die.

Do you fags just want everyone to live in some shitty studio appartment in every city or something? Maybe its technically better for the earth or whatever but id rather fucking die desu

No way I was reading the entire thread, but the obvious recommendation is The Magnificent Ambersons - sorry if it's been posted several times.

It's entirely reasonable to design most population centers - urban and rural - to minimize individual driving, and in many countries they do
Suburbs are an unholy fucking blight that shouldn't exist

tesla owners are the worst

>Dude sex ! like sex you know woah ! you aren't a loser are you ? you drive cars and have sex right ? haha
Can you please keep your neurosis down ? It is really invasive. No one cares that you get all your masculine identity and self worth from a machine and marketing.

> ?

Eat shit, Frenchie, nobody gives a fuck

I like cars, I just don't like other people having cars too.

Attached: tsa8ut68ptj01.jpg (1600x1200, 292K)

This is a really weird post but hey alright.

>minimize individual movement
>only travel in galleys like a fucking slave yasss

Attached: eee.jpg (647x740, 54K)

>Suburbs are an unholy fucking blight that shouldn't exist

Too bad our ancestors couldn't pick their own cotton.

What if I do want everyone in the world to die? Why cling onto this multicultural 1984-style clusterfuck anyway? Let it all burn down.

Attached: 65186089_2804127922995391_2769196305178320373_n.jpg (720x900, 76K)

In most parts of Southern Europe it would be enough to renovate old town houses and palaces in the historic centres of towns and cities
But apparently lower middle class kikes want some dull and poor quality semi-detached houses or mc mansions parodies (if they can afford them)
Only immigrants in public housing and old money families now still live in urban brick and stone houses
Fucking kikes

what cities look like cyberpunk dystopias¿?

Attached: 1562649072845.jpg (788x699, 54K)

Live in a small city in the frozen north of the US, never got my license, never owned a car, been almost a year since I have been in any motorized form of transit. Never had problems getting around by foot and bike, been doing it for 20 years now. Don't even use mail order really, perhaps once or twice a year.

I don't hate cars though, just prefer to move under my own power and would rather look back on a life of traveling thousands of miles under my own power then hours of sitting in traffic, I do over 5,000 miles a year on my bike, almost got 10,000 one year, would have but that winter sucked for biking so I was a pedestrian for a couple months.

I do, desu.
>walk outside, a million things around
>always a new street or neighborhood to explore
>dazzling skyscrapers everywhere
>thousands of bars and restaurants
>usually something natural and cool (Seattle is on the sound, NYC has waterfront, Philly has riverfront, Miami is on a beach, SF has the bay and ocean)
>huge amazing parks nearby, places in the city that feel like wilderness
>amazing flower gardens
>farmers markets and festivals and amazing christmas displays
>all in walking distance
Are you saying you'd give all that up for an extra bedroom to fill with crap you bought and don't even use or particularly like?

>DUDE i just LOVE the hustle and bustle of the big city, it’s so DYNAMIC and makes me feel like i’m in one of my favourite TV SHOWS. you should totally come on down to my studio apartment, it’s got EXPOSED RED BRICK walls and everything, we can crack open a nice hoppy ipa or three and get crazy watching some cartoons on adult swim! and dude, dude, DUDE, we have GOTTA go down to the barcade- listen here, right, it’s a BAR where us ADULTS who do ADULTING can go DRINK. BUT!!!! it’s also an ARCADE like when we were kids, so we can play awesome VIDEO GAMES, without dumb kids bothering us. speaking of which megan and i have finally decided to tie the knot- literally -we’re both getting snipped tomorrow at the hospital, that way we can save money to spent more on ourselves and our FURBABIES. i’m fuckin JACKED man, i’m gonna SLAM this craft beer and pop open another one!!!

Attached: 1556405437938.jpg (200x200, 7K)

Autogeddon by Heathcote Williams is well written and precisely what you're after

rent free

Tokyo

Damn, guess I'll go live in a 200-person flyover shithole where nobody does anything but work and smoke meth so that none of my internet friends think I'm the type of person who plays nintendo games

>we can crack open a nice hoppy ipa or three and get crazy watching some cartoons on adult swim!

hahahaha, i wasn't expecting this post to be as good as it was

this is a whole class of people who often come across as outwardly normal but they're fucking horrible, arguably worse than the more stereotypical basedboys because at least those guys are committed to their pathetic fake comic book movie obsession. the worst faggots are the "not quite a hipster but low key hip!" ones.

It's pasta

Anybody whose ancestors were the ones making those decisions would have fuck-you money today
My ancestors were more of the "get piss drunk in the street, start a knife fight with somebody for being a Pr*testant, and get your townhouse seized because of gambling debts" persuasion